Chuck baldwin

Jan 2009
140
1
I just started reading up on this guy. The more I read the more I like. Former baptist minister who actually is fair and unbaised in his political stance and he speaks the truth? Maybe he can finally get the christian right to start acting truely conservative instead of neoconic.
 
Jan 2009
639
5
Yep. A real moderate. Just look at his positions.
-He stopped supporting the Republicans because he felt that the Bush-Cheney ticket was too liberal.
-Ran on the ticket for the Alaskan Independence Party (The nuts who want to secede)
-Apparently spoke out against women in the military
-Wants to withdraw from the UN and is against what he views as the new world order. Also seems to be against NATO.
-Against NAFTA
-Against Trans-Texas Corridor (This is a favorite for conspiracy nuts...something about the North American Union)
-Supports 9/11 Truth Movement
-He believes that "the Mexican government is deliberately and systematically working to destabilize and undermine the very fabric and framework of American society."
-He wants to disband the IRS and believes that a 10% tariff would be enough to fund the entire government.
-He wants to return to the gold standard
-He believes "the South was right in the War Between the States" and that participation in the federal government is voluntary.
-He believes that "America was deliberately and distinctively founded as a haven for Christians"
-Wants the 10 commandments displayed on public grounds
-He thinks the FDA is unconstitutional
-He is against mandatory vaccinations (He apparently doesn't understand the concept of herd immunity)
-He wants to disband the Department of Education and encourage homeschooling
-He guarantees to completely end abortion if elected


This is how we define a moderate, right? Something seems a little off.
 
Jan 2009
140
1
Yep. A real moderate. Just look at his positions.
-He stopped supporting the Republicans because he felt that the Bush-Cheney ticket was too liberal.
-Ran on the ticket for the Alaskan Independence Party (The nuts who want to secede)
-Apparently spoke out against women in the military
-Wants to withdraw from the UN and is against what he views as the new world order. Also seems to be against NATO.
-Against NAFTA
-Against Trans-Texas Corridor (This is a favorite for conspiracy nuts...something about the North American Union)
-Supports 9/11 Truth Movement
-He believes that "the Mexican government is deliberately and systematically working to destabilize and undermine the very fabric and framework of American society."
-He wants to disband the IRS and believes that a 10% tariff would be enough to fund the entire government.
-He wants to return to the gold standard
-He believes "the South was right in the War Between the States" and that participation in the federal government is voluntary.
-He believes that "America was deliberately and distinctively founded as a haven for Christians"
-Wants the 10 commandments displayed on public grounds
-He thinks the FDA is unconstitutional
-He is against mandatory vaccinations (He apparently doesn't understand the concept of herd immunity)
-He wants to disband the Department of Education and encourage homeschooling
-He guarantees to completely end abortion if elected


This is how we define a moderate, right? Something seems a little off.

I guess we have a different defintion of liberal. You define moderate as a war president who goes to wars over lies and deregulates wallstreet. Call me crazy but i like a candidate thats supports the constitution.
I guess u would call bush a moderate but to me hes a bigtime liberal because going to war all gungho and crazy over a lie at the snap of a finger isnt conservative or moderate. Its purely liberal. True conservatism and what the republican party originally stood for was no entangling alliances, no nation building, fiscal conservitism. Now i didnt know about the ten commandments thing as i dont agree with that even though im christian.

Im just wondering why you would think the 9-11 truth movement to be nutty? Do you just believe everything ur government spoon feeds to you or do you have a mind of your own to actually have an opinion of your own?
 
Last edited:
Jan 2009
639
5
I actually wouldn't call Bush a moderate. He was a conservative and possibly a member of the religious right. His interviews near the end seemed to suggest that he wasn't as diehard about religion though, so I'm not sure. He might be closer to a fiscal conservative in a way. (This is why I hate labels...nobody fits one perfectly). I'm not sure how it would be liberal to start a war (any war) because liberals usually encompass the ideals of populism and humanism.

This actually does raise a good point though. The terms are getting switched about again. This seems to happen about once every 50 years (Democrats of today are nothing like the original Democrats, for example). Liberal hasn't changed as much (bigger government, socialist leanings, etc). Conservative is starting to mean more of traditional mindset though with positions close to the Reagan government. Their positions on war usually change based on the war though, so I don't think you could ever just form a list.

That actually is a good point about the Republican party. They are leaning away from the good founding of the party and seem to have let the religious right get a hold them. A number of their policies have started to shift to their own form of nanny state. Not good on either side.

Baldwin isn't a moderate though. Moderate would mean straight down the middle. He probably focus on pragmatism and limit dogma associated to his positions.

Baldwin is a libertarian. Nothing wrong with that. It's a political position just as valid as any other. It just means that he is not a moderate.

As far as 9/11, there is a separate thread devoted to that and I'm trying to not derail any more threads here. I'll see you over there in a second.
 
Jan 2009
118
2
Their religious coat is just for votes, and a majority of the stuff passed doesn't really negatively effect them economical so they'll take that stance even if it screws over a group of people who's minding their own business (ie. homosexuals, non-extremists etc.).

As for the FDA, while I don't necessarily agree with his views on it, we definitely need to make sure that there is more honesty coming from them as I've read numerous accounts of them passing dangerous stuff as clean and it's not until people die that they decide to pull them out. Whether it's due to dishonesty (bribes etc.) or legitimate mistakes (they might have even been fooled), it's still serious.
 
Jan 2009
639
5
Well the biggest problem with the FDA is that a lot of these things don't have effects until months or even years after they are taken. They generally do the best that they can to spot the bad stuff.

A much bigger problem is our lack of oversight in the beef industry (if fast food nation is to be believed).
 
Jan 2013
316
4
Delaware
I actually wouldn't call Bush a moderate. He was a conservative and possibly a member of the religious right. His interviews near the end seemed to suggest that he wasn't as diehard about religion though, so I'm not sure. He might be closer to a fiscal conservative in a way. (This is why I hate labels...nobody fits one perfectly). I'm not sure how it would be liberal to start a war (any war) because liberals usually encompass the ideals of populism and humanism.

This actually does raise a good point though. The terms are getting switched about again. This seems to happen about once every 50 years (Democrats of today are nothing like the original Democrats, for example). Liberal hasn't changed as much (bigger government, socialist leanings, etc). Conservative is starting to mean more of traditional mindset though with positions close to the Reagan government. Their positions on war usually change based on the war though, so I don't think you could ever just form a list.

That actually is a good point about the Republican party. They are leaning away from the good founding of the party and seem to have let the religious right get a hold them. A number of their policies have started to shift to their own form of nanny state. Not good on either side.

Baldwin isn't a moderate though. Moderate would mean straight down the middle. He probably focus on pragmatism and limit dogma associated to his positions.

Baldwin is a libertarian. Nothing wrong with that. It's a political position just as valid as any other. It just means that he is not a moderate.

As far as 9/11, there is a separate thread devoted to that and I'm trying to not derail any more threads here. I'll see you over there in a second.

Well, I personally think Bush was more liberal. While he was indeed in bed with the religious right, he expanded government more than Clinton ever did. Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind were huge things, especially for a conservative.


I agree with the terms beign switched around but I think (and hope) the right wing will move away from Jerry Falwell dominated mindsets and go back to traditional conservatism.
 
Nov 2020
1,571
2
New Amsterdam
Given the existence as uttered forth in the public works of Puncher and Wattmann of a personal God quaquaquaqua with white beard quaquaquaqua outside time without extension who from the heights of divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown but time will tell and suffers like the divine Miranda with those who for reasons unknown but time will tell are plunged in torment plunged in fire whose fire flames if that continues and who can doubt it will fire the firmament that is to say blast heaven to hell so blue still and calm so calm with a calm which even though intermittent is better than nothing but not so fast and considering what is more that as a result of the labours left unfinished crowned by the Acacacacademy of Anthropopopometry of Essy-in-Possy of Testew and Cunard it is established beyond all doubt all other doubt than that which clings to the labours of men that as a result of the labours unfinished of Testew and Cunard it is established as hereinafter but not so fast for reasons unknown that as a result of the public works of Puncher and Wattmann it is established beyond all doubt that in view of the labours of Fartov and Belcher left unfinished for reasons unknown of Testew and Cunard left unfinished it is established what many deny that man in Possy of Testew and Cunard that man in Essy that man in short that man in brief in spite of the strides of alimentation and defecation is seen to waste and pine waste and pine and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the strides of physical culture the practice of sports such as tennis football running cycling swimming flying floating riding gliding conating camogie skating tennis of all kinds dying flying sports of all sorts autumn summer winter winter tennis of all kinds hockey of all sorts penicilline and succedanea in a word I resume and concurrently simultaneously for reasons unknown to shrink and dwindle in spite of the tennis I resume flying gliding golf over nine and eighteen holes tennis of all sorts in a word for reasons unknown in Feckham Peckham Fulham Clapham namely concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown but time will tell to shrink and dwindle I resume Fulham Clapham in a word the dead loss per head since the death of Bishop Berkeley being to the tune of one inch four ounce per head approximately by and large more or less to the nearest decimal good measure round figures stark naked in the stockinged feet in Connemara in a word for reasons unknown no matter what matter the facts are there and considering what is more much more grave that in the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman it appears what is more much more grave that in the light the light the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman that in the plains in the mountains by the seas by the rivers running water running fire the air is the same and than the earth namely the air and then the earth in the great cold the great dark the air and the earth abode of stones in the great cold alas alas in the year of their Lord six hundred and something the air the earth the sea the earth abode of stones in the great deeps the great cold on sea on land and in the air I resume for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis the facts are there but time will tell I resume alas alas on on in short in fine on on abode of stones who can doubt it I resume but not so fast I resume the skull to shrink and waste and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis on on the beard the flames the tears the stones so blue so calm alas alas on on the skull the skull the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the labours abandoned left unfinished graver still abode of stones in a word I resume alas alas abandoned unfinished the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the skull alas the stones Cunard (mêlée, final vociferations) tennis… the stones… so calm… Cunard… unfinished…” vGiven the existence as uttered forth in the public works of Puncher and Wattmann of a personal God quaquaquaqua with white beard quaquaquaqua outside time without extension who from the heights of divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown but time will tell and suffers like the divine Miranda with those who for reasons unknown but time will tell are plunged in torment plunged in fire whose fire flames if that continues and who can doubt it will fire the firmament that is to say blast heaven to hell so blue still and calm so calm with a calm which even though intermittent is better than nothing but not so fast and considering what is more that as a result of the labours left unfinished crowned by the Acacacacademy of Anthropopopometry of Essy-in-Possy of Testew and Cunard it is established beyond all doubt all other doubt than that which clings to the labours of men that as a result of the labours unfinished of Testew and Cunard it is established as hereinafter but not so fast for reasons unknown that as a result of the public works of Puncher and Wattmann it is established beyond all doubt that in view of the labours of Fartov and Belcher left unfinished for reasons unknown of Testew and Cunard left unfinished it is established what many deny that man in Possy of Testew and Cunard that man in Essy that man in short that man in brief in spite of the strides of alimentation and defecation is seen to waste and pine waste and pine and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the strides of physical culture the practice of sports such as tennis football running cycling swimming flying floating riding gliding conating camogie skating tennis of all kinds dying flying sports of all sorts autumn summer winter winter tennis of all kinds hockey of all sorts penicilline and succedanea in a word I resume and concurrently simultaneously for reasons unknown to shrink and dwindle in spite of the tennis I resume flying gliding golf over nine and eighteen holes tennis of all sorts in a word for reasons unknown in Feckham Peckham Fulham Clapham namely concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown but time will tell to shrink and dwindle I resume Fulham Clapham in a word the dead loss per head since the death of Bishop Berkeley being to the tune of one inch four ounce per head approximately by and large more or less to the nearest decimal good measure round figures stark naked in the stockinged feet in Connemara in a word for reasons unknown no matter what matter the facts are there and considering what is more much more grave that in the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman it appears what is more much more grave that in the light the light the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman that in the plains in the mountains by the seas by the rivers running water running fire the air is the same and than the earth namely the air and then the earth in the great cold the great dark the air and the earth abode of stones in the great cold alas alas in the year of their Lord six hundred and something the air the earth the sea the earth abode of stones in the great deeps the great cold on sea on land and in the air I resume for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis the facts are there but time will tell I resume alas alas on on in short in fine on on abode of stones who can doubt it I resume but not so fast I resume the skull to shrink and waste and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis on on the beard the flames the tears the stones so blue so calm alas alas on on the skull the skull the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the labours abandoned left unfinished graver still abode of stones in a word I resume alas alas abandoned unfinished the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the skull alas the stones Cunard (mêlée, final vociferations) tennis… the stones… so calm… Cunard… unfinished…”
 
Top