Yes they do either convict or acquit. The removal from Office is the punishment administered after they convict.
REAL Impeachment vs. The Current Faux One) Poll
- Thread starter RickyCusack
- Start date
In Nixon v. United States (1993) the Supreme Court decided that impeachment was a political process and is not subject to review by the judiciary.
Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993)
The political question doctrine is triggered when the text of the Constitution has shown that an issue lies outside the scope of the courts, or there is no judicial standard for resolving the issue.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Nixon was NEVER impeached. It never went that far. He resigned before he was. So it would be unprecedented if a President was impeached, then it went to Senate for trial, then was convicted, then punishment was removal from Office, and THEN the CONVICTION was appealed to SCOTUS.In Nixon v. United States (1993) the Supreme Court decided that impeachment was a political process and is not subject to review by the judiciary.
Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993)
The political question doctrine is triggered when the text of the Constitution has shown that an issue lies outside the scope of the courts, or there is no judicial standard for resolving the issue.supreme.justia.com
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The FULL House never voted to impeach Nixon. In order to be officially to be considered impeached, the entire House must have a majority of a yea vote. It is faux impeachment until then.
