Appeasement of Jihad Handcuffed the FBI

Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
I received this email from Act for America (and thus cannot provide the link). Here it is in it's entirety, complete with an extremely important video, worth watching for 6 minutes.

"Last year we put out a series of emails describing the purge of any references to radical Islam in federal government counterterrorism materials.

This didn’t happen by accident. It’s the result of a conscious and deliberate policy decision at the highest levels of the Obama administration.

Please view the short video below, put out by our friends at EMET.

We now know that Russian authorities wire tapped a phone call between Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his mother, in which they discussed “jihad.” This phone call was part of the reason the Russians alerted the FBI about Tsarnaev.

Had John Brennan, now our CIA director, listened in on this phone call, he almost certainly would have dismissed any concerns about Tsarnaev.

Why? Because Brennan has stated publicly he believes the notion that “jihad” is connected to terrorism is false. Brennan believes “jihad” is a “holy tenet” of Islam, because he claims it refers only to personal improvement.

Or what our friend Dr. Walid Phares calls “Islamic yoga.”

This administration refuses to acknowledge any jihadist ideology behind Islamic terrorism. The short video below is a must-see in this regard.

We can only speculate what might have happened when the FBI investigated Tamerlan Tsarnaev if our counterterrorism strategy included identifying jihadist ideology as a prime motivator of jihadist attacks.

But since the FBI can’t consider jihadist ideology when it does such investigations, it’s no wonder it dropped its investigation of Tamerlan Tsarnaev."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VKuRBPY9TCo
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
So because people stopped listening to mosque bombing, Quran burning, Bible thumping religious crazies who make shit up and then use it to scare people, you're angry? Jihad isn't 'holy war'. Furthermore, most terrorists aren't Muslim and so the Islamic-centric view that has taken hold has resulted in serious holes in our national security, so any attempt to turn 'Islamic Terrorism' into terrorism is only a good thing. Houston and Tuscan, both of which had long paper trails and large internet footprints, would never have happened if HS looked for such threats as closely as they do Muslims.
 
Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
So because people stopped listening to mosque bombing, Quran burning, Bible thumping religious crazies who make shit up and then use it to scare people, you're angry? Jihad isn't 'holy war'. Furthermore, most terrorists aren't Muslim and so the Islamic-centric view that has taken hold has resulted in serious holes in our national security, so any attempt to turn 'Islamic Terrorism' into terrorism is only a good thing. Houston and Tuscan, both of which had long paper trails and large internet footprints, would never have happened if HS looked for such threats as closely as they do Muslims.


1. Jihad is holy war, and if you've been reined into the co-optation idea that jihad is some self-improvement or whatever strange thing they're trying to pass it off as, you can call the Islamic terrorism by some other name. The name isn't really all that big, except that when the Tsarnaevs were talking about jihad, you can bet they weren't talking about some psychological thing.

2. this thread isn't about what most terrorism is or isn't but I've seen no evidence to show anything about that, including from you.

3. I'm not angry. I'm just stating things as they are - that the FBI is handcuffed by appeasement to Muslims (the TOPIC of this thread if you don't mind), and that is what led to their mishandling of the Tsarnaev case, leading to 4 US deaths. Maybe I should be angry. I guess I've just known about this for too long to be angry any more. Disturbing to see the appeasement and resulting hands-off outlook of the FBI, knowing this is going to lead to more bombings, and maybe the next ones will be nuclear, as al Qaeda has been talking about for years. Don't tell you have no knowledge of that either.

4. You seem to have things backward. It is the Muslims who are not being looked at (or dealt with), not the non-Muslims. What do you think we're talking about here ?
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
1. Jihad is holy war, and if you've been reined into the co-optation idea that jihad is some self-improvement or whatever strange thing they're trying to pass it off as, you can call the Islamic terrorism by some other name. The name isn't really all that big, except that when the Tsarnaevs were talking about jihad, you can bet they weren't talking about some psychological thing.

2. this thread isn't about what most terrorism is or isn't but I've seen no evidence to show anything about that, including from you.

3. I'm not angry. I'm just stating things as they are - that the FBI is handcuffed by appeasement to Muslims (the TOPIC of this thread if you don't mind), and that is what led to their mishandling of the Tsarnaev case, leading to 4 US deaths. Maybe I should be angry. I guess I've just known about this for too long to be angry any more. Disturbing to see the appeasement and resulting hands-off outlook of the FBI, knowing this is going to lead to more bombings, and maybe the next ones will be nuclear, as al Qaeda has been talking about for years. Don't tell you have no knowledge of that either.

4. You seem to have things backward. It is the Muslims who are not being looked at (or dealt with), not the non-Muslims. What do you think we're talking about here ?

The Muslims AREN'T being scrutinized? We have a concentration camp filled with them, you lost all credibility in this topic.
 
Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
The Muslims AREN'T being scrutinized? We have a concentration camp filled with them, you lost all credibility in this topic.

You heard me right. If I had more time, I could write you a book right here about all the overtolerance of Islam, and it's seditious Isalmization (AKA Stealth Jihad). Most people are oblivious to it, because it gets so little (if any ) press, due to the media's fear of Islamist attack (violent, boycotts, threats, lawsuits, controversy, etc). As a result, they leave it alone, and hundreds of cases don't get reported.

How many people know the names Lina Morales, Michael Graham, Phil Alden Robinson, Thomas Klocek, Major Stephen Coughlin, Walid Elkhatib, Masud Khan, Abdi Mohamed, David Dawson, Sally Ramsey, and Peter DiGangi ?

If you don't know these names (well known to protectionists), you're not versed in Muslim accomodation in America. Know where and what the infamous "Mole House" is ? if not, enter this discussion when you do. Problem is, when it comes to leaving Muslims alone, as a policy, most Americans don't know how much they don't know.
 
Top