David Jul 2009 5,893 474 Port St. Lucie Mar 25, 2011 #21 obtuseobserver said: I'm saying most won't agree Click to expand... Just because they disagree doesn't mean they're right.
obtuseobserver said: I'm saying most won't agree Click to expand... Just because they disagree doesn't mean they're right.
obtuseobserver Aug 2010 862 0 Mar 25, 2011 #22 kowalskil said: Actually, radioactive atoms contribute very little to the total mass of spent fuel. But I know what you mean, and I agree that reprocessing, of one kind or another, is desirable. Ludwik . Click to expand... But the total mass is important as well. It is easier to store 1kg of waste than 100kg of waste.
kowalskil said: Actually, radioactive atoms contribute very little to the total mass of spent fuel. But I know what you mean, and I agree that reprocessing, of one kind or another, is desirable. Ludwik . Click to expand... But the total mass is important as well. It is easier to store 1kg of waste than 100kg of waste.
obtuseobserver Aug 2010 862 0 Mar 25, 2011 #23 David said: Just because they disagree doesn't mean they're right. Click to expand... well no shit but back here on planet earth that's how it is happening and will continue to happen
David said: Just because they disagree doesn't mean they're right. Click to expand... well no shit but back here on planet earth that's how it is happening and will continue to happen
David Jul 2009 5,893 474 Port St. Lucie Mar 25, 2011 #24 obtuseobserver said: well no shit but back here on planet earth that's how it is happening and will continue to happen Click to expand... Oh, I know. I'm just making the point that we, as a society, need a reality check.
obtuseobserver said: well no shit but back here on planet earth that's how it is happening and will continue to happen Click to expand... Oh, I know. I'm just making the point that we, as a society, need a reality check.