What measure are you using to come to this conclusion?
Also, what country isn't in some sense ruled by the rich?
I'm using the Economist, an extremely pro-capitalist paper, and just generally-accepted fact everywhere. If you were allowed to know what was going on you'd know this, but you live under an essentially one-party moneymen's dictatorship, as you know, which is why the peasantry are always demanding proof that the world is not flat (usually answered from Wikipedia). As you know, the rich are allowed to buy elections in your country, and the media are not requred to tell the truth at all: that is their 'free speech'.
Most countries are ruled by the rich, but in most they have to hide that fact. You peasants are the only mugs who accept it.