Debunking the illusion that jfk's head moved forward

7forever · August 14th, 2011, 02:02 PM

This silly argument has been used by government loyalists for decades but finally it can be shown to be an illusion. His head appears to move forward slightly between 312-313 but what really happens is jfk's bottom skull half gapes open providing this illusion. What these crazies failed to show is someone besides jfk, shot from the rear that goes forward slightly, stops, and violently goes backward. It's impossible on its face but debunking any jfk myth is good because there are so many and this one is used by both conspiracy kooks and WC supporters.

If you look at the top rear of his head and hair, it never moves forward of the white line. The bottom half of his skull gapes open from front impact causing this illusion that I figured out only two days ago. After two years things keep coming to me and this one is important for both debunking goverment crazies and disinfo idiots who promote two shots to the head.

This capture shows perfectly the rear skull gaped open with the top and bottom on the same vertical level.

Notice that jfk's nose never moves but his head appears to move forward because of the rear starting to break.

Watch his right front kind of contract from impact.

7forever · August 14th, 2011, 02:03 PM

What happened is jfk's forehead absorbed the impact making his head kind of straighten before slamming backward. This can be seen in nix also.

7forever · August 15th, 2011, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

The only silly argument is that a gaping wound can create the illusion that his head moved forward.
Sorry but one has nothing to do with the other in fact your posted images clearly showed that his head did move forward slightly before the wound appeared.
As with the rest of your empty and false claims this one fails

The only silly argument is that a gaping wound can create the illusion that any head could move slightly in one direction before reversing violently in the opposite direction.

Sorry, but one has everything thing to do with the other and in fact the images clearly show that his head did not move forward slightly before the wound appeared.

As with the rest of your empty and false claims of government support, this one fails, as have all the others.

7forever · August 15th, 2011, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobster

no matter how many times i look at it, there's still a gap there from him moving his head. you helped illustrate this movement by drawing the lines on, so thankyou

Of course there's gap in the middle where the exit wound was but the top rear never moves forward of the white line. The exit wound's clearly on the right rear at the moment of front impact.

7forever · August 17th, 2011, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soupnazi

The images clearly show that his head did move forward before going back and to the left.
Everyone looking at YOUR post sees that his head moves forward of the white line which you placed in the picture. Sorry but you are proven wrong it did move forward consistent with a shot from behind.
Like all of your claims you simply deny reality to make up an imaginary scenario

Everyone looking at the gif sees that the top rear never moves forward. Sorry, but this myth is debunked and his head did not move forward with the fantasy shot from behind.

7forever · August 17th, 2011, 11:23 AM

quote=daws101;4008029]

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7forever

Quote:

Originally Posted by daws101

nice dodge! now answer the question can you prove you evidence is valid!

DUMB dodge! now answer the question can you prove a rear shot by using another person besides jfk? NO WAY YOU OR ANY HUMAN CAN PROVE THE IMPOSSIBLE.:eusa_liar:

you first, here's how this works....YOU are the plaintiff, it is incumbent upon you to prove your allegations .I've ask you to show credible proof ..you have not...that can only lead to one logical conclusion you have none ..so you're makin' shit up!:lol:[/QUOTE]

YOU support the WC, it is incumbent upon you to TRY AND prove their fantasies. I won't ask you to show credible proof because there isn't any...that can only lead to one logical conclusion, you have none, so you're supporting proven lies.

JFK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT.

A MAN SHOT FROM THE REAR GOING FORWARD, LOGICALLY.

7forever · August 17th, 2011, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K-Wurx

Sorry dude but his head is clearly moving forward. Not just the mid section of it, the whole damn thing. Not to mention, the bottom of the skull you are referring to is his neck...I can clearly see where his hair is and it moves FORWARD. And unless the bullet was of explosive content, the exit wound is where the spray usually goes. If he was shot in the front the spray would be BEHIND his head.

Sorry dude but his head is NOT moving forward. Not just the mid section of it, the whole damn thing. Not to mention, the bottom of the skull is blown out...I can clearly see where his hair is and it does not move FORWARD. the exit wound is where the gape is on the right rear. If he was shot in the rear he would have went forward like this guy.

The top of his head does not forward of the white which is proven by the rear exit.

7forever · August 18th, 2011, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biggabum

I like 7's posts.
The thing is, I dont see how 7's theory is any less plausable than the Grassy Knoll Theory, and there's far more subscribe to that.
Admittedly, I dont see or agree with everything that 7 puts forward, but the fact that I do see some of his evidence is enough to make me think he may be on to something. He has obviously researched this a lot and must know that what he was putting forward challenged the established theories and he would be laughed at by some people, who in my opinion, seem to accept other theories that have far less supporting evidence.
As for the head moving forward...there are a few possibilities that 7 may or may not have considered. Firstly He could be right and its an optical illusion caused by the gape. There is also the possibility that, as we know, Zapruder stated that the film that was returned to him was different to the film he gave up, so there is a possibility that the forward movement is faked...or my thoughts are that assuming 7 is right and Greer pulled the trigger, he may have took his foot of the gas slightly as he turned to fire and this, causing the car to slow, caused those in the car to lurch forward slightly, I back this up by looking at the gifs and noticing that all exept Mrs K seem to move forward slightly in sync with JFK.

There is only one possibility, the correct one. The rear of his skull gaped causing this illusion that didn't support a shot from the rear anyway. It was a moot point. The only way I could be wrong about his head NOT moving forward is if it could be proven that jfk did not have an exit wound on the right rear. He clearly did and slow motion has confirmed that.

nagrom · December 10th, 2011, 01:36 AM

oh//what happend

Fascist Canuck · December 12th, 2011, 02:22 PM

Some people are blind, but his head clearly moved forward. Eyeglasses, anyone?

Kruschev sure got his revenge. I love it.

7forever · December 13th, 2011, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fascist Canuck

Some people are blind, but his head clearly moved forward. Eyeglasses, anyone?

Kruschev sure got his revenge. I love it.

It clearly shows a massive gaping hole on the right rear.

Kyuubi · December 20th, 2011, 06:08 AM

I guess 7forever got tired of spamming just one thread and created his own to double the fun. He could at least use NSFW tags for some of his grotesque pictures and show the smallest amount of respect for the man he's arguing was killed by insiders

7forever · April 6th, 2014, 01:04 PM

Quote: