Bin Workers Strike - Edinburgh

Mar 2009
2,188
2
Oh no, it's completely down to the inadequacy of the system. Every other council managed fine. Basically, when the Government makes a law, it provides money to the enforcing agent (in this case the city council), to facilitate its implementation. Councils also get budgets to play around with and enforce their own laws (local government legislation). Since the law requires enforcement, they made up the money they didn't get by hurting the workers. Although I will say that highly authoritarian conditions have nothing to do with costs.
Right. But then we had a really bad recession made worse by really bad financial management of Banks, and all of a sudden there much less money available through taxes too as businesses have gone belly-up. What does one do then?
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Right. But then we had a really bad recession made worse by really bad financial management of Banks, and all of a sudden there much less money available through taxes too as businesses have gone belly-up. What does one do then?

Don't spend money on rescuing them, for a start! ;)
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Completely agreed. The big lie of course was that it would save the country. It only saved the banks and the Government.

Yup. It actually made little economic sense, too. First, it was based on the misconception that the super-rich actually help the economy and it also ignored the entire concept of stationary wealth. If anything, he should have redistributed wealth downward to the people who would spend it, not upward.

And we all know that now it's taken the excuse for extreme state capitalism, the Government will also claim the credit when the economy recovers.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Yup. It actually made little economic sense, too. First, it was based on the misconception that the super-rich actually help the economy and it also ignored the entire concept of stationary wealth. If anything, he should have redistributed wealth downward to the people who would spend it, not upward.
Right. Would have been great if they could have allowed the Banks to fail as they should have, and employed all that cash in creating small bank cooperatives that serve the communities directly.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Yup. It actually made little economic sense, too. First, it was based on the misconception that the super-rich actually help the economy and it also ignored the entire concept of stationary wealth. If anything, he should have redistributed wealth downward to the people who would spend it, not upward.

And we all know that now it's taken the excuse for extreme state capitalism, the Government will also claim the credit when the economy recovers.

And that's why it didn't happen. Never mind that it was redistributed, can't have that evil socialism which isn't even socialism!
 
Top