9/11

Feb 2010
15
0
Los Angeles
yeah. lolz...I agree. In the video, there were like 86 video cameras that saw the pentagon attack, the FBI confiscated all of the videos....Later they only released 2, both of which didn't show ANY airplane, claiming that it was in between the frames....They proved that it was NOT a huge airplane that hit the pentagon. It was a fighter jet that hit the Pentagon. And then in 3 days, they got the list of the people behind the WTC attacks? In other cases, it took over 2 years....and then 4 people were still alive and came forward and plead their innocence!
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Before this, I never believed in conspiracy theories really...But after watching that zero: investigation in the 9/11 attack, there is SOMETHING going on....I mean, maybe the government didn't do it, but they are DEFINITELY hiding a lot....
They said that there was sulfur in the metal of the WTCs...and they said that there was thermite on the buildings...and theres no way the WTCs could have come down without a structured demolition....which is exactly what it looked like! It was an implosion!! And then in Madrid, a building burned for 20 hours straight without falling down....yet the WTCs fell down within 45 minutes? AND people were able to get out? It obviously wasn't that hot....and then a 150+ ft Boeing 757 went through a 16 foot whole in the pentagon?? AND there was NO trace of the plane. 3 months before 9/11, the protocol for shooting down planes near the pentagon was changed. They had to consult the pentagon before shooting them down and the pentagon "didn't pick up the phone". And then the pictures of Osama Bin Laden. Why are they all different? This whole thing is complete bullshit which makes me question why Bush wasn't assassinated? When Bush was in office, I was 100% sure that somebody would succeed in his assassination...I wish he had been....He ruined America..

The WTC not only was hit by 2 fully fueled planes, but the impact knocked out most of the supports. Most buildings would have collapsed outright. As for the Pentagon, it wasn't even the target, Capital Hill was. As for not shooting them down, NORAD units were deployed but the pilots thought it was a Russian missile attack and went out to sea rather then orbiting the cities.

And OBL pic changes because the man is getting older, changes his look and hasn't been seen in so long, the FBI and CIA have to guess now.
 
Jan 2010
131
0
Alaska
Do you know how many votes more George Bush got? I actually thought Al Gore received more votes, but this is really fascinating. It just comes to show that Americans can make good individual choices - definitely what Bush was.

In FLorida, I remember it being around 300+. I briefly searched for the reporters study but couldn't find it.
 
Feb 2010
15
0
Los Angeles
The WTC not only was hit by 2 fully fueled planes, but the impact knocked out most of the supports. Most buildings would have collapsed outright. As for the Pentagon, it wasn't even the target, Capital Hill was. As for not shooting them down, NORAD units were deployed but the pilots thought it was a Russian missile attack and went out to sea rather then orbiting the cities.

And OBL pic changes because the man is getting older, changes his look and hasn't been seen in so long, the FBI and CIA have to guess now.
That still doesn't explain how a Boeing 757 went through a 16 foot hole and there's no trace of it at all....why wouldn't they shoot down a Russian Missile? Still though, the flames weren't that hot....and why did they find traces of thermite in the buildings? hmm? Watch the videos, the building in Argentina is in MASSIVE flames, and WTCs were barely even in flames....and why did it fall so fast? It fell almost at a freefall....In a freefall it would take like 8 seconds, the WTCs took like 9 or 10 seconds....why? Because it was a controlled demolition. AND people even said that they heard a series of explosions, JUST like a controlled demolition would have..
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
That still doesn't explain how a Boeing 757 went through a 16 foot hole and there's no trace of it at all....why wouldn't they shoot down a Russian Missile? Still though, the flames weren't that hot....and why did they find traces of thermite in the buildings? hmm? Watch the videos, the building in Argentina is in MASSIVE flames, and WTCs were barely even in flames....and why did it fall so fast? It fell almost at a freefall....In a freefall it would take like 8 seconds, the WTCs took like 9 or 10 seconds....why? Because it was a controlled demolition. AND people even said that they heard a series of explosions, JUST like a controlled demolition would have..

1. It blew up and milted.
2. They would, except that there were no Russian missiles.
3. Not that hot?!
3. The thing was burning like a Roman Candle.
4. Free fall is fast. And the "boom"s people were hearing were tons of skyscraper pancaking on itself floor by floor. The resistance caused by these impacts also explains why it fell a bit slower then a typical free fall would.
 
Feb 2010
15
0
Los Angeles
1. It blew up and milted.
2. They would, except that there were no Russian missiles.
3. Not that hot?!
3. The thing was burning like a Roman Candle.
4. Free fall is fast. And the "boom"s people were hearing were tons of skyscraper pancaking on itself floor by floor. The resistance caused by these impacts also explains why it fell a bit slower then a typical free fall would.
That is not "a bit slower" that is barely slower....and that doesn't explain the traces of thermite....and how did a 150ft+ plane get through a 16 ft hole without the wings even touching the Pentagon? And the engines are one of the strongest parts of the plane, and they couldn't even find a trace of it...
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
That is not "a bit slower" that is barely slower....and that doesn't explain the traces of thermite....and how did a 150ft+ plane get through a 16 ft hole without the wings even touching the Pentagon? And the engines are one of the strongest parts of the plane, and they couldn't even find a trace of it...

The wings got sheared off prior to impact (the plan had already crashed before hitting the Pentagon).
 
Feb 2010
15
0
Los Angeles
so how did both wings break off perfectly and they STILL couldn't find any traces of the plane....how do you explain that?
 
Jan 2010
172
26
Miami
I knew if I brought this thread from the grave somebody would come out of the wood work :\

They said that there was sulfur in the metal of the WTCs...and they said that there was thermite on the buildings...and theres no way the WTCs could have come down without a structured demolition....
People who say that buildings don't come down unless they are controlled demolitions do not have any idea how buildings work. The thermite argument has no ground. I'm guess you're also one of those who believes the "meteorites" is a solid hunk of steel.

which is exactly what it looked like! It was an implosion!!
Controlled implosions that I know of don't take with them, every building on the lot. The buildings were hit by jet liners, the impacts removed the fireproofing, some of which was very fragile gypsum wallboard, they completely obliterated the built in active fire suppression systems, and the fuel flash ignited several floors at once, 80 floors above ground. That is by defacto standard the WORST scenario a firefighter can EVER be faced with.

Unprotected steel under high loads will undergo something called creep; it's a plastic deformation of the steel, which if uncontrolled will result in instability, and the loss of strength. What it looks like to you is irrelevant, what happened is.

And then in Madrid, a building burned for 20 hours straight without falling down....yet the WTCs fell down within 45 minutes?
The Windsor tower was a reinforced concrete structure built nothing like the towers. The fact that the architects and engineers for 911 truth can't distinguish that alone tells me how incompetent they are. Also the part of that building which was steel DID collapse in its entirety.

And please, don't bother with bringing up the Empire State Building. That is also a masonry structure, and the steel frame system is also completely different from the towers.

That's brings another point that you're inevitably going to bring up; when you come at me with "this was the first time in history" consider that A) you're suggesting the 1st times never happen; a paradox. And B) most steel structures don't have their built-to-code systems completely compromised by something that cannot be entirely accounted for.

AND people were able to get out? It obviously wasn't that hot
Tell that to the 200 or so people who made the decision to jump rather than burn. Theys had no way out because the planes severed the stairwells and elevators, The one exception was the south tower where the plane missed one of them and it remained passable for a time.

....and then a 150+ ft Boeing 757 went through a 16 foot whole in the pentagon??
The hole was closer to 70 feet. Obviously nobody in this thread is able to explains a strawman set up by loosechange. The purpose of a straw man from the onset is to make up an argument that you can easily tear down. Sorry, Loose Change doesn't dupe everyone with their silly games.

AND there was NO trace of the plane.
None?
Far from it. Everything from the passenger DNA, to the plane parts were identified in full. Perhaps you're unfamiliar with the concept of DNA identification too?

and that doesn't explain the traces of thermite
HINT: The cladding of the trade centers were SURPRISE SURPRISE!! Aluminum. And the structure? STEEL! Which is an alloy mostly comprised of... wait for it... iron!

WTCs were barely even in flames
Does this look like a small fire to you? You do realize each of those floors was 40,000 square feet of office space right?

without the wings even touching the Pentagon
Low mass aluminum wingtips versus an 18 inch thick masonry wall. Which one wins?


In case you haven't noticed, this is 2010, not 2006. I suggest before you rehash Zero, Zeitgeist, Loose Change, September Clues, or whatever, you consult a professional architect or engineer before you bring up that conspiracy material again. And do avoid AE911, they're not credible period, I'm telling YOU from experience discussing stuff with two of their prominent members. Incidentally, one of the two Bjorkman; believes that documented progressive collapses like Ronan Point are impossible.
 
Last edited:
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
I'm not too fond of truthers - no respect for the scientific process.
 

GOP

Feb 2010
360
0
United Kingdom
In FLorida, I remember it being around 300+. I briefly searched for the reporters study but couldn't find it.

The numbers I saw says that Bush received 500 more votes in Florida, actually. I thought it was the other way around, fascinating to see how an election can be so close!
 
Jan 2010
172
26
Miami
The only thing that bothers me is the Pennsylvania crash. That is a bit confusing.

The flight 93 crash isn't the first of its kind unfortunately if that's what's bugging you :\

If it helps any you might look into flight PSA 1771:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Southwest_Airlines_Flight_1771

The way the crash site ended up is a result of the high angle and speed of the impact as I understand it, not unlike the above precedent.

A lot of the arguments I've seen to suggest that crash was faked (as suggested by many of the conspiracy people) involve in part the survival of artifacts from the passengers; and you'll find that this precedent and flight 93 have many parallels.

Again though... I don't know if that's what's bugging you, it's just the most common issue I've seen mentioned
 
Jun 2010
157
0
Several seconds later, the cockpit voice recorder picked up increasing windscreen noise as the airplane pitched down and began to accelerate. A final gunshot was heard and it is speculated that Burke shot himself. The plane then descended and crashed into the hillside of a cattle ranch at 4:16 p.m. in the Santa Lucia Mountains near Paso Robles [5] and Cayucos . The plane was estimated to have crashed nose first at a speed of around 700 miles per hour (1100 km/h, 600 kn), disintegrating instantly. The force of the impact caused such extensive damage that 27 of the passengers were never identified. All aboard, including Burke and Thomson, were killed.
After the crash site was located by a CBS News helicopter piloted by Bob Tur , investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board were joined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation , who after two days over digging through what was left of the site found a handgun containing six spent bullet casings and a note written on the air-sickness bag written by Burke, admitting he was the person responsible for the crash. FBI investigators were also able to lift a print from a fragment of finger stuck in the pistol's trigger guard, which positively identified Burke. In addition to the evidence uncovered at the crash site, other factors surfaced: Burke's co-worker admitted to having lent him the gun, and Burke had also left a farewell message on his girlfriend's telephone answering machine.
Previously, Burke had worked for an airline in Rochester, New York , where he was a suspect in a drug-smuggling ring that was bringing cocaine from Jamaica to Rochester via the airline. He was never officially charged.[6]


Quote from above link. No matter how hard something hits. Theres something left. Thats the line used when they found a passport at Ground Zero right.. works both ways.
 
Jun 2010
157
0
This term… truther. There is no solidarity amongst these folks. I have watched them argue and chide each other. It’s a vast generalization. It frames the argument in ways desired by people looking to discredit as opposed to disprove.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
This term? truther. There is no solidarity amongst these folks. I have watched them argue and chide each other. It?s a vast generalization. It frames the argument in ways desired by people looking to discredit as opposed to disprove.


Thanks for stating the obvious. 'Truther' is nothing more then a derogatory term, I thought everyone already knew this... It wasn't a secret. ;)
 
Top