Marine Tells Feinstein he will not Disarm.

May 2012
215
37
The motherland
Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban is still a long shot despite the growing public support for gun control because Republicans are controlling the US Congress and the gun lobby such as the NRA has too much political clout and any gun control measures will face a significant hurdle and most school shootings were committed by deranged teens with stolen guns which were legitimately owned by the shooters' relatives.
 
Oct 2012
4,429
1,084
Louisville, Ky
Banning these guns will change very little, It is too late to put the genie back.
 
Jun 2012
740
8
Stuart
In reality the genie was never out. The problem is not the guns but some of the people that get the guns.

Even in the grand scheme of things it is a small portion of the population that is troublesome.
 
Oct 2012
4,429
1,084
Louisville, Ky
In reality the genie was never out. The problem is not the guns but some of the people that get the guns.

Even in the grand scheme of things it is a small portion of the population that is troublesome.

.....Uh...okay, whatever you say.

The Genie in my comment IS the guns.
 
Jan 2013
47
0
I have to applaud this Marine he is correct.

I am oppose to gun control and I agree with this marine's sentiment. But I hope for his sake that he is ready and willing to accept the punishment he will need to face if and when he is breaking the law.
 
Jun 2012
740
8
Stuart
I am oppose to gun control and I agree with this marine's sentiment. But I hope for his sake that he is ready and willing to accept the punishment he will need to face if and when he is breaking the law.

Many of us are going to face the same punishment if this does happen. I am willing to accept the punishment to try and protect my rights.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
If they ever tried to forcefully seize the civilian arsenal, it'd mean civil war. I really hope they're not that stupid.
 
Oct 2012
4,429
1,084
Louisville, Ky
If they ever tried to forcefully seize the civilian arsenal, it'd mean civil war. I really hope they're not that stupid.

Likely it would mean your death, or the loss of the rights you seem to value.

Unless you imagine for some reason, that bunch of crazy gun nuts would defeat the most powerful force the world has sever seen.

Such stupidity is not unimaginable.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Likely it would mean your death, or the loss of the rights you seem to value.

Unless you imagine for some reason, that bunch of crazy gun nuts would defeat the most powerful force the world has sever seen.

Such stupidity is not unimaginable.

The last civil war didn't work out ether. Doesn't change the fact people wouldn't give up their weapons without using them.
 
Jan 2012
1,975
5
Texas
If the made a law to make guns illegal to own it would be impossible to enforce. You would have to confiscate 300 million guns, to do so would be a horrendous undertaking. It would require the vocation of several amendments. And not to mention a huge task force.

If it was voluntary meaning you are just supposed to give up your rights like a good little subject it wouldn't happen. I certainly wouldn't.

If they attempted to forcibly take them, it would spell the end of order in our nation. I would not allow it. And 300 million guns verses the united states military, a devastatingly outnumbered military would stand no chance. I personally don't think the military which is comprised of Americans would go along with such things.

Our right to own weapons gives us the power to rule. This is the only reason that Abby government wants its people unarmed, basically it usurps the people giving power to the government, creating a dictatorship.

It will not happen. Give it up.
 
Jun 2012
740
8
Stuart
If they ever tried to forcefully seize the civilian arsenal, it'd mean civil war. I really hope they're not that stupid.

I personally doubt they are and I am in agreement with Clax. It would be next to impossible to enforce and if it did it would be fought tooth and nail so by the time it took effect it would be years from now.
 
Jan 2012
1,975
5
Texas
I personally doubt they are and I am in agreement with Clax. It would be next to impossible to enforce and if it did it would be fought tooth and nail so by the time it took effect it would be years from now.

You would violate the first amendment, second amendment and forth amendment. To do this would undo our nation.

Either the constitution and bill of rights means something or it is meaningless. There us no in between
 
Dec 2012
518
11
Madison, AL
Thank our most important civil rights organization - the NRA

Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban is still a long shot despite the growing public support for gun control because Republicans are controlling the US Congress and the gun lobby such as the NRA has too much political clout and any gun control measures will face a significant hurdle and most school shootings were committed by deranged teens with stolen guns which were legitimately owned by the shooters' relatives.
Or it might just be the US Constitution...

Why do you want to take actions that had no effect the last time the Democratic radicals in Congress passed a law?
The NRA is our most important Civil Rights organization. You should thank them for protecting your civil rights.
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
Either the constitution and bill of rights means something or it is meaningless. There us no in between

I think we all agree it means something. We just have varying interpretations. And the founding fathers knew of that possibility hence the court system. In fact, even they disagreed on a lot of things, including Constitutionality of certain things.
 
Top