YahooNews!
Thankfully not all of them. Worst part for me is that they are now farming fish, and one sometimes does not know what the difference is.
The health nuts fear that farmed fish could develop diseases, as well as unfriendly organisms. People in the health industry advise that not only is salmon from the ocean more healthy, but it has to be wild salmon.
I'm reading your comment with great interest. As I love salmon and my favourite for taste is Atlantic Salmon. Another claim they make is that the colour of the farmed fish is usually a sickly grey/white, so they have to use additives to give them the pink colour. There are some good farmers however that use natural microbes to give the salmon its pink flesh. But the ones with the additives are in the majority?Yes, because Samoan that isn't monitored and, when sick, medicated back to health, is so much better for you.
Look, the same people that make that claim said that farmers were using dangerous vaccines to treat sick fish stocks, never mind the illness in question was bacterial and the antibiotic used proven harmless to humans.
Now in flavor wild is better. I'll not say otherwise. But these health claims are like the organic claims (no real nutritional difference) which is to say total BS. You know who benefits from all the scares? Fishermen. You know who's paying the lobbyists? Fi... Well do I really need to say it?
What does sustainable mean in the context of fish farming and why would fish farming on the coast be more sustainable? What are you comparing it with?
