Mostly true, those who belong to actual tribe can be Jews without belonging to the religion.
What exactly is a Jewish Person?
- Thread starter falcondule
- Start date
Mostly true, those who belong to actual tribe can be Jews without belonging to the religion.
The tribe is long gone. I know people refer to some Polish people as Jews because they have Polish last names. To me this isn't Jewish unless they follow the religion. But again that is my opinion.
Exactly....it is opinion, as is every aspect of religious thought.
If you say you are Jewish...you are.
Exactly....it is opinion, as is every aspect of religious thought.
If you say you are Jewish...you are.
I agree.
Zionists, like all those who support them, are racist Nazis, as you know perfectly well.
Blanket assumption, combined with huge brushstrokes tend to eliminate the validity of most arguments. Deciding to hate on an entire group based on personal (and vague) dislike is one way to define bigotry...it is below you.
Who hates anyone? Zionists are Nazis, halfwits, timeservers, racists and people who love to kill children - all sorts except decent.
You calling a Zionist a Nazi is lie an idiot American calling Obama a socialist fascist. Zionism is Jewish nationalism while Nazism is German nationalism. The only way a person could be a Zionist and a Nazi would be for a German Nazi supporting a Jewish state but such people are almost universally pro-Palestinian so finding someone that actually fits your ranting is unlikely.
Last edited:
That is only a half truth; more accurately, calling a Zionist a Nazi is worse than calling Obama a socialist fascist. Reason: statement about Obama is at least somewhat true!
Obama is just a black Reagan who didn't leave the Democratic Party.
Compere Obama to real, not glorified Reagan. They are the same right down to paling around with the Reds (and Reagan was a Communist, Obama was just friends with a few) in their youth.
Tax policy is the difference. the current administration is creating and levying new taxes. Reagen's administration didn't
Obama administration has catered to the union, Reagan's did not.
Reagan didn't tax? :giggle: You might want to pick up a history book.
"We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying ten percent of his salary, and that’s crazy." --- President Reagan.
Yeah, I didn't say Reagan didn't tax, I said he didn't create any new taxes.
Obama did and he doesn't believe that the tax loopholes should be closed for the wealthiest citizens he may say so but he does the exact opposite. the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Meanwhile he plans on taking more from the working class and he pretends that they are rich.
There isn't a difference in what he says, but what he does is the opposite.
Yes, he isn't really very pivotal, at the time there are few conservatives in Congress. So you are making my point.
The Dems didn't have total power (even if it was close), every thing they did before '10 was due to Republican support. After '10 your attempted point has no relevance at all.
If Zionists are Nazis, then Hitler would have adored them you buffoon!
You take Zionists to be 'Jews', noodle. By definition they are not. Which particular Nazi thug did you have in mind for the Messiah, oh theologian?
The only thing the Zionists (and remember that Zionism is the twin child of racist German nationalism with Nazism) was to be the people running the death camps, not the victims. It is a rather limited learning, I think.
You completely missed my point. I didn't mention republicans. What I said is that there is very few conservatives in Congress.
Your point has no relevance.
You said so yourself republicans aren't conservatives. My point still stands.
Similar threads
