Imagine...actual Conspiracy!

Jul 26, 2009
5,666
406
Opa Locka
#21
How is it that you reached that conclusion
that is the PENTAGON was not the primary target?

If indeed the wall of the pentagon had been re-enforced
to resist missile attack, please note that an aluminum airliner
is NOT a missile and can not be expected to perform as a missile,
therefore ... WHY the total penetration by said airliner?
there is something VERY wrong with this picture.
The whole place held up for hours with all it's supports and foundation knocked out... There is nothing 'wrong with this picture', your just spouting BS and hoping something actually sticks.
 
Oct 15, 2013
60
16
Midwest
#22
Open Question for ALL:

Do you really & truly believe that 19 suicidal Arab fanatics
hijacked 4 airliners & crashed 3 of them into buildings?
one of those buildings being the PENTAGON, that is
the worlds greatest military power FAILED to defend even its own HQ
your tax dollars at work, a Defense Department that FAILS to defend.....
oh my!

Space ............................ the final frontier ........
To be fair we only know of 4 suicidal Arabs, the other 15 may not have been in on the whole suicide thing but considering that there are people in the Middle East who will put on and then detonate an explosive vest just to harm a few people in an open air market I'd have to say yes, it shouldn't be too difficult to find 19 guys who would jump at the chance to kill thousands of Americans on American soil.

The Pentagon doesn't have a magic force field around it and I have no problem believing that they weren't looking out for an attack by commercial airliner. I think they are now though.
 
Likes: 1 person
Sep 8, 2013
44
1
Castro Valley CA
#23
I can understand that the PENTAGON doesn't have any sort of force field around it, HOWEVER, given the fact that for more than half an hour, it was known that AMERICA was under attack, that is after the second hit to the WTC made it obvious that the hit was no accident.... What, that is exactly what was the worlds greatest military power doing to defend itself, given that the scope of the attack was totally unknown, how many aircraft were being preped for flight? We the people have a right to know how our tax dollars are being spent, if the state of affairs was known to have been
"AMERICA is under attack" and nobody would lift a finger to defend our Capital, what sort of statement does that make?

there is another bit to all of this that is VERY suspicious, & that is not one of the alleged hijacked airliners reset their transponder codes to the "we B hijacked" code. WHY?
 
Sep 8, 2013
44
1
Castro Valley CA
#24
The whole place held up for hours with all it's supports and foundation knocked out... There is nothing 'wrong with this picture', your just spouting BS and hoping something actually sticks.
are you referring to the PENTAGON
or possibly WTC7 ?

enquiring minds ..... & all that rot!
 
Jul 26, 2009
5,666
406
Opa Locka
#25
are you referring to the PENTAGON
or possibly WTC7 ?

enquiring minds ..... & all that rot!
Yes the Pentagon, you know, that building that held up for so long everyone was able to evacuate with only they people on the plane and at the impact site dying? The whole attack is well documented, feel free to rewatch it if you need a refresher on what happened that day.
 
Oct 15, 2013
60
16
Midwest
#26
I can understand that the PENTAGON doesn't have any sort of force field around it, HOWEVER, given the fact that for more than half an hour, it was known that AMERICA was under attack, that is after the second hit to the WTC made it obvious that the hit was no accident.... What, that is exactly what was the worlds greatest military power doing to defend itself, given that the scope of the attack was totally unknown, how many aircraft were being preped for flight? We the people have a right to know how our tax dollars are being spent, if the state of affairs was known to have been
"AMERICA is under attack" and nobody would lift a finger to defend our Capital, what sort of statement does that make?

there is another bit to all of this that is VERY suspicious, & that is not one of the alleged hijacked airliners reset their transponder codes to the "we B hijacked" code. WHY?
Figure 5 minutes to scramble the fighters, another 5 for orders. Then you have to identify the target because it's not like the hijackers said "lock on to our transponder because we are going to crash into the Pentagon". Once you acquire the target...where do you shoot it down? You believe the airliner should have been shot down over the eastern seaboard, the most densely populated part of America? Nothing you have proposed indicates the presence of conspiracy, in fact I think it shows that the government kept it's cool during a very stressful and confusing time.
 
Likes: 1 person
Sep 8, 2013
44
1
Castro Valley CA
#27
Yes the Pentagon, you know, that building that held up for so long everyone was able to evacuate with only they people on the plane and at the impact site dying? The whole attack is well documented, feel free to rewatch it if you need a refresher on what happened that day.
"FLT77" crash 9:40 AM
Collapse event 10:10 AM

Thank U very much ......
 
Sep 8, 2013
44
1
Castro Valley CA
#28
Figure 5 minutes to scramble the fighters, another 5 for orders. Then you have to identify the target because it's not like the hijackers said "lock on to our transponder because we are going to crash into the Pentagon". Once you acquire the target...where do you shoot it down? You believe the airliner should have been shot down over the eastern seaboard, the most densely populated part of America? Nothing you have proposed indicates the presence of conspiracy, in fact I think it shows that the government kept it's cool during a very stressful and confusing time.
The vast majority of times when the AirForce has to deal with an off course airliner, they only need to get into visual range and get the pilot to change course, the fact that this was not even attempted, speaks volumes!
 
Oct 15, 2013
60
16
Midwest
#29
The vast majority of times when the AirForce has to deal with an off course airliner, they only need to get into visual range and get the pilot to change course, the fact that this was not even attempted, speaks volumes!
Alright, let's go with this reasoning.

How do you know it wasn't attempted? You seem to think that you're in the loop regarding 9/11 even though I'm having trouble verifying your "information" online and even when I do find it, it's always considered to be a minority opinion yet you hold to it like it's the Gospel.

If it had been done and the airliner refused to alter course, where do you propose shooting down an airliner in that area?

BTW, don't for a second think that I haven't noticed you continually shifting focus and changing the issue at hand. Your initial question was whether or not anybody believes that 19 Arabs would fly planes into buildings. That's been answered...do you have a rebuttal to that or are you willing to cede the point? Once that's been dealt with then we can move on to other questions.
 
Sep 8, 2013
44
1
Castro Valley CA
#31
>Originally Posted by David

>The whole place held up for hours with all it's supports and foundation
>knocked out... There is nothing 'wrong with this picture', your just spouting
>BS and hoping something actually sticks.

Hours? .....

Did you notice the angle that the alleged "FLT77"
was said to have hit the Pentagon?
the damage & wreckage is inconsistent with the
crash of an airliner ......

have a nice day

: )