The Political Fray - Political Forum
Go Back   Political Fray > The Political Fray > Government and Politics

Government and Politics Government and Politics Forum including laws, elections, government structure, and political theory


Thanks Tree1Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 18th, 2014, 04:32 PM   #1
Governor
 
arcturus88's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2012
From: NC
Posts: 2,212

caving in to North Korea

We have taken a cowardly approach wherein we now cave to the demands of terrorists, rather than fight their demands. its learned behavior dummies. if you give the rat a pellet, it will learn to repeat that rewarded behavior.


Romney: Release 'The Interview' for free online | TheHill

please share your thoughts.
arcturus88 is offline  
Old December 18th, 2014, 04:52 PM   #2
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 6,078

Totally agree.
David is offline  
Old December 18th, 2014, 10:24 PM   #3
Representative
 
ThirdTerm's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
From: The motherland
Posts: 263

Sony dropped the movie because a major distributor backed off from releasing the film as scheduled due to safety concerns. The Interview movie still could be released via a pay-per-view venue like Netflix, Amazon and Hulu to mitigate the threats of terrorising moviegoers and theatre owners.

BORKED
ThirdTerm is offline  
Old December 19th, 2014, 07:08 AM   #4
President
 
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: Central FL
Posts: 11,149

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcturus88 View Post
We have taken a cowardly approach
You got a mouse in your pocket?



"A" single company caved. No "we" about that. "We" are the people of the U.S.A., and did not cave.
Aufgeblassen is offline  
Old December 19th, 2014, 07:57 AM   #5
Governor
 
arcturus88's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2012
From: NC
Posts: 2,212

I take a more complex view of it.

a company (containing US citizens) was attacked by terrorists. it then becomes the governments task to defend its citizens. so what I advocate is the US taking a strong stance with Sony to defend their right of free speech to release.
arcturus88 is offline  
Old December 19th, 2014, 08:11 AM   #6
President
 
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: Central FL
Posts: 11,149

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcturus88 View Post
I take a more complex view of it.

a company (containing US citizens) was attacked by terrorists. it then becomes the governments task to defend its citizens. so what I advocate is the US taking a strong stance with Sony to defend their right of free speech to release.
We could always nuke Hanoi, then the hacking would stop.

Aufgeblassen is offline  
Old December 19th, 2014, 08:15 AM   #7
Representative
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 202

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdTerm View Post
Sony dropped the movie because a major distributor backed off from releasing the film as scheduled due to safety concerns. The Interview movie still could be released via a pay-per-view venue like Netflix, Amazon and Hulu to mitigate the threats of terrorising moviegoers and theatre owners. ...
ThirdTerm, each possible method of releasing the movie would renew the threat (alleged to be driven by the North Korea government) upon Sony and whoever they passed those rights on to.

if Sony releases a copy of the movie to the U.S. government with the rights for a year, the Federal government could make some DVD’s of the movie publically available at comparatively little expense. Even if they did so for a single month, enormous number of DVD copies would emerge from innumerable numbers of producers that would be sold by street vendors throughout the entire globe. Even if is possibly conceivable that the movie never plays in any theater and is never broadcasted over any medium, the movie that it’s alleged a government tried to suppress would be among the most (if not the most) widely viewed movies ever produced.

This scenario is a daydream that we cannot expect to be realized. Sony Corporation of America, (a subsidiary of Sony Corporation in Tokyo), would not profit from such a scheme. Despite the Romney’s opinion, corporations are not people. Even most people generally do not accept huge risks or reduction of their finances for patriotic or other altruistic reasons.
Additionally (although the movie has in effect been released beyond Sony’s control), Sony has reason to fear again being subjected to continuous cyber-attacks. North Korea’s motives would be revenge and establishing their commitment and power to carry out any threats; we should expect future threats against other enterprises or nations.

Regardless of how Sony acts or fails to act, it is necessary that we and our allies or even USA alone willingly devote possibly huge expenditures, (comparable to our expenditures for the building the first atomic bombs or our space programs), all devoted to finding an effective shielding from such cyber-attacks. This has now been established as a very real threats our national security.

Respectfully, Supposn
Supposn is offline  
Old December 19th, 2014, 08:18 PM   #8
Governor
 
Polydectes's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2013
From: just past the moons of Jupiter
Posts: 2,234

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcturus88 View Post
I take a more complex view of it.

a company (containing US citizens) was attacked by terrorists. it then becomes the governments task to defend its citizens. so what I advocate is the US taking a strong stance with Sony to defend their right of free speech to release.
It wasn't attacked it was just a threat.

We need to meet a threat with a promise. Something to the extent "for every terrorist attack we will nuke one of your cities schools hospitals children and all."

We may have to make good on it once but once it occurs "terrorism" will be history.
Polydectes is offline  
Old December 20th, 2014, 05:14 AM   #9
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 6,078

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polydectes View Post
It wasn't attacked it was just a threat.

We need to meet a threat with a promise. Something to the extent "for every terrorist attack we will nuke one of your cities schools hospitals children and all."

We may have to make good on it once but once it occurs "terrorism" will be history.
WW3 would be the more likely outcome.
David is offline  
Old December 20th, 2014, 08:24 AM   #10
President
 
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: Central FL
Posts: 11,149

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polydectes View Post
"for every terrorist attack we will nuke one of your cities schools hospitals children and all."
That is not how we operate as Americans. We should just say we will relentlessly bomb their military complex until they surrender and/or their leader is DEAD.
Aufgeblassen is offline  
Old December 20th, 2014, 08:25 AM   #11
President
 
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: Central FL
Posts: 11,149

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
WW3 would be the more likely outcome.
Not hardly. NC has no real allies.
Aufgeblassen is offline  
Old December 20th, 2014, 12:07 PM   #12
Governor
 
arcturus88's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2012
From: NC
Posts: 2,212

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polydectes View Post
It wasn't attacked it was just a threat.
There WAS a cyber attack AND a threat for further 9-11 type attack.
arcturus88 is offline  
Old December 20th, 2014, 07:23 PM   #13
Representative
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 202

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polydectes View Post
It wasn't attacked it was just a threat.

We need to meet a threat with a promise. Something to the extent "for every terrorist attack we will nuke one of your cities schools hospitals children and all."

We may have to make good on it once but once it occurs "terrorism" will be history.
Polydectes, certainly it was an actual cyber-terrorist attack.

Regarding the creditability of the threats, thus far the terrorists have successfully accomplished every promised act if any of their demands were not satisfied. The cyber-terrorists had further threatened Sony if Sony ceased satisfying their demands.

Some of the hacked data is of embarrassments to Sony and to others. Much of the embarrassments are of financial consequences to those enterprises and individuals.
The releasing of that illegally obtained data certainly was of huge financial detriment to the Sony Corporation.

We hope that we will deliver Obama’s promise of appropriately retaliating at the time and place of our choosing.

Knowing and positively confirming North Korea’s involvement are different matters and “gunboat diplomacy” is no longer effective.

Warfare is now being conducted by gangs or cells of people within many nations. These individuals and small groups are only slightly affiliated or often not affiliated with each other.
They drift over borders or fly as individual airline passengers among many similarly appearing passengers with similarly unremarkable documents of identification. You suggest “nuking” a city to kill half dozen persons that are not unlikely to be opposed to the government of the city and of the nation you propose we attack?

Respectfully, Supposn
Supposn is offline  
Old December 21st, 2014, 01:54 AM   #14
Secretary of State
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2012
From: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 4,724

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supposn View Post
Polydectes, certainly it was an actual cyber-terrorist attack.

Regarding the creditability of the threats, thus far the terrorists have successfully accomplished every promised act if any of their demands were not satisfied. The cyber-terrorists had further threatened Sony if Sony ceased satisfying their demands.

Some of the hacked data is of embarrassments to Sony and to others. Much of the embarrassments are of financial consequences to those enterprises and individuals.
The releasing of that illegally obtained data certainly was of huge financial detriment to the Sony Corporation.

We hope that we will deliver Obama’s promise of appropriately retaliating at the time and place of our choosing.

Knowing and positively confirming North Korea’s involvement are different matters and “gunboat diplomacy” is no longer effective.

Warfare is now being conducted by gangs or cells of people within many nations. These individuals and small groups are only slightly affiliated or often not affiliated with each other.
They drift over borders or fly as individual airline passengers among many similarly appearing passengers with similarly unremarkable documents of identification. You suggest “nuking” a city to kill half dozen persons that are not unlikely to be opposed to the government of the city and of the nation you propose we attack?

Respectfully, Supposn
Sony should simply give the movie away to the internet.

They are out the money anyway....and that would shove it right where the sun don't shine for NK.
tecoyah is online now  
Old December 21st, 2014, 04:36 AM   #15
Representative
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Cliffside Park, NJ
Posts: 202

Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah View Post
Sony should simply give the movie away to the internet.

They are out the money anyway....and that would shove it right where the sun don't shine for NK.
Tecoyah, (excerpted from post #7. Respectfully, Supposn

ThirdTerm, each possible method of releasing the movie would renew the threat (alleged to be driven by the North Korea government) upon Sony and whoever they passed those rights on to. …
Sony Corporation of America, (a subsidiary of Sony Corporation in Tokyo), would not profit from such a scheme. Despite the Romney’s opinion, corporations are not people. Even most people generally do not accept huge risks or reduction of their finances for patriotic or other altruistic reasons.
Additionally (although the movie has in effect been released beyond Sony’s control), Sony has reason to fear again being subjected to continuous cyber-attacks. North Korea’s motives would be revenge and establishing their commitment and power to carry out any threats.
Supposn is offline  
Old December 21st, 2014, 05:02 AM   #16
President
 
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: Central FL
Posts: 11,149

The best bet is to just topple the regime.
Aufgeblassen is offline  
Old December 22nd, 2014, 08:04 AM   #17
Senator
 
7forever's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
From: Midwest
Posts: 575

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcturus88 View Post
I take a more complex view of it.

a company (containing US citizens) was attacked by terrorists. it then becomes the governments task to defend its citizens. so what I advocate is the US taking a strong stance with Sony to defend their right of free speech to release.
I don't know enough about it. NK denies hacking and we say they did. IDK.
7forever is offline  
Old December 22nd, 2014, 08:17 AM   #18
President
 
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: Central FL
Posts: 11,149

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
I don't know enough about it. NK denies hacking and we say they did. IDK.
I'm sure we don't just "say" they did it. There must be irrefutable evidence.

Aufgeblassen is offline  
Old December 23rd, 2014, 10:30 PM   #19
Governor
 
Polydectes's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2013
From: just past the moons of Jupiter
Posts: 2,234

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
WW3 would be the more likely outcome.
Doubt it.
Polydectes is offline  
Old December 23rd, 2014, 10:44 PM   #20
Governor
 
Polydectes's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2013
From: just past the moons of Jupiter
Posts: 2,234

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supposn View Post
Polydectes, certainly it was an actual cyber-terrorist attack.

Regarding the creditability of the threats, thus far the terrorists have successfully accomplished every promised act if any of their demands were not satisfied. The cyber-terrorists had further threatened Sony if Sony ceased satisfying their demands.

Some of the hacked data is of embarrassments to Sony and to others. Much of the embarrassments are of financial consequences to those enterprises and individuals.
The releasing of that illegally obtained data certainly was of huge financial detriment to the Sony Corporation.

We hope that we will deliver Obama’s promise of appropriately retaliating at the time and place of our choosing.

Knowing and positively confirming North Korea’s involvement are different matters and “gunboat diplomacy” is no longer effective.

Warfare is now being conducted by gangs or cells of people within many nations. These individuals and small groups are only slightly affiliated or often not affiliated with each other.
They drift over borders or fly as individual airline passengers among many similarly appearing passengers with similarly unremarkable documents of identification. You suggest “nuking” a city to kill half dozen persons that are not unlikely to be opposed to the government of the city and of the nation you propose we attack?

Respectfully, Supposn
I don't believe you. I don't buy that it is just a group of independent people.

And if it is being conducted by gangs, invade and slaughter.

I have heard the conspiracy theory, there may be something to that.
Polydectes is offline  
Reply

  Political Fray > The Political Fray > Government and Politics

Tags
caving , korea , north



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
North Korea and South Korea exchange artillery fire myp Current Events 18 August 25th, 2011 01:07 PM
North Korea is Not a Good Neighbor obtuseobserver Current Events 0 November 28th, 2010 10:45 PM
What can we actually do about North Korea? curious Current Events 19 July 2nd, 2009 12:40 AM
US Journalists on Trial in North Korea deanhills Current Events 1 June 4th, 2009 05:21 AM
North Korea Can Wipe Out the U.S.? Dodong Current Events 14 March 21st, 2009 01:31 AM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2009-2013 Political Fray. All rights reserved.