Where to be born 2013

Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
The Economist's calculated suggestion. Germany and the US tie for 16.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2013/01/daily-chart

Ah, Switzerland. Fallout bunkers for 140% of the population, underground military bases built to survive a nuke attack, a natural wall around the whole country, no ill will in the world, the RCC obligated to them for their military support and everyone is filthy rich. Not surprised they made #1, expected it to be them or Norway.
 
Dec 2012
8
0
Switzerland does not surprise me either. I have two very close friends who live there. I am a bit curious about Finland being marked 11. I figured they would be lower than that.
 
May 2012
215
37
The motherland
GDP at purchasing power parity per capita is the most important factor to determine the ranking, which is why only small economies such as Swiss and Australia made the top ten list but there is a boredom factor living in countries with small populations and it's undeniably more culturally stimulating to live in more populous European countries such as France, Britain and Germany.

Quibblers will, of course, find more holes in all this than there are in a chunk of Swiss cheese. America was helped to the top spot back in 1988 by the inclusion in the ranking of a “philistine factor” (for cultural poverty) and a “yawn index” (the degree to which a country might, despite all its virtues, be irredeemably boring). Switzerland scored terribly on both counts. In the film “The Third Man”, Orson Welles’s character, the rogue Harry Lime, famously says that Italy for 30 years had war, terror and murder under the Borgias but in that time produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance; Switzerland had 500 years of peace and democracy—and produced the cuckoo clock.
http://www.economist.com/news/21566430-where-be-born-2013-lottery-life
 
Last edited:

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
GDP at purchasing power parity per capita is the most important factor to determine the ranking, which is why only small economies such as Swiss and Australia made the top ten list but there is a boredom factor living in countries with small populations and it's undeniably more culturally stimulating to live in more populous European countries such as France, Britain and Germany.

Everyone is going to weigh things differently since it is a subjective conclusion in the end, but they did account for population surveys of happiness. That being said, how different would living in Switzerland be from living in England, France, or Germany given they are all in Europe- if you are willing to travel even slightly, the boring culture thing probably won't affect you in Switzerland- for Australia, perhaps.
 
Top