It seems that "a distinction without a difference" between the two exists.
A good analogy is: an atheist is outside the fence, the agnostic is ON the fence, while the theist is IN the pit of hungry lions. As you can see, no difference for practical purposes between outside the fence and on it, but you're only gonna get eaten if in the pit! :redface:
Gnostic literally means (especially to the non-religious) "possessing knowledge", so unless one is born anencephalic, all 7.5 billion on Earth are gnostic to varying degrees, and zero are agnostic.
The only human entities that could be considered agnostic would be the pre-persons/pre-born (zygotes, embryos, and fetuses).
Any thoughts? :unsure:
A good analogy is: an atheist is outside the fence, the agnostic is ON the fence, while the theist is IN the pit of hungry lions. As you can see, no difference for practical purposes between outside the fence and on it, but you're only gonna get eaten if in the pit! :redface:
Gnostic literally means (especially to the non-religious) "possessing knowledge", so unless one is born anencephalic, all 7.5 billion on Earth are gnostic to varying degrees, and zero are agnostic.
The only human entities that could be considered agnostic would be the pre-persons/pre-born (zygotes, embryos, and fetuses).
Any thoughts? :unsure: