JFK assassination and the CIA

Oct 7, 2012
1,916
383
NC
Tecoyah, It's not impossible that 5 people killed im at the same time. it could happen.

anyways ignore him 7forever. please clear up the details. you've painted the bulk picture.

please pick your choice for person and reason.



LBJ: to rise to power and revenge for john and bobby's mistreatment/ridicule of him as a country bumpkin

Jacky O': revenge for multiple affairs

Soviet Union: revenge for showdown over Cuba

Castro: revenge for JFK's assassination attempt on him

Oswald: crazy kid used by one of the above

(other: please describe)
 
Oct 11, 2010
562
4
Midwest
I clearly see rhe front of the head blasting out, as this is the exit wound. Exit wounds are always much bigger than entrance wounds.


You have been asked not to post these graphic images..please refrain going forward


The front of his head was clear of damage. That, according to all the evidence except the x-rays. The rear exploded just as I've described for years. Frames 313, 319, and 320 all show the damage to the rear. I'd love to see any fact denier argue with Jackie's bullet proof account of the rear skull being badly damaged. You got no guts, nor any facts to back your delusions. The bullet entered just above the right eye, which blasted out the right rear.

Jackie, being the closest eyewitness after the shot, makes her testimony very important in locating exactly where the exit wound was. She describes what so many others did, and now she's confirmed correct by exposing the rear exit wound was always visible in frame 313.

"I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing --- I suppose there must have been.

"But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."

Dallas, TX -- August 5, 2001 -- JFK Lancer, an historical research firm reports that the Court Reporter's tape shows Jacqueline Kennedy's testimony before the Warren Commission had additional descriptions which were withheld.

Junkkarinen adds, "Why they would withhold an accurate description is open to debate, but the fact that they put out an altered transcript is telling. How many other transcripts may have fallen victim to the same shenanigans? This is a find that proves alteration of original evidence, and that is important.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oct 11, 2010
562
4
Midwest
You cannot rewrite history. What happen has been well investigated and well documented. You have not a single leg to stand. So how 'bout getting a life instead of wasting your time on this crap???!!!

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/43/5a/09/435a09849928[/QUOTE]

You cannot change facts. What happen has been well investigated and well documented. You have not a single leg to stand. So how 'bout getting a life instead of wasting your time on being a stupid person?
 
Oct 11, 2010
562
4
Midwest
If what you speculate is actually true, as important as the facts are, they would have been mentioned on the PBS documentary, which was TOTAL INDEPENDENT of the government or other biases. Since it was not, it simply DID NOT HAPPEN - case closed. :smug:
No speculation whatsoever. Was Jackie wrong when she said the back was badly damaged? Please feel free to make your reply as stupid as you wish.
 
Oct 25, 2012
3,775
614
Louisville, Ky
No speculation whatsoever. Was Jackie wrong when she said the back was badly damaged? Please feel free to make your reply as stupid as you wish.
A bullet wound generally causes quite a bit of damage....that is why people die from them.
 
Oct 11, 2010
562
4
Midwest
The bullet entered above the right eye, which is corroborated by all three films and Chaney's up-close view of the President. All eyes by those men were fixed on the car because Greer suddenly pumped the brakes. Jfk was shot in the back right before the headshot, which is depicted more clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

JFK: First shot disinformation - Part 2

Let’s begin with James Chaney.
Chaney was the motorcycle Officer riding to the right rear of President Kennedy’s limousine - in the inboard position. Despite being the closet non-limousine witness to the assassination – he was never called to testify before the Warren Commission! Following the assassination, he was interviewed by Bill Lord from WFAA –TV. This is how he described the shooting:

“We had proceeded west on Elm Street at approximately 15-20 miles per hour. We heard the first shot. I thought it was a motorcycle backfiring and uh I looked back over to my left and also President Kennedy looked back over his left shoulder. Then, the, uh, second shot came, well, then I looked back just in time to see the President struck in the face by the second bullet. He slumped forward into Mrs. Kennedy’s lap, and uh, it was apparent to me that we were being fired upon.



 
Oct 11, 2010
562
4
Midwest
Not until very recently did I realize that jfk was shot in the back right before the headshot. My focus was always on the exit wound and the headshot with some work put into the bullet hole in the windshield. I never had strong feelings about the last 2 shots, but mostly believed one was fired to confuse those on elm street.

Everything important has finally come together and makes perfect sense for the universal belief that the president was shot three times. Two of those shots coming from the front make any rear shooter totally irrelevant. This new evidence is the only way the government would ever revise this case because they could simply add a gunshot wound without changing any prior conclusions from decades ago.

The back shot had to come from a different shooter because there wasn't enough time to get off another shot, as the last 2 shots were separated by less than a 1/4 second. It takes at least 3/4 of a second between shots.

JFK: Statement of Glen A. Bennett, eyewitness to the assassination of John F. Kennedy

"At this point I heard what sounded like a fire-cracker. I immediately looked from the right/crowd/physical area/and looked towards the President who was seated in the right rear seat of his limousine open convertible. At the moment I looked at the back of the President I heard another fire-cracker noise and saw the shot hit the President about four inches down from the right shoulder. A second shot followed immediately and hit the right rear high of the President's head."

How Five Investigations into JFK's Medical/Autopsy Evidence Got it Wrong - Discussion

Secret Service agent Glenn Bennett was riding in the follow up car. He was the first to document, in contemporaneous notes, Kennedy taking the back shot. He wrote, “"I looked at the back of the President. I heard another firecracker noise and saw that shot hit the President about four inches down from the right shoulder."[339] The Warren Commission accorded his observations “substantial weight,” writing, "Although [Bennett’s] formal statement was dated November 23, 1963, his notes indicate that he recorded what he saw and heard at 5:30 p.m., November 22, 1963, on the airplane en route back to Washington, prior to the autopsy, when it was not yet known that the President had been hit in the back.”[

For starters, the Zapruder film clearly shows jfk's back being impacted right before he's shot in the face. It kinda looks like a 'pow' from a batman episode. The other two films also show an impact but not quite the same way. What SS agent Glen Bennett reported seeing is exactly confirmed by all three films. For all intents and purposes the jfk assassination has finally been solved.