Immigration Amnesty Bill - Makes Us LESS Safe

Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
The union of workers who do the screening of new immigrants, fears the Senate Amnesty bill is likely to force rubberstamping dangerous applicants. Actually, rubberstamping has been going on for years, while USCIS workers are often unable to keep up with the torrent of immigrants flowing in to satisfy politicians cravings for new votes.The new bill will intensify this bad situation and make it much worse.

SO MUCH FOR THIS BILL SUPPOSEDLY MAKING US SAFER!
Remember all the talk about how the amnesty bill would bring 11 million illegal aliens "out of the shadows" and make us safer by running them through thorough background checks?
Not going to happen, according to today's bombshell from the head of the union that represents the officers and staff at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) which is responsible for processing immigrants.
Here's what Kenneth Palinkas, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council 119, told Congress and the public today:
"The culture at USCIS encourages all applications to be approved, discouraging proper investigation into red flags and discouraging the denial of any applications . . .USCIS has been turned into an 'approval machine.' "
The USCIS union today joined the union for ICE agents (Immigration and Custom Enforcement) in opposing the S. 744 amnesty, noting that it fails to provide for necessary in-person interviews and for those who have committed serious immigration and criminal offenses.
"The legislation was written with special interests -- producing a bill that makes the current system worse, not better. . . (The bill would) damage public safety and national security and should be opposed by lawmakers."
The union said it can't protect American security at today's rate of applications, and in no way could do so with millions of additional ones coming in.
 
Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
Because that's all that matters...

How would quotes from the bill fit the TOPIC of this thread ? How could they, in any way, change what Kenneth Palinkas, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council 119, told Congress and the public today ?
"The culture at USCIS encourages all applications to be approved, discouraging proper investigation into red flags and discouraging the denial of any applications . . .USCIS has been turned into an 'approval machine.' "
And how would quotes change this ? >> The USCIS union today joined the union for ICE agents (Immigration and Custom Enforcement) in opposing the S. 744 amnesty, noting that it fails to provide for necessary in-person interviews and for those who have committed serious immigration and criminal offenses.

And how would they, in any way, change this ? >> The union said it can't protect American security at today's rate of applications, and in no way could do so with millions of additional ones coming in.

Those are rhetorical questions. I'll give you the answers. They wouldn't & couldn't.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
How would quotes from the bill fit the TOPIC of this thread ? How could they, in any way, change what Kenneth Palinkas, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council 119, told Congress and the public today ?
"The culture at USCIS encourages all applications to be approved, discouraging proper investigation into red flags and discouraging the denial of any applications . . .USCIS has been turned into an 'approval machine.' "
And how would quotes change this ? >> The USCIS union today joined the union for ICE agents (Immigration and Custom Enforcement) in opposing the S. 744 amnesty, noting that it fails to provide for necessary in-person interviews and for those who have committed serious immigration and criminal offenses.

And how would they, in any way, change this ? >> The union said it can't protect American security at today's rate of applications, and in no way could do so with millions of additional ones coming in.

Those are rhetorical questions. I'll give you the answers. They wouldn't & couldn't.

Remember all that 'Death Panel' BS during the Obamacare debate? The bill that became law had no such provisions and indeed 'Death Panels', while not blatantly called such, was already the status quo. Thats why the actual wording in the bill matters, what people say the bill says and what the bill actually says doesn't always match. Until you provide the relevant text, I have no way of knowing if the fears presented are legitimate or baseless.
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
I am not well read on this bill in particular, so I won't comment on it, but generally more immigration is probably a good thing for the US right now- especially more high skilled immigration.
 
Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
Remember all that 'Death Panel' BS during the Obamacare debate? The bill that became law had no such provisions and indeed 'Death Panels', while not blatantly called such, was already the status quo. Thats why the actual wording in the bill matters, what people say the bill says and what the bill actually says doesn't always match. Until you provide the relevant text, I have no way of knowing if the fears presented are legitimate or baseless.

The OP reports the words of the The USCIS union, the American Federation of Government Employees Council 119 as well as the words of the union for ICE agents (Immigration and Custom Enforcement). I'll go with that. I don't feel like I have to read every word of every bill.
 
Dec 2012
677
13
Florida
I am not well read on this bill in particular, so I won't comment on it, but generally more immigration is probably a good thing for the US right now- especially more high skilled immigration.

Astounding how you can even consider such a preposterous idea.

Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($40 Billion year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, fresh water, electricity, food, jobs, etc)

Immigration (with a couple of rare exceptions) has been bad for the US since 1860, when we passed our optimum population (30 million), relative to our resource base.
We now now stand at over 10 times that optimum population. Few things could be more damaging to America right now than immigration.
 
Last edited:
Top