Omniscience and Morality

TortoiseDream said:

My point is that placing God above reason effectively takes away any possible null-hypothesis from the discussion. If God is simply above human reason, then no rational thought can discredit God, i.e. there is no criteria for disproof.

Click to expand...

And if he isn't then you have limited God to human reason and understanding... which is to say something not God.

The problem is trying to logically account for either the existence or non-existence of God. It cannot be done. This is why the faithful rely on faith not proof and why the empiracist is baffled by the debate.

One cannot know until one does... and then it is too late.

People have free will, nothing is predetemined, those things are stated in the bible the idea that God knows what will happen is very different than him controlling what will happen.

Just like if you take a glass of water and turn it over, you know the water will come out right. Will it do the same of somebody else dose it? And if that is the case dose knowing that outcome garantee every glass of water will be spilled.

There is a differance in knowing and making something happen. If God knows my out come, fine. But I don't, so why sit and ponder something that is of little cercumstance to me.

In that same breath all people know they will die, so why bother living? The outcome is alrady determined so what's the point in existing? Is it in hopes that you will be the first person to live forever? For thatmatter why have kids knowing they will die.

That form of thinking is anti human, I can't wrap my head around that concept.