Gay marriage, civil unions and the sanctity of marriage

Yeah, we briefly mentioned this on a thread on the society section. It probably does need a separate thread, though.

I think definitely that people should have the freedom to love whom they like. And, if they like, there's little reason that gender should have anything to do with limiting the rights of individuals. And so, if mixed couples have the right to marry, which they're perfectly welcome to, same-sex couples should also have that right.

The religious rules regarding this idea are a reflection of the moral values of millenia ago and are outdated and invalid in modern society, which should value freedom and equality.

As i'm opposed to limiting everyone's freedom by banning marriage altogether, i'd think the best way to achieve equality is to allow marriage for same-sex couples.

omeythehomie said:

Are the above mentioned issues really something that states should be deciding individually? Or are they a matter of rights that should be addressed by the government?


IMO, it's an issue of rights and needs a governmental rule. Marriage can't be accepted in one state and not in another. Furthermore, there's hardly any "sanctity" left in marriage. Divorce rates, cheating - marriage has enough problems as it currently stands. Gay marriage can't possibly make the word worse.

Click to expand...

Yeah give them the right! Let them pay the price like the rest of us do.

And if they don't like it, tell them to shut-up they asked for it.

omeythehomie said:

AFurthermore, there's hardly any "sanctity" left in marriage. Divorce rates, cheating - marriage has enough problems as it currently stands. Gay marriage can't possibly make the word worse.

Click to expand...

Honestly, I have known some couples who are not married but living their life fully like a married couple while some married couple I saw always tend to get annulled several months after marriage.

The only problem is that the early government left us with a problem. I'll admit that I'm paraphrasing an argument from Colbert a few weeks back, but it pretty much summed up my thoughts.

Marriage is a religious function. The state unfortunately chose to make it a state recognized function too though. So here we are. The church has a strong opinion on it and they managed to rally enough conservative behinds it (with a ridiculous budget and a lot of lies).

If things continue as they are, we'll probably just have to stop recognizing marriage and just recognize civil unions officially. Marriage could then just be a religious function. It's going to have to be marriage for all or civil unions for all. We'll see which way it goes in the future.

The tax authorities probably also factor in in a significant way, wanting to make sure that the tax payer is neatly identified for taxation purposes. Looks as though all Governments like to put people in identifiable pigeon holes.

Yeah. There's got to be a good way to recognize and organize family groups. Marriage worked really well for awhile, but times are changing.

The Parakeet said:

Yeah. There's got to be a good way to recognize and organize family groups. Marriage worked really well for awhile, but times are changing.

Click to expand...

I do agree with you. Remember the actor/actress couple who get married and after less than 3 days, they filed a divorce.
Honestly, I can't remember the names of them.

GekiDan said:

I do agree with you. Remember the actor/actress couple who get married and after less than 3 days, they filed a divorce.
Honestly, I can't remember the names of them.

Click to expand...

Has to be difficult to do since life has become complicated and relationships don't last that long. Wonder how anyone can identify who goes with whom any longer for tax purposes for example. Confusing.

“Given the existence as uttered forth in the public works of Puncher and Wattmann of a personal God quaquaquaqua with white beard quaquaquaqua outside time without extension who from the heights of divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown but time will tell and suffers like the divine Miranda with those who for reasons unknown but time will tell are plunged in torment plunged in fire whose fire flames if that continues and who can doubt it will fire the firmament that is to say blast heaven to hell so blue still and calm so calm with a calm which even though intermittent is better than nothing but not so fast and considering what is more that as a result of the labours left unfinished crowned by the Acacacacademy of Anthropopopometry of Essy-in-Possy of Testew and Cunard it is established beyond all doubt all other doubt than that which clings to the labours of men that as a result of the labours unfinished of Testew and Cunard it is established as hereinafter but not so fast for reasons unknown that as a result of the public works of Puncher and Wattmann it is established beyond all doubt that in view of the labours of Fartov and Belcher left unfinished for reasons unknown of Testew and Cunard left unfinished it is established what many deny that man in Possy of Testew and Cunard that man in Essy that man in short that man in brief in spite of the strides of alimentation and defecation is seen to waste and pine waste and pine and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the strides of physical culture the practice of sports such as tennis football running cycling swimming flying floating riding gliding conating camogie skating tennis of all kinds dying flying sports of all sorts autumn summer winter winter tennis of all kinds hockey of all sorts penicilline and succedanea in a word I resume and concurrently simultaneously for reasons unknown to shrink and dwindle in spite of the tennis I resume flying gliding golf over nine and eighteen holes tennis of all sorts in a word for reasons unknown in Feckham Peckham Fulham Clapham namely concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown but time will tell to shrink and dwindle I resume Fulham Clapham in a word the dead loss per head since the death of Bishop Berkeley being to the tune of one inch four ounce per head approximately by and large more or less to the nearest decimal good measure round figures stark naked in the stockinged feet in Connemara in a word for reasons unknown no matter what matter the facts are there and considering what is more much more grave that in the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman it appears what is more much more grave that in the light the light the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman that in the plains in the mountains by the seas by the rivers running water running fire the air is the same and than the earth namely the air and then the earth in the great cold the great dark the air and the earth abode of stones in the great cold alas alas in the year of their Lord six hundred and something the air the earth the sea the earth abode of stones in the great deeps the great cold on sea on land and in the air I resume for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis the facts are there but time will tell I resume alas alas on on in short in fine on on abode of stones who can doubt it I resume but not so fast I resume the skull to shrink and waste and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis on on the beard the flames the tears the stones so blue so calm alas alas on on the skull the skull the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the labours abandoned left unfinished graver still abode of stones in a word I resume alas alas abandoned unfinished the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the skull alas the stones Cunard (mêlée, final vociferations) tennis… the stones… so calm… Cunard… unfinished…”