What we observed, happened, but it did NOT happen as a result of a gravity induced "collapse" it had help from something be that something explosives or black magic & witchcraft .... the events of 9/11/2001 were NOT as reported in the "NEWS" .....
Indisputable Facts 9/11: Quite disturbing information
- Thread starter x0Maximilian0x
- Start date
- Status
What we observed, happened, but it did NOT happen as a result of a gravity induced "collapse" it had help from something be that something explosives or black magic & witchcraft .... the events of 9/11/2001 were NOT as reported in the "NEWS" .....
You've demonstrated quite clearly that you're not qualified to make declarations of fact on topics you show no interest in learning about. You decided to jump on the topic, so you're expected to backup your claims if you have any interest in being taken seriously.
This is precisely why OP's like the one in this thread are blisteringly ironic for chastising dissent as "psychological protection" when some of the very supporters of those theories, like yourself think they can push their ideology on others without having to back their claims up. You can have your opinion but you won't be stating those as fact any time soon.
Last edited:
Have you read #71 in this discussion?
Please note that the video that I was directed to view,
was a guy that thinks dropping a 25 lb weight on a bathroom
scale and seeing the scale broken alleges that this is prof that
the "dynamic forces" involved in destroying the WTC towers
had to have worked as observed without help from explosives.
HOWEVER, in order to deliver the energy ( that is to break the scale )
the weight had to STOP ..... CAN U DIG IT?
Please note that the video that I was directed to view,
was a guy that thinks dropping a 25 lb weight on a bathroom
scale and seeing the scale broken alleges that this is prof that
the "dynamic forces" involved in destroying the WTC towers
had to have worked as observed without help from explosives.
HOWEVER, in order to deliver the energy ( that is to break the scale )
the weight had to STOP ..... CAN U DIG IT?
Last edited:
So, the Kinetic energy of the falling mass of the top 17 stories, was so great as to totally overwhelm the structure below it and the energy required to pulverize mass quantities of material & break-up the structure below the 93rd floor, only took 36% or less of said Kinetic energy.
Reminds me of an old routine
where two comics on stage, one is wearing an
amulet and the other asks what its for, and
the answer is: it keeps great white bear out of NYC
and the first comic sez "there are NO bears in NYC"
and the guy with the amulet sez "see .... Magic good!"
AE911TRUTH PLAYSCHOOL WITH RICHARD GAGE. - YouTube
What are your thoughts on this? Just curious... and can you elaborate on your answer?
Maybe you can shed some "light" on the conspiracy I don't "see"
First of all, minds are like parachutes .... ( can U dig it? )
in the case of ANYTHING that is completely destroyed, the police have a mandate to INVESTIGATE, because the complete & total destruction of anything is considered suspicious.
statements like "total collapse was inevitable..... " from the NIST
constitutes FRAUD! nobody can say that any such event was inevitable.
The alleged plane crashes & fires can NOT be considered sufficient damage to assume the total destruction of both towers would be a consequence.
There are a number of possible scenarios to consider, in the case of the north tower, having the top 17 stories collapse down onto the remainder of the tower ( without loosing any significant bits over the side .. that alone is quite a good trick ) and the rubble thus generated could have simply penetrated the deck(s) below and redistributed material until equilibrium was reached. WHY the total catastrophic failure mode?
Have you seen the experiment conducted where a concrete block is dropped from 5 stories up? if you haven't what do you think happens, does the block pulverize itself? or does it simply break?
9/11/2001 = LIE
WE THE PEOPLE need to demand answers from our "leaders"
Lets Roll!
Jeez you're like 7forever that continuously spams the dead horse of the JFK conspiracies in a lone wolf campaign.... I don't know what else to tell you... you don't know what your talking about but you're so certain you do you're oblivious. I'm afraid I can't help you.
Last edited:
Because I've rebutted you:
here
here
here
here
and
here
So, as you can see, I've dignified and answered all of your questions with thoughtful responses, and you're busy repeating the same crapola you've been saying since page #3 of this thread, I see no reason to repeat myself.
Note, I asked you in many of those posts to explain what makes your suspicion valid, and to explain how you think I was wrong; but instead you glaze over them and tell me "SOMETHING'S NOT RITE WTFBBQ!!!" over and over again. Sir... you're demanding of me, something I've already done, and that you're incapable of doing yourself.
If you want me to waste my precious free time sparring with you on this more, do something other than assert and ignore. Until then I will not gratify you with time wasting.
Last edited:
Do tell, what would cause the walls to consistently fold inward in light of the fact that there was continuous ejections of pulverized material from the tower(s)?
Also, Please enlighten me here, what happened to the HAT TRUSSES?
enquirming minds & all that rot!
Answered in post 59: http://politicalfray.com/conspiracy...quite-disturbing-information-3.html#post45640
2nd quote response.
problem?
Please, if you have any recorded video, or know somebody who recorded the "NEWS" of 9/11/2001 - do review the material ... see & hear ...
Good stuff .... no?
If you review the witness statements nearly all reports refer to simile and metaphor, the plane crashes themselves, or otherwise. But the physical evidence shows conclusively that none of the reports were a result of loud cutter charges being detonated, period. Unless you have better evidence to suffice, which you don't
- Status
Similar threads
