The Political Fray - Political Forum
Go Back   Political Fray > The Political Fray > Government and Politics

Government and Politics Government and Politics Forum including laws, elections, government structure, and political theory


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 19th, 2010, 03:45 PM   #1
myp
Founding Father
 
myp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: US
Posts: 5,841

Could it be the end of bailout nation?

I was just watching the Kudlow Report (great rhetoric that man has) and he was talking about how the court order on the Fed to release loan information during the crisis as well as criticism of Senator Dodd from FDIC chairman Bair (more on that exchange here: http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...d-by-bair.html ) could mean the end of "bailout nation" by essentially stopping any such bailouts in the future. Do you think it will happen?

As a free market capitalist, I dearly hope so.
myp is offline  
Old March 19th, 2010, 03:53 PM   #2
Anarchist
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
From: Disunited Queendom
Posts: 1,943

As a hardcore socialist with a fetish for justice and as a proponent of the interests of ordinary people, i very much hope not another bailout occurs.
Dirk is offline  
Old March 19th, 2010, 07:37 PM   #3
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,661

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk View Post
As a hardcore socialist with a fetish for justice and as a proponent of the interests of ordinary people, i very much hope not another bailout occurs.
Ah, the sweet smell of the Right and Left in agreement! Love it.
David is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 01:53 PM   #4
Analyst
 
SpayAndNeuterLibs's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 52

Quote:
Originally Posted by myp View Post
I was just watching the Kudlow Report (great rhetoric that man has) and he was talking about how the court order on the Fed to release loan information during the crisis as well as criticism of Senator Dodd from FDIC chairman Bair (more on that exchange here: http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...d-by-bair.html ) could mean the end of "bailout nation" by essentially stopping any such bailouts in the future. Do you think it will happen?

As a free market capitalist, I dearly hope so.
I hope that bailouts will come to an end. If a business can't sustain its self it should go out of business. The American taxpayers shouldn't have the burden of the financial support of a failing company.

As far as do I think the bailout of failing businesses will come to an end? No, not without some drastic changes to the mentality of the elected officials and the American people.
SpayAndNeuterLibs is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 01:57 PM   #5
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpayAndNeuterLibs View Post
I hope that bailouts will come to an end. If a business can't sustain its self it should go out of business. The American taxpayers shouldn't have the burden of the financial support of a failing company.

As far as do I think the bailout of failing businesses will come to an end? No, not without some drastic changes to the mentality of the elected officials and the American people.
Pretty significant that the Government, which is basically insolvent on paper, would regard itself as competent to bail out failed businesses. Worse, that the people have not made a stipulation to the Government to report every cent that has gone into the bailouts. The people have to basically take the Federal Government to court to force it to discover what it has been up to?
deanhills is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 02:07 PM   #6
Analyst
 
SpayAndNeuterLibs's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 52

Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
Pretty significant that the Government, which is basically insolvent on paper, would regard itself as competent to bail out failed businesses. Worse, that the people have not made a stipulation to the Government to report every cent that has gone into the bailouts. The people have to basically take the Federal Government to court to force it to discover what it has been up to?
Even after a court order, how can full disclosure be proven? If we can't trust them to follow the true meaning of the constitution, we could never assume that they would fully comply with a court order of full disclosure. There is just far too much corruption in the federal government. Even in state government.
SpayAndNeuterLibs is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 02:09 PM   #7
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpayAndNeuterLibs View Post
Even after a court order, how can full disclosure be proven? If we can't trust them to follow the true meaning of the constitution, we could never assume that they would fully comply with a court order of full disclosure. There is just far too much corruption in the federal government. Even in state government.
Surely if a mere mortal like me can see this, those in Government, or on the immediate sidelines of Government have to see it too? Why the apathy, why isn't someone doing anything about it? Like a Government who has less than zero dollars in its coffers, in fact as a large gaping black hole in its Bank, spending most of the last year debating a health bill that it cannot afford. Just the amounts that have to have been invested in the campaign of the bill, man hours in fighting through it, all the negotiations, it really does not make any sense!
deanhills is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 02:26 PM   #8
Analyst
 
SpayAndNeuterLibs's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 52

Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
Surely if a mere mortal like me can see this, those in Government, or on the immediate sidelines of Government have to see it too? Why the apathy, why isn't someone doing anything about it? Like a Government who has less than zero dollars in its coffers, in fact as a large gaping black hole in its Bank, spending most of the last year debating a health bill that it cannot afford. Just the amounts that have to have been invested in the campaign of the bill, man hours in fighting through it, all the negotiations, it really does not make any sense!
Because it's not their intention to run a balanced budget or help the American people. It's no more then a grab of power, while in the process demonizing businesses for profiting form their efforts. Which in turn provides a false sense of justification for the socializing of areas of the free market.
SpayAndNeuterLibs is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 07:40 PM   #9
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,661

I don't have a problem with bailouts considering they stabilize the economy (if done right) but if the gov't is going to use tax payer money to buy them out, then shouldn't the stock go to the taxpayers? I'd think the dividends from AIG, GM, Chrysler, ect. would more then make up the use of our tax dollars.
David is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 08:02 PM   #10
myp
Founding Father
 
myp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: US
Posts: 5,841

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
I don't have a problem with bailouts considering they stabilize the economy (if done right) but if the gov't is going to use tax payer money to buy them out, then shouldn't the stock go to the taxpayers? I'd think the dividends from AIG, GM, Chrysler, ect. would more then make up the use of our tax dollars.
"Stabilizing" the market throughout bailouts is nothing more than moral hazard and arguably in the long-run causes less stability than the lack of bailouts.

As for the dividends, technically the taxpayers did gain from the companies that paid us back- the banks (GMAC, the GSEs, and some others haven't been able to pay us back, but the big banks all have.) The bailouts were not made in the form of stock purchase, but instead as loans and the government did get payments from the banks, with interest.

That does not mean it is right to use taxpayer money to create a moral hazard that in the long run might just cause more destruction (not to mention every company might not be able to pay us back as we are currently finding out with some of the bailed out corporations.)
myp is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 08:07 PM   #11
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,661

Quote:
Originally Posted by myp View Post
"Stabilizing" the market throughout bailouts is nothing more than moral hazard and arguably in the long-run causes less stability than the lack of bailouts.

As for the dividends, technically the taxpayers did gain from the companies that paid us back- the banks (GMAC, the GSEs, and some others haven't been able to pay us back, but the big banks all have.) The bailouts were not made in the form of stock purchase, but instead as loans and the government did get payments from the banks, with interest.

That does not mean it is right to use taxpayer money to create a moral hazard that in the long run might just cause more destruction (not to mention every company might not be able to pay us back as we are currently finding out with some of the bailed out corporations.)
They gave loans to the banks, they bought stock in everything else (hanse the term, nationalization). About 80% of AIG as I recall.
David is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 08:10 PM   #12
myp
Founding Father
 
myp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: US
Posts: 5,841

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
They gave loans to the banks, they bought stock in everything else (hanse the term, nationalization). About 80% of AIG as I recall.
Any assets they got are going to be held by the Fed or the government, depending on who bought them. Any dividends would also end up there. Just as the funds used were from the Fed/govt, the dividends are returned there. Technically the government is for the people, so they'd say its all for the taxpayer.
myp is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 08:28 PM   #13
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,661

Quote:
Originally Posted by myp View Post
Any assets they got are going to be held by the Fed or the government, depending on who bought them. Any dividends would also end up there. Just as the funds used were from the Fed/govt, the dividends are returned there. Technically the government is for the people, so they'd say its all for the taxpayer.
And until I see my check, that's BS.

Look, I'm no fan of bailouts but if they're going to happen, and if it's done with my money, I want to see something other then numbers from a cooked book to show for it, preferably hard cash or property.
David is offline  
Old March 28th, 2010, 09:16 PM   #14
myp
Founding Father
 
myp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: US
Posts: 5,841

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
And until I see my check, that's BS.

Look, I'm no fan of bailouts but if they're going to happen, and if it's done with my money, I want to see something other then numbers from a cooked book to show for it, preferably hard cash or property.
Well you aren't going to see that check Just as they didn't come to you specifically for a check for bailouts (just charged you generally with taxes and inflation,) they won't give you a check for it.

At the end of the day its nothing more than a moral hazard created by special interests and the idea that markets need to be saved.
myp is offline  
Old March 30th, 2010, 02:21 AM   #15
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
I don't have a problem with bailouts considering they stabilize the economy (if done right)
.... as well as being accounted for in a completely transparent manner. So far I have not seen one account yet of how the bailouts have been funded.
deanhills is offline  
Old March 30th, 2010, 10:06 AM   #16
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,661

Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
.... as well as being accounted for in a completely transparent manner. So far I have not seen one account yet of how the bailouts have been funded.
Thus I don't support the bailouts.
David is offline  
Old March 31st, 2010, 12:27 AM   #17
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
Thus I don't support the bailouts.
Right, they probably are just an excuse for expensive pay offs?
deanhills is offline  
Old March 31st, 2010, 05:29 PM   #18
Analyst
 
SpayAndNeuterLibs's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 52

Bailouts will never help stabilize the economy. They tend to inflate the economy.
SpayAndNeuterLibs is offline  
Old March 31st, 2010, 07:11 PM   #19
Anarchist
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
From: Disunited Queendom
Posts: 1,943

Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
.... as well as being accounted for in a completely transparent manner. So far I have not seen one account yet of how the bailouts have been funded.
I thought they were loans, which impact on the public deficit until they are paid back?

Or was that just a few of them?
Dirk is offline  
Old March 31st, 2010, 07:20 PM   #20
Analyst
 
SpayAndNeuterLibs's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 52

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk View Post
I thought they were loans, which impact on the public deficit until they are paid back?

Or was that just a few of them?
They may be called loans, but do you really think they will be paid back.
SpayAndNeuterLibs is offline  
Reply

  Political Fray > The Political Fray > Government and Politics

Tags
bailout , bair , dodd , end , nation



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trade deficits are ALLWAYS economically detrimental to their nation. Supposn Economics 38 August 27th, 2013 06:58 PM
If their is a civil unrest in a Muslim nation - White mans thinks it is their moral.. netanyahoo Government and Politics 1 October 30th, 2011 05:29 AM
Philippines, A Nation of Servants? GekiDan Current Events 55 May 14th, 2009 11:30 PM
Should we bailout newspapers? omej Government and Politics 32 May 2nd, 2009 05:58 AM
The Economy + The Bailout clash Government and Politics 16 January 27th, 2009 11:12 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2009-2013 Political Fray. All rights reserved.