The Political Fray - Political Forum
Go Back   Political Fray > The Political Fray > History

History Historical Discussions - For discussion about the great (and not-so-great) happenings of history


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 18th, 2010, 11:05 PM   #1
myp
Founding Father
 
myp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: us
Posts: 5,841

Who is the most influential person in history?

Who do you think has had the greatest impact, for better or for worse, on the world?

This just sort of popped into my head and I thought I'd ask everyone here. It is a tough question and I will have to get back to you guys on my answer after I think about it a bit more. Interested in hearing who everyone picks though.
myp is offline  
Old January 18th, 2010, 11:11 PM   #2
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,485

Quote:
Originally Posted by myp View Post
Who do you think has had the greatest impact, for better or for worse, on the world?

This just sort of popped into my head and I thought I'd ask everyone here. It is a tough question and I will have to get back to you guys on my answer after I think about it a bit more. Interested in hearing who everyone picks though.
They guy that invented farming.
David is offline  
Old January 19th, 2010, 04:55 AM   #3
Congressional Leader
 
DodgeFB's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Undisclosed
Posts: 2,751

Maybe the first one to use fire.
DodgeFB is offline  
Old January 19th, 2010, 08:00 AM   #4
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,485

Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgeFB View Post
Maybe the first one to use fire.
Different species.
David is offline  
Old January 19th, 2010, 04:56 PM   #5
Representative
 
Delta's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 369

I'd have to say Jesus. Even if it isn't him specifically that had/has the greatest impact, it's the stories about him and the belief in him that did/does.

There was a quote from a geology class I took about a person (whom I can't remember the name of but I'm trying to google it) that basically went "no single organism has had a greater negative impact on the world than this man." I'll look into it.
Delta is offline  
Old January 19th, 2010, 07:20 PM   #6
Anarchist
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
From: Disunited Queendom
Posts: 1,944

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta View Post
I'd have to say Jesus. Even if it isn't him specifically that had/has the greatest impact, it's the stories about him and the belief in him that did/does.

There was a quote from a geology class I took about a person (whom I can't remember the name of but I'm trying to google it) that basically went "no single organism has had a greater negative impact on the world than this man." I'll look into it.
Might i point out that there is no evidence that Jesus existed?

It's possible - even likely - that it was based on a living person... Possibly along the same lines as King Arthur - he might have been an actual person, but did he fight dragons and befriend warlocks? I think not.

But there are no written contemporary accounts and we have no letters written by him.
Dirk is offline  
Old January 20th, 2010, 03:44 AM   #7
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Challenging question, given that all of the influential people had limited lifespans, so probably we need to measure their prominence relative to the time that they had been infuential. So I would venture a guess, Genghis Khan/Hitler/Stalin/Peter the Great?
deanhills is offline  
Old January 20th, 2010, 08:59 AM   #8
Anarchist
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
From: Disunited Queendom
Posts: 1,944

Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
Challenging question, given that all of the influential people had limited lifespans, so probably we need to measure their prominence relative to the time that they had been infuential. So I would venture a guess, Genghis Khan/Hitler/Stalin/Peter the Great?
It's also certain sections of society. Hitler influenced the European left and motivated it against fascism and racism. Stalin showed the left the importance of democracy and the danger of suffocating levels of state control. Peter the Great influenced certain groups of fascists (which are surprisingly progressive and anti-racist).
Dirk is offline  
Old January 20th, 2010, 09:40 AM   #9
Vice President
 
David's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Opa Locka
Posts: 5,485

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk View Post
It's also certain sections of society. Hitler influenced the European left and motivated it against fascism and racism. Stalin showed the left the importance of democracy and the danger of suffocating levels of state control. Peter the Great influenced certain groups of fascists (which are surprisingly progressive and anti-racist).
Like the Green Nazi Party here in the US? Quite an interesting bunch.
David is offline  
Old January 20th, 2010, 03:38 PM   #10
Representative
 
Delta's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 369

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk View Post
Might i point out that there is no evidence that Jesus existed?

It's possible - even likely - that it was based on a living person... Possibly along the same lines as King Arthur - he might have been an actual person, but did he fight dragons and befriend warlocks? I think not.

But there are no written contemporary accounts and we have no letters written by him.
Well, being an atheist, I'm aware of this. Regardless of whether he was real or not, I'd say he's still one of the most influential people in history.
Delta is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2010, 09:36 PM   #11
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta View Post
Well, being an atheist, I'm aware of this. Regardless of whether he was real or not, I'd say he's still one of the most influential people in history.
Maybe we could then rather change it to God, whether Christian, Moslem or whatever religion. Religion has to have been the most influential from the beginning of time.
deanhills is offline  
Old January 24th, 2010, 06:30 AM   #12
Anarchist
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
From: Disunited Queendom
Posts: 1,944

Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
Maybe we could then rather change it to God, whether Christian, Moslem or whatever religion. Religion has to have been the most influential from the beginning of time.
Or gods. Don't forget polytheistic religions.

I suppose religion was probably almost inevitable. There were always going to be things we didn't understand, eh? Always will, i reckon.
Dirk is offline  
Old January 26th, 2010, 02:54 AM   #13
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk View Post
Or gods. Don't forget polytheistic religions.
Right! All of them. Or maybe more like their disciples who did the influencing with religion as a tool.
deanhills is offline  
Old February 4th, 2010, 06:28 PM   #14
GOP
Representative
 
GOP's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
From: United Kingdom
Posts: 360

It's very difficult to say exactly one person who has been most influential. But I personally believe that Churchill, Reagan and Thatcher are among the people who are most influential in the world. My basis for saying exactly these three are that Churchill turned a naive Britain into a serious Britain, and Churchill knew exactly what he needed to do to prevent Hitler to take over Europe. Same with Reagan and Thatcher, they did what they needed to do to finally stop the Russians after 40 years of an intense and cold war.
GOP is offline  
Old February 5th, 2010, 03:11 PM   #15
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOP View Post
It's very difficult to say exactly one person who has been most influential. But I personally believe that Churchill, Reagan and Thatcher are among the people who are most influential in the world. My basis for saying exactly these three are that Churchill turned a naive Britain into a serious Britain, and Churchill knew exactly what he needed to do to prevent Hitler to take over Europe. Same with Reagan and Thatcher, they did what they needed to do to finally stop the Russians after 40 years of an intense and cold war.
Hmmm .... two out of the three are from Great Britain. Me thinks there has to be some bias here ....

Seriously though. Churchill was good for the UK and for the War effort, I can't say he had much influence after that. In fact after WWII British influence went completely South in a vertical dive. US influence shot up in a vertical projectile. If we are taking people during the War time I would say Roosevelt had lots of influence. While Maggie Thatcher was in power her and Reagan had a good partnership as well as lots of influence, however not as far-reaching as Bush for example, even with him having been as unpopular as he had been.
deanhills is offline  
Old February 5th, 2010, 03:14 PM   #16
GOP
Representative
 
GOP's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
From: United Kingdom
Posts: 360

That the US had more influence after WWII, is something I completely with you on. But I wil say the UK definitely has had a lot of power after WWII, most of the British colonies didn't declare themselves independent before the 1960's.
GOP is offline  
Old February 5th, 2010, 03:54 PM   #17
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOP View Post
That the US had more influence after WWII, is something I completely with you on. But I wil say the UK definitely has had a lot of power after WWII, most of the British colonies didn't declare themselves independent before the 1960's.
Technically most of them were independent even before WWII and had some kind of self-Government. The sixties were just formalities and an excuse for beautiful postage stamps.
deanhills is offline  
Old February 5th, 2010, 04:25 PM   #18
GOP
Representative
 
GOP's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
From: United Kingdom
Posts: 360

True, but the influence was great. Remember part of the British influence is even something the Americans didn't even manage to defeat.
GOP is offline  
Old February 6th, 2010, 06:44 AM   #19
Representative
 
Joined: May 2009
From: USA
Posts: 225

If I could ?see those Ancients, who were most renowned for their Wit and Learning? like Lemuel Gulliver in his account of Glubbdubdrib on his Voyage to Laputa in Gulliver?s Travels, or meet the great personages of history (e.g., Julius Caesar, Jesus Christ, etc.), I would forsake them all for but one hour?s conversation with Samuel Johnson.
Nemo is offline  
Old February 8th, 2010, 01:17 AM   #20
Secretary of State
 
deanhills's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOP View Post
True, but the influence was great. Remember part of the British influence is even something the Americans didn't even manage to defeat.
Perhaps the British thought that, but the rest of the world thought they were on the wane. Took quite a while to sink in!
deanhills is offline  
Reply

  Political Fray > The Political Fray > History

Tags
history , influential , person



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Piers Morgan Debates another Pro Gun person. chris7375 Current Events 0 January 11th, 2013 10:19 AM
This Day In History Comet History 4 February 12th, 2012 11:06 PM
one of the most influential sociologists and philosophers in the world RonPrice Philosophy 0 January 7th, 2011 09:32 PM
History in colleges prasanth5 History 0 May 16th, 2010 10:19 PM


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed



Copyright © 2009-2013 Political Fray. All rights reserved.