2012 election, What do you think

Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Once upon a time... Democratic-Republican Party. Republicans split and joined the Wigs.

I suppose, however close they are or become, they can't literally join - you know, so as to maintain the charade of actual changes in what's going on.

If the crowd in power now keep doing what they are trying to do the Republicans will be in power quicker than you think. The older people vote and this crowd is messing with Medicare and Social Security. That scares a lot of older people and makes them mad.:D

So? You know, why should Government care about what the people think? People are basically a secondary consideration. Besides which, there is overwhelming public support for a social health care system. But, you know, that offer's not even on the table.

The Government is bending over backwards to make conditions as favourable for corporate industry as possible. You know, the whole "public option" paradigm. And health insurance industries are actually foaming at the mouths, because they even admit that private companies can't compete with it. That's essentially saying "we're so cumbersome and inefficient that you'll need to level the playing field for us" - and the Government (being business-friendly) is only too happy to do this. I don't need to tell you that this will only make it more expensive, rather than the money- and life-saving option it would otherwise be.

The fact is, you know, the less you intend to do about something, the more you have to talk about it. The whole "revolutionising healthcare" is basically complete farce. They're only going to extend the existing structures. A public healthcare system or, you know, a system that involves actually doing something about the fact that the US has the highest expenditure on health in the world! And frankly has... very little to show for it. A system that could remedy that would be something of a godsend, at least, it would be if the US was a democracy. I mean, God forbid elected representatives actually did something! Other than, you know, lying, cheating, stealing and killing or whatever.
 
Last edited:
Mar 2009
2,188
2
The US is a one-party state.
Maybe almost so, since the Republican Party seems to be in the doldrums for now, but give it time and then it may change to the usual 2-party again. The Democrats were in the same position in 2000. So maybe one can even say that they are at the opposites of one another's situations, for now Democrats are doing very well, but similar to the Republicans when they had been doing well, the Republicans will feed off every mistake the Democrats will made from hereon forward. Until the Republicans are in good shape again. Almost like see-saw. :)
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
I suppose, however close they are or become, they can't literally join - you know, so as to maintain the charade of actual changes in what's going on.

No, no. The Democratic-Republican Party (the modern day Democratic Party though they were referred to as Republicans at the time) was an American political party back in the day. The Republicans got tired of party policies and defected to the Wigs for a short time, thus creating the Democratic Party. Once the Wigs started to die out, thanks in part to the Know Nothing Party (yes, that was their name) they formed a new party based on the ideals of a democratic republic which they called the Republican Party.

I'm obviously assuming that you thought I was saying they should merge. If I misunderstood your response, disregard.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
No, no. The Democratic-Republican Party (the modern day Democratic Party though they were referred to as Republicans at the time) was an American political party back in the day. The Republicans got tired of party policies and defected to the Wigs for a short time, thus creating the Democratic Party. Once the Wigs started to die out, thanks in part to the Know Nothing Party (yes, that was their name) they formed a new party based on the ideals of a democratic republic which they called the Republican Party.

I'm obviously assuming that you thought I was saying they should merge. If I misunderstood your response, disregard.

Well, i figured you were talking about a past party. No worries there. :)

Though i was suggesting that these days, they're so similar, they may as well merge. And was then considering the political implications of such a maneouvre.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Well, i figured you were talking about a past party. No worries there. :)

Though i was suggesting that these days, they're so similar, they may as well merge. And was then considering the political implications of such a maneouvre.

Ha! If they did that 1 of 2 things would happen. 1. The major American parties would be the merged D/R, the LP and the SP USA. 2. (And I find this 1 more likely) The illusion of a multi party state is shattered resulting in revolution, ether Fascist, socialist/communist or both.
 
Nov 2009
3
0
Dirk, great info supplied. Very interesting point in history. You definitely got it right about the Republicans abandoning their platform.
 
Sep 2009
28
0
With obama asking for money to fight an American citizen, socker Mom that he is scarred stiff of,the people will see what he is. They will throw their support to Sarah Palin in a heartbeat. Already there is talk to send Sarah Palin the $5.00 instead of sending it to obama.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
the people will see what he is.

And what might that be? Is this another one of those conspiracy theories? :rolleyes:

They will throw their support to Sarah Palin in a heartbeat.

I doubt that. Obama was a very strategic choice. He's not in the Republican party, which got him support from the Left. He's also not a liberal, which got him support from the Right. It's quite clever, really. Fielding such a partial candidate as Sarah Palin actually hurt the cause of the Right.

Already there is talk to send Sarah Palin the $5.00 instead of sending it to Obama.

If there is, they're missing the point. You guys really need democracy. So do we, for that matter.
 
Mar 2009
2,751
6
Undisclosed
I favor locking the doors and sending all of them left and right home. Start out the new year with a completely new group picked at random from the unemployed.:mad:
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
I favor locking the doors and sending all of them left and right home. Start out the new year with a completely new group picked at random from the unemployed.:mad:

That would be a huge improvement, I daresay. One problem. Who chooses?
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
I favor locking the doors and sending all of them left and right home. Start out the new year with a completely new group picked at random from the unemployed.:mad:
Good idea. Maybe everyone should go back to the days of the Founding Fathers and draw up everything from scratch. The political system has to be in a rut.
 
Nov 2020
1,571
2
New Amsterdam
Given the existence as uttered forth in the public works of Puncher and Wattmann of a personal God quaquaquaqua with white beard quaquaquaqua outside time without extension who from the heights of divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown but time will tell and suffers like the divine Miranda with those who for reasons unknown but time will tell are plunged in torment plunged in fire whose fire flames if that continues and who can doubt it will fire the firmament that is to say blast heaven to hell so blue still and calm so calm with a calm which even though intermittent is better than nothing but not so fast and considering what is more that as a result of the labours left unfinished crowned by the Acacacacademy of Anthropopopometry of Essy-in-Possy of Testew and Cunard it is established beyond all doubt all other doubt than that which clings to the labours of men that as a result of the labours unfinished of Testew and Cunard it is established as hereinafter but not so fast for reasons unknown that as a result of the public works of Puncher and Wattmann it is established beyond all doubt that in view of the labours of Fartov and Belcher left unfinished for reasons unknown of Testew and Cunard left unfinished it is established what many deny that man in Possy of Testew and Cunard that man in Essy that man in short that man in brief in spite of the strides of alimentation and defecation is seen to waste and pine waste and pine and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the strides of physical culture the practice of sports such as tennis football running cycling swimming flying floating riding gliding conating camogie skating tennis of all kinds dying flying sports of all sorts autumn summer winter winter tennis of all kinds hockey of all sorts penicilline and succedanea in a word I resume and concurrently simultaneously for reasons unknown to shrink and dwindle in spite of the tennis I resume flying gliding golf over nine and eighteen holes tennis of all sorts in a word for reasons unknown in Feckham Peckham Fulham Clapham namely concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown but time will tell to shrink and dwindle I resume Fulham Clapham in a word the dead loss per head since the death of Bishop Berkeley being to the tune of one inch four ounce per head approximately by and large more or less to the nearest decimal good measure round figures stark naked in the stockinged feet in Connemara in a word for reasons unknown no matter what matter the facts are there and considering what is more much more grave that in the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman it appears what is more much more grave that in the light the light the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman that in the plains in the mountains by the seas by the rivers running water running fire the air is the same and than the earth namely the air and then the earth in the great cold the great dark the air and the earth abode of stones in the great cold alas alas in the year of their Lord six hundred and something the air the earth the sea the earth abode of stones in the great deeps the great cold on sea on land and in the air I resume for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis the facts are there but time will tell I resume alas alas on on in short in fine on on abode of stones who can doubt it I resume but not so fast I resume the skull to shrink and waste and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis on on the beard the flames the tears the stones so blue so calm alas alas on on the skull the skull the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the labours abandoned left unfinished graver still abode of stones in a word I resume alas alas abandoned unfinished the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the skull alas the stones Cunard (mêlée, final vociferations) tennis… the stones… so calm… Cunard… unfinished…”
 
Top