You have $50 Billion in Surplus (as a government). What do you do with it?

Dec 2009
119
0
Canada
What do you do when you find yourself with a surplus?

Some of my priorities include (in semi-order) paying off debt, working towards the international standard of donating 0.7% of your GDP to foreign aid (yes, this exists), foreign investments, and then perhaps looking at what kinds of programs could be improved.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
What do you do when you find yourself with a surplus?

Some of my priorities include (in semi-order) paying off debt, working towards the international standard of donating 0.7% of your GDP to foreign aid (yes, this exists), foreign investments, and then perhaps looking at what kinds of programs could be improved.

I'd invest in 'greening' our cities, building high-tech public schools schools, replacing the welfare state with a system of 'work and get provided for' programs (maintaining a limited welfare state for poor people with legit excuses not to work) and overhauling affirmative action to be income/cost of living based rather then racial based.
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
It really depends on what situation the government currently is in. If it was the United States federal government at the current moment, I would probably set it aside to help pay off the debt.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
It really depends on what situation the government currently is in. If it was the United States federal government at the current moment, I would probably set it aside to help pay off the debt.

If it was the US Gov't as is, I'd be asking how the hell we ended up with a sudden surplus. :p
 
Dec 2009
119
0
Canada
Well to be fair, most countries (not just the United States) have been making deficits these days. The only ones who have been experiencing growth and surpluses are the countries who don't really have to rely on the United States to have an economy. Look at China, India, or Australia as examples.

Having said that, I agree with myp at that paying off debts should be the number one priority, but it disgusts me that Canada is only 3/7 of the way through to reaching the 0.7% initiative (we currently donate 0.3%). At the same time, the US is at an even lower 0.15%.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
*Social programs to help the poor

*Backing up social security

*Fundamental restructuring of the system at various levels

*Giving back some money through working tax credit
 
Jul 2010
19
0
I would firstly pay off the debts that are piled up, then work to create more employment opportunities so that poverty can be erased. I would also work on the infrastructure and the internal defence system like the police.
 
Aug 2010
862
0
What do you do when you find yourself with a surplus?

Some of my priorities include (in semi-order) paying off debt, working towards the international standard of donating 0.7% of your GDP to foreign aid (yes, this exists), foreign investments, and then perhaps looking at what kinds of programs could be improved.


hookers and blow?

.....................................
 
Aug 2010
862
0
yes... but not for very long

the state doesn't have to use surplusses to pay down the debt.... in fact I'd argue that they'd find something fancy to spend it on rather than reducing the debt
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
And after that, maybe give the educational system a shot in the arm.
Throwing money at the educational system won't improve it. Money is not the problem- just look at how the teachers' unions operate. For education, I would say get the Federal government out- abolish the Department of Education, it has done nothing but politicized and worsened the educational system. We should look at a more local approach to schooling decisions because it has worked in the past/elsewhere and it does not involve billion dollar bureaucracies that care more about the politics of getting themselves reelected or reappointed than about what happens to the students (who's needs they really don't understand anyway.)
 
Aug 2010
230
0
You have $50 Billion in Surplus (as a government). What do you do with it?


I'd refund it to those who earned the money in the first place, and apologize profusely for the over taxation. If the surplus consisted of funds from the sale of state-owned resources, I suppose I'd set up an investment program similar to the Alaska Permanent Fund.
 
Aug 2010
862
0
Throwing money at the educational system won't improve it. Money is not the problem- just look at how the teachers' unions operate. For education, I would say get the Federal government out- abolish the Department of Education, it has done nothing but politicized and worsened the educational system. We should look at a more local approach to schooling decisions because it has worked in the past/elsewhere and it does not involve billion dollar bureaucracies that care more about the politics of getting themselves reelected or reappointed than about what happens to the students (who's needs they really don't understand anyway.)

^^^^


When all funds expended at the varying levels of government are totaled we spend more on education than anything else (though debt service may surpass it)

Money isn't the issue. The issue is largely cultural. Many students are raised in families that have HS students (or HS age) parents. They see teachers and administrators as adversaries not as allies in getting ahead in life.
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
Money isn't the issue. The issue is largely cultural. Many students are raised in families that have HS students (or HS age) parents. They see teachers and administrators as adversaries not as allies in getting ahead in life.
That is another good point and another reason for why throwing money at it won't work. Ironically, taking away some government benefits from some of those people might actually help do the trick. Once the moral hazard is gone, education and the jobs that can come with it start to look a lot better.
 
Aug 2010
862
0
That is another good point and another reason for why throwing money at it won't work. Ironically, taking away some government benefits from some of those people might actually help do the trick. Once the moral hazard is gone, education and the jobs that can come with it start to look a lot better.

Entire industries are devoted to finding and pointing out how children of color, and this is in nearly every incident a black child, have the cards stacked against them and therefore cannot compete.

How many generations need to be told that they'll never succeed unless they are given a leg by affirmative action before they start to believe that every problem they encounter has racism at its root? And worse, that they are incapable of competing on a level playing field even when racism cannot be blamed.
 
Aug 2010
230
0
To very badly misquote Nietzsche, Dude, racism is dead in this nation. From 2008 on, any ill effects related to race can be officially considered self-inflicted damages.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
To very badly misquote Nietzsche, Dude, racism is dead in this nation. From 2008 on, any ill effects related to race can be officially considered self-inflicted damages.

Racism is alive an well in America, the fact that Obama won't openly talk about his interracial identity unless pressed and insist on calling himself black is an excellent example.

Racism isn't as bad as it was but it isn't dead.
 
Top