GOP more open to minorities, says former Democratic congressman

Aug 2011
448
0
California
GOP more open to minorities, says former Democratic congressman
LINK and VIDEO: http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/23/g...ies-says-former-democratic-congressman-video/


Southern Democrats are losing clout and influence because they?re fighting for control over their shrinking bases while Republicans increasingly welcome individuals from minority groups, former Alabama Democratic Rep. Artur Davis told The Daily Caller.

?For whatever reason, [the GOP] appears today to be a party more open to the aspirations of those individuals,? Davis said.

Those up-and-coming Republican minority politicians include Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, he said.

Further west, Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval and New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, both Hispanic, are also Republicans.

One reason for this disparity, he said, is that southern Democratic politicians tend to emerge from majority-minority districts. That career path makes it difficult for them to appeal to centrist voters, he said.

?The Democratic Party has become very quick to say that people of color are not electable unless they?re running in a minority district and it is the Republican Party that now seems to be opening more doors,? he said......<SNIP>

Rest of story w/video: http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/23/g...ies-says-former-democratic-congressman-video/
 
Aug 2011
758
0
The GOP has not been "closed" to minorities. Minorities have signed up with the leftwing since FDR since it has offered minorities everything - including the anti-white discrimination from which they have benefitted immensely.
 
Aug 2011
448
0
California
The GOP has not been "closed" to minorities. Minorities have signed up with the leftwing since FDR since it has offered minorities everything - including the anti-white discrimination from which they have benefitted immensely.

You and I know that the GOP has not been "closed" to minorities, but the notable thing here is that even black Democtrat politicans are now saying that the GOP is more open to minorities
 
Nov 2011
144
0
You must remember that 100 years ago , the democratic party was pro slavery party and the republican party was the progressive party at the time . it was Abraham Lincoln's party that secured the union and abolished slavery and modernized America .
In the 20th century however; every thing was the opposite . the Democratic party became the progressive party , who gave America FDR who saved America from the grate depression , and JFK who put a man in the moon 10 years after his death . it was the party that ended raciest segregation , while the republican party was trying to hold on to it with teeth and nails .
So ! who knows , maybe the two parties will revers role again .
 
Aug 2011
758
0
You must remember that 100 years ago , the democratic party was pro slavery party and the republican party was the progressive party at the time . it was Abraham Lincoln's party that secured the union and abolished slavery and modernized America .
In the 20th century however; every thing was the opposite . the Democratic party became the progressive party , who gave America FDR who saved America from the grate depression , and JFK who put a man in the moon 10 years after his death . it was the party that ended raciest segregation , while the republican party was trying to hold on to it with teeth and nails .
So ! who knows , maybe the two parties will revers role again .

Can any of you dumb clucks read a history book JUST ONCE?? Even a LIBERAL history book? The civil rights acts of the 1960s were passed with the support of a majority of republican votes. The opposition, including famous fillibusters, was by southern DEMOCRATS .
 
Nov 2011
144
0
Can any of you dumb clucks read a history book JUST ONCE?? Even a LIBERAL history book? The civil rights acts of the 1960s were passed with the support of a majority of republican votes. The opposition, including famous fillibusters, was by southern DEMOCRATS .

I do apologies I was wrong the minority who opposed the bill were suthern democrats more than the republicans .
 
Aug 2011
448
0
California
You must remember that 100 years ago , the democratic party was pro slavery party and the republican party was the progressive party at the time . it was Abraham Lincoln's party that secured the union and abolished slavery and modernized America.......
Correct so far...........

.........In the 20th century however; every thing was the opposite . the Democratic party became the progressive party , who gave America FDR who saved America from the grate depression , and JFK who put a man in the moon 10 years after his death . it was the party that ended raciest segregation , while the republican party was trying to hold on to it with teeth and nails.............
And that is a load of crap.

Congressional Democrats in the 40's and 50's were all KKK members. And Democrat governors, such as George Wallace and others, imposed segregation. Since Abraham Lincoln, Republicans have been there for blacks when it counted. Nevertheless, Democrats invariably take all the credit for the success of the civil rights movement and invariably fail to give any credit to Republicans.


In fact, the civil rights movement was not about politics. Nor was it about which politicians did what and which political party should take the most credit. When it came to civil rights, America's politicians merely saw the handwriting on the wall and wrote the legislation to make into federal law the historical changes that had already taken place. There was nothing else they could do.

The movement of blacks to the North, as well as their contributions as fighting men in the world wars, plus the hard work of millions of blacks and their families and churches, along with the efforts of many private groups and individuals made the civil rights movement succeed. Civil rights for blacks found its historical moment after 1945. Bills introduced in Congress regarding employment policy brought the issue of civil rights to the attention of representatives and senators.

In 1945, 1947 and 1949, the House of Representatives voted to abolish the poll tax restricting the right to vote. Although the Senate did not join in this effort, the bills signaled a growing interest in protecting civil rights through federal action.

The executive branch of government, by presidential order, likewise became active by ending discrimination in the nation's military forces and in federal employment and work done under government contract. Harry Truman ordered the integration of the military. However, his Republican opponent in the election of 1948, Tom Dewey, was just as strong a proponent for that effort as any Democrat. As a matter of fact, the record shows that since 1933 Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats.

In the 26 major civil rights votes after 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 percent of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 percent of the votes.

I suggest you read this: http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/12/13/194350.shtml
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
I'm going to have to agree with Patrick and CC, the Dems didn't become pro-minority until the Southern Strategy pulled their base away from them and the had to reinvent themselves or face extinction (at which point they pulled away the Repub base resulting in the modern political landscape).
 
Nov 2011
144
0
I'm going to have to agree with Patrick and CC, the Dems didn't become pro-minority until the Southern Strategy pulled their base away from them and the had to reinvent themselves or face extinction (at which point they pulled away the Repub base resulting in the modern political landscape).
So do I . I was mistaken and I apologize to every body .
 
Aug 2011
448
0
California
I'm going to have to agree with Patrick and CC, the Dems didn't become pro-minority until the Southern Strategy pulled their base away from them and the had to reinvent themselves or face extinction (at which point they pulled away the Repub base resulting in the modern political landscape).


Well, we agree, except for one thing: I don't think that the liberal welfare state is any friend of minority It has destroyed African American families.


[YOUTUBE]_h5HfLlh-2M&feature=channel_video_title[/YOUTUBE]
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Well, we agree, except for one thing: I don't think that the liberal welfare state is any friend of minority It has destroyed African American families.


[YOUTUBE]_h5HfLlh-2M&feature=channel_video_title[/YOUTUBE]

That's not an exception actually, I'm opposed to the welfare state as well. It's nothing but a meaningless bread and circus ploy to make the honestly downtrodden happy with crumbs and the lazy fat off the taxpayers. Once you get past religion (well Christianity rather, an atheist I'm not) and economics I'm pretty much in agreement with most of the conservative platform. Alas Christianity and economics are major issues in American politics so it's not so obvious until you stumble upon an issue I agree with the right on.
 
Nov 2020
1,571
2
New Amsterdam
COCAINE.jpg



CANADA DRY.jpg
 
Top