Newt wins south carolina

[Patrick]

......according to CBS News, it wasn't even close. Further, south carolina voters rank him as most electable of the candidates. Now do some of you folks feel stupid? You certainly LOOK stupid.

Hint from Uncle Patrick: Don't swallow the lib media line hook, line, and sinker.

 

[Comet]

Now do some of you folks feel stupid? You certainly LOOK stupid.

Nothing positive can be gained by calling others "stupid."

Civil discourse is vital for logical and intellectual debate.

Besides, you predicted Santorum to win South Carolina. Does that mean you are "stupid?"

 

[Patrick]

Nothing positive can be gained by calling others "stupid."

Civil discourse is vital for logical and intellectual debate.

Besides, you predicted Santorum to win South Carolina. Does that mean you are "stupid?"

Uh no, I didn't predict that. Civil discourse is NOT due the stupid. Some people ARE stupid - pretending they aren't is falsehood.

What's happening is what I said all along - Romney got a plurality only because the conservatives were split among several candidates. Now that few are left, the conservatives will unite around Gingrich or Santorum, leaving Romney in the dust.

 

[Comet]

Uh no, I didn't predict that.

Yes sir, you did. In the thread I commenced about who you think will win the South Carolina primary, you voted for Santorum.

http://www.politicalfray.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=24

Who is the only one that voted for Santorum? You.

Is there another Patrick here besides you?

 

[Patrick]

Yes sir, you did. In the thread I commenced about who you think will win the South Carolina primary, you voted for Santorum.

http://www.politicalfray.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=24

Who is the only one that voted for Santorum? You.

Is there another Patrick here besides you?

Ya ok, but at least I didn't predict the "exact order" - and blow it.

 

[Comet]

Ya ok, but at least I didn't predict the "exact order" - and blow it.

Besides Romney and Gingrich being reversed, I was on the money.

However, you are attempting to change the subject to distract from your prevaricating. Why did you lie and claim you did not predict Santorum to win South Carolina when you indeed did?

Honesty is important in debate.

Besides, when you become known as a liar or one that engages in other acts of dishonesty, people lose credence in your words and no longer take you seriously.

And once you obtain that sort of reputation, it is extremely difficult to shed yourself of it. It follows you around and lingers for quite a long time.

Do you want to be taken seriously or have every word you utter dismissed?

That is for you to decide.

You talk about other people being stupid. What is stupid is lying, and then trying to distract with smoke and mirrors when called out on it.

 

[Patrick]

Besides Romney and Gingrich being reversed, I was on the money.

You blew it big time. You were sucked in by the lib media pro-Romney hype.

However, you are attempting to change the subject to distract from your prevaricating. Why did you lie and claim you did not predict Santorum to win South Carolina when you indeed did?

Honesty is important in debate.

Get off your high horse - I just forgot.

 

[DodgeFB]

You blew it big time. You were sucked in by the lib media pro-Romney hype.



Get off your high horse - I just forgot.

He gave you more slack than you give others! Are you the only one allowed to be on a "high horse"?

 

[Patrick]

He gave you more slack than you give others! Are you the only one allowed to be on a "high horse"?

I just made a vote. These obamabots have beeen prattling on about Romney's electability and inevitability for weeks, parroting the lib media line, and he's lost two of three contests.

 

[DodgeFB]

I just made a vote. These obamabots have beeen prattling on about Romney's electability and inevitability for weeks, parroting the lib media line, and he's lost two of three contests.

And so did the other guys.

 

[Comet]

And so did the other guys.

Touché.

Except for Ron Paul. Though we have had three primaries and three different winners, so it may be Ron Paul's turn next.

 

[Patrick]

And so did the other guys.

Uh......noooooo......actually, these obamabots have beeen prattling on about Romney's electability and inevitability for weeks, parroting the lib media line, and he's lost two of three contests

 

[DodgeFB]

Uh......noooooo......actually, these obamabots have beeen prattling on about Romney's electability and inevitability for weeks, parroting the lib media line, and he's lost two of three contests

And who won more than one? You can't have it both ways. That just does not work. There is a lot more electing left to do before any of them gets to O'bama.

 

[Patrick]

And who won more than one? You can't have it both ways.

I DIDN'T have it both ways. I wasn't saying Gingrich or Santorum were "inevitable" - just the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots.

 

[DodgeFB]

I DIDN'T have it both ways. I wasn't saying Gingrich or Santorum were "inevitable" - just the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots.

I think the " the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots" are getting to you. Most people see and know what they are doing and ignore them. You seem obsessed with them. We all know there is a big "left wing conspiracy" in this country. But it will go away. Just as Hillary's "right wing conspiracy" did a few years ago.

 

[myp]

I think the " the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots" are getting to you. Most people see and know what they are doing and ignore them. You seem obsessed with them. We all know there is a big "left wing conspiracy" in this country. But it will go away. Just as Hillary's "right wing conspiracy" did a few years ago.

In truth there is no conspiracy on either side. It is just the extremes on both sides that keep using this line to fearmonger.

Patrick likes to fearmonger through ad hominem attacks and ad nauseum arguments. The OP is a prime example. The troll likes to troll, no surprise here.

 

[DodgeFB]

In truth there is no conspiracy on either side. It is just the extremes on both sides that keep using this line to fearmonger.

Patrick likes to fearmonger through ad hominem attacks and ad nauseum arguments. The OP is a prime example. The troll likes to troll, no surprise here.

Don't you know that I already knew that!

 

[Patrick]

I think the " the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots" are getting to you. Most people see and know what they are doing and ignore them. You seem obsessed with them. We all know there is a big "left wing conspiracy" in this country. But it will go away. Just as Hillary's "right wing conspiracy" did a few years ago.

Ignoring the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots is FOOLISH in the extreme - they are destroying the country. Look what 8 years of RINO Bush 2 brought. Look what obama has brought. The lib media is a free cheerleading service for the leftwing, or libs if that's all they can get, or if necessary they'll settle for RINOs. And calling Bush a "rightwinger" is imbecilic beyond belief.

 

[DodgeFB]

Ignoring the RINOs, lib media, and obamabots is FOOLISH in the extreme - they are destroying the country. Look what 8 years of RINO Bush 2 brought. Look what obama has brought. The lib media is a free cheerleading service for the leftwing, or libs if that's all they can get, or if necessary they'll settle for RINOs. And calling Bush a "rightwinger" is imbecilic beyond belief.

I have been living without a president for me for years. After this election I still will not have one. Ever who wins I lose anyway.