Paul Krugman Files Force Divorce: From Reality.

Aug 2010
862
0
I was just reasding a blog piece about an editorial written by Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman as well as a response to Mr. Krugman by Charles Blahous .

Krugman's Op-Ed is titled Hey Big Spender . Blahous's response it titled Is Everyone Just Imagining The Government Spending Explosion ?

Here's a brief excerpt from Mr. Krugman's editorial.

If the comments don't strike you as
Here?s the narrative you hear everywhere: President Obama has presided over a huge expansion of government, but unemployment has remained high. And this proves that government spending can?t create jobs.

Here?s what you need to know: The whole story is a myth. There never was a big expansion of government spending. In fact, that has been the key problem with economic policy in the Obama years: we never had the kind of fiscal expansion that might have created the millions of jobs we need.

Ask yourself: What major new federal programs have started up since Mr. Obama took office? Health care reform, for the most part, hasn?t kicked in yet, so that can?t be it. So are there giant infrastructure projects under way? Are there huge new benefits for low-income workers or the poor? No. Where?s all that spending we keep hearing about? It never happened.
 
Jul 2010
8
0
Moore, OK
No new jobs this recession because:

1 ) Today's technology makes running a small business possible with very few employees - so the biggest jobs creators of the last recessions will not be hiring as many people.

2) Big companies don't need as many people to do a job, due to similar technology - so they are not needing to hire.

You can stimulate all you want, it is just prolonging the reality that new technologies have finally caught up with the promises of efficiency and productivity that the new technology companies have been promising for the last decade.

Welcome to the brave new world.
 
Last edited:
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
No new jobs this recession because:

1 ) Today's technology makes running a small business possible with very few employees - so the biggest jobs creators of the last recessions will not be hiring as many people.

2) Big companies don't need as many people to do a job, due to similar technology - so they are not needing to hire.

You can stimulate all you want, it is just prolonging the reality that new technologies have finally caught up with the promises of efficiency and productivity that the new technology companies have been promising for the last decade.

Welcome to the brave new world.

True, the labor based economy in the industrialized world is largely obsolete (we don't even need to drive anymore). The problem is people get caught up in the whole wage slavery issue and fight tech advancements. If we want the labor world to synchronize with the tech world we need to massively retrain and actively shift people's view of work from 'laborer' to 'producer'. Once we do this (if we do this) we could easily have a scientist based economy with menial labor, communications, transportation, etc. handled by automated systems.

We think stuff up, the robots do the actual work.
 
Aug 2010
862
0
We doin't need to drive? Are you serious? Do you own a car? If so, flush your keys and refuse to ride in a car for a month. Get back to us if you still have a job and enough $ to pay your electricity and internet service bills. People need cars to get from one place to another.

If you live in Boston to DC you can live without a car. But you're dependent on the trains. Highly subsidized transportation. I have zero interest in paying for you to get from A to B.

On what basis do you assert we have no need for cars? This has got to be a fascinating response.

Labor is anything but obsolete; the cheaper cost of basic unskilled labor in other countries is why much manufacturing is done over seas. Our manufacturing sector - much maligned - is actually HUGE in scale and in terms of advanced technology is far and away the most high tech in the world.
 
Top