IT DOESN'T MATTER Whose Voice It Was!

Road Warrior · Jun 23, 2013

Protectionist said:
Sure. But neither of us can really know what the outcome will be, which could be determined by prejudicial feeling of the jurors, bad judging, and things yet to be seen, rather than just pure right and wrong.

Of course not. If we did then what would be the purpose of the bet? It'd be like betting whether or not it would rain or that birds have to land.

As it is, I have faith in the judicial system. If there is anything off about the Zimmerman case then he'll go free. Not that he's innocent, just that he's not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

FWIW, he pursued and ended up shooting an unarmed kid because he thought that kid "looks like he's up to no good".

http://bizsecurity.about.com/od/cre...cript-Of-The-George-Zimmerman-Police-Call.htm
This guy looks like he's up to no good, or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about.

Protectionist · Jun 24, 2013

Road Warrior said:
FWIW, he pursued and ended up shooting an unarmed kid because he thought that kid "looks like he's up to no good".

FWIW ? Well, it's worth absolutely NOTHING, because it's the dumbest post I've ever seen.

1. He is SUPPOSED to pursue. That is correct security procedure.

2. "Unarmed" is irrelevant. What do you think this is > an 1872 gunfight in Dodge City ?

3. "Kid" is irrelevant. Trayvon was 6'3" inches tall and capable of delivering some viable punches.

4. The shooting was because there was a physical attack > Trayvon against Zimmerman, not the nonsense you said.

PS - He sure was "up to no good". Turns out the "no good" was attempted murder, and he got what he asked for.

Road Warrior · Jun 25, 2013

Protectionist said:
FWIW ? Well, it's worth absolutely NOTHING, because it's the dumbest post I've ever seen.

That's actually a pretty common accusation when someone is out of intellectual ammunition.

Protectionist · Jun 26, 2013

Road Warrior said:
That's actually a pretty common accusation when someone is out of intellectual ammunition.

Not much intellectual ammunition needed to refute what you've said. Just a few facts is sufficient (like #s 1-4 in Post # 22)

IT DOESN'T MATTER Whose Voice It Was!

Road Warrior

Protectionist

Road Warrior

Protectionist

Similar threads