That is unfortunate, but I wasn't too surprised that the Orca would fight back eventually.
Fight back?
That is unfortunate, but I wasn't too surprised that the Orca would fight back eventually.
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-new...drowns-trainer-in-seaworld-20100225-p5we.html
The evidence clearly indicates that the whale attacked the human abuse-director or "trainer". The movement of the orca was one of precision and purpose.
Witnesses said that the orca was not obeying instruction as usual, was in a clearly agitated state swam at high speed and jumped out of the water and grabbed the woman, and dragged her around in the water. The orca was also said to have "shaken" her.
Humans set up such parks and zoos to gawk at caged, abused animals so they can delude themselves that they are a Superior species, when in fact humans are a deranged, faulty species.
To any sane thinker, the orca's were being seriously abused and exploited and were clearly agitated and tired of the ill-treatment.
Then you should be against the whole animal-"trainer" construct at sea world.
Maybe I should and maybe I shouldn't, but you have no idea what I am or am not for or against.
Quote:
CS : For the same reason we do not permit uranium and pathogens to run loose around people who consent. The Romans used to permit "consenting" human beings kill each other for public amusement, but modern law does not.............................And in any event how would you like to be a 6,000 pound killer whale alone in a fish bowl for life?
I can say that I do not wish to be as destructive in my outlook as your posts.
I do have an idea, because I have read your posts. Why not just tell us your stance?
I've got a pretty cynical view on these things, if you're going to play with fire eventually someone is going to get burnt.
My god this is a killer freaking whale, a 8.8 ton beast that belongs in huge massive bodies of water called the ocean, not some little holding cell to be gawked, prodded, and fish thrown at when he does something cool.
Yeah it's great to be able to go see these creatures we'd normally never be able to see, but why do people act surprised when their animal instincts kick in and they start whipping ass?
Some of the animals are treated well, but I think it is quite inhumane to keep animals or birds in cages. Also, people have this strange knack of mirroring their own emotions on animals, deluding themselves that they know how to deal with them and that they love humans. One should probably always respect that they are non-human.Humans set up such parks and zoos to gawk at caged, abused animals so they can delude themselves that they are a Superior species, when in fact humans are a deranged, faulty species.
Some of the animals are treated well,
The whales at seaworld are not only victims of human society (although not to the extent humans are) due to their inability to live in nature, but also by confinement, being made to perform unnatural 'tricks' and so on.but I think it is quite inhumane to keep animals or birds in cages.
Correct. Humans delude themselves that animals love them, because they are sick and desperately need to feel loved, even though that love is false. It is almost certain that animals (especially wild or natural animals) know that humans are inferior and disturbed and simply manipulate the humans they are forced and conditioned to interact with.Also, people have this strange knack of mirroring their own emotions on animals, deluding themselves that they know how to deal with them and that they love humans.
Not probably, should. They are Superior to human.One should probably always respect that they are non-human.
You are correct, with regard to seaworld and zoos. Apologies. I had in mind the "farms" that have been put specially together for species on the verge of becoming extinct, such as elephant farms in the United States, and farms in Southern Africa for preserving leopards, rhinos etc. Natural habitat, without being really natural. There are still boundaries attached.You are incorrect. All captive animals at seaworld and zoos are badly treated, even just because they are being imprisoned within the physical grounds of toxic human societies.
Right, it is double jeopardy.The whales at seaworld are not only victims of human society (although not to the extent humans are) due to their inability to live in nature, but also by confinement, being made to perform unnatural 'tricks' and so on.
I agree with the first sentence, and I agree partially with the second. Animals do have good instincts, but I doubt they have enough thinking abilities to manipulate humans. It would be more a case of instincts for survival.Correct. Humans delude themselves that animals love them, because they are sick and desperately need to feel loved, even though that love is false. It is almost certain that animals (especially wild or natural animals) know that humans are inferior and disturbed and simply manipulate the humans they are forced and conditioned to interact with.
That could well be. They probably know more about us than we do about them. I sometimes wonder whether our "intelligence" is our greatest stumbling block. If we could get that out of the way, we may communicate with animals in a completely different, and perhaps much more honest way.Not probably, should. They are Superior to human.
I agree with the first sentence, and I agree partially with the second. Animals do have good instincts, but I doubt they have enough thinking abilities to manipulate humans. It would be more a case of instincts for survival.
OK ... I'm now changing my mind. You're right. :redface:Cats... I need not say more.
I agree with the first sentence, and I agree partially with the second. Animals do have good instincts, but I doubt they have enough thinking abilities to manipulate humans. It would be more a case of instincts for survival.
Intelligence is our greatest stumbling block, in that it has lead to an inability to recognize and embrace Truth. Theoretically, humans could have developed higher cognitive function without the genocidal drawbacks, but that is not what happened.I sometimes wonder whether our "intelligence" is our greatest stumbling block. If we could get that out of the way, we may communicate with animals in a completely different, and perhaps much more honest way.
Cats... I need not say more.
Mental disorder for me is in the eye of the beholder, and definitely relative. Most of us may be suffering from it without being aware of it.However, humans are also hopelessly diseased in the mind, and suffer from derangements and mental disorders on a grand scale. The cognitive complexity in humans has lead to failure, unreliability and inability to handle Truth.
Probably because they cannot face themselves. Instead they seem to be chasing after a myth that has been created by society.Intelligence is our greatest stumbling block, in that it has lead to an inability to recognize and embrace Truth. Theoretically, humans could have developed higher cognitive function without the genocidal drawbacks, but that is not what happened.
Right, like standing on their hind feet and begging for food. Then it is given to them. Ditto in the circus. Think I get it.And dogs. Domestic dogs almost always learn how to manipulate their deranged and inferior human "owners".