Insane religious people

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
Still it takes an insane person to go through the effort of creating such and elaborate farce.
I wouldn't call them insane as it is meant as a parody. Perhaps a bit extreme and maybe lacking in taste (depending on how you feel about it), but not insane. Satire can get pretty raunchy though, so for those purposes I guess it really isn't that crazy.
 
May 2010
10
0
I think the worst way to piss these people off is to challenge their beliefs that will get under their skin and start an argument. I tend to not talk about anything near religion with these guys
 
May 2010
56
0
Even if this isn't a joke there are a few people who are giving Christianity a bad name. There is a possibility that there is someone who is pretending to make these posts as a Christian and doing this and making it obvious while doing so by adding the terms Christian to the person's profile while making such sick comments.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
The reason people think this is real is because it's the kind of nutty stuff religious extremists of a number of religions would spout. ;)
 
Apr 2010
105
0
I hope it is just a sick joke.
So what? One mentally unstable person makes a few foolish remarks. The "True Christian" title is the same as "Senator" or "Intern" on this website, its automatically given.
Just as no one here is a real senator, .....

I also think the girl should keep the baby, as abortion is wrong.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Just as no one here is a real senator, .....

I'm a real anarchist. ;)

Just saying.

I think that things I find morally wrong, such as murder, or something, can be justified in certain circumstances.
 
May 2010
21
0
Fuhgeddaboudit, New York
Spoof or not, I have definitely heard, and have been nauseated by the things said on that site, that also came from the mouths of Christian extremists. I have definitely used this place as an example before.. most notably, regarding this post, where the people believe that there is no such thing as rape between a husband and wife, and that a man has a right to take his wife by force, and then another person went on to cite scriptures from the Bible, supporting this theory. As seen in this quote:

Sister Rachel, I am glad to hear this come from a fine, outstanding Christian woman. Our detractors like to throw baseless accusations that we are a bunch of sexist men who use the Bible to justify our wants.

We only need to look no further than our beloved King James Bible to see that God sanctions the right for a man to enter into intercourse with his wife at any time he sees fit. Just a cursory glance at a couple of Bible verses show this to be so...

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

You can't be fruitful and multiply if your wife is closing herself to you. She is going against God's Word? by denying the husband sex!

Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Exodus 20:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

From these two posts we can clearly see that God has intended women as property of their husbands. If something is your property, you have a right to do whatever you want with it. The Genesis quote tells us that men have the obligation to rule over women. The exodus quote implicitly states that women are property by lumping them in with all other objects which would be considered property.

1st Timothy 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1st Timothy 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1st Timothy 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Women are Saved? through childbirth. But when she refuses to give into her husband's demands for sex she is damning herself on the road to Hell.

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

It doesn't get any more transparent than that! Submit yourself unto your husbands! This is the Word of God? right here!

We can see through proper understanding of the Holy Bible that God intends for men to have sex with their wives at their own will and discretion. Marital "rape" is nothing more than an invented modern-day concept created by God-hating feminazis. As True Christians?, we need to write to our congressmen and organize protests so that we can strike down these unholy and draconian "marital rape" laws. God is not pleased!

I posted this in a topic on another forum, as reasoning as to why I don't identify myself as a Christian.. and why I choose to stay away from ALL religions.. and as a point regarding the fact that my grandfather isn't alone when believing the the same. I asked my mom if she believes the same, since she is a Christian, and she says no, and that the people on that forum are not real Christians.

I agree with her in that respect, and although she is a Christian, she is nothing like the people on that forum, and does not agree with a lot of my grandfather's extreme beliefs.. especially where marriage and gender roles are concerned. My mother, and late-great grandmother are Christians, and they are full of kindness and love, and not hatred like these people.
 
Last edited:
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
I absolutely agree with Black Angel that certainly not all religious people are like this. In fact, I would say a minority. Many of my friends are still religious, and my family is, but none of them would dare to quote the "abominations" of Leviticus to me. Partly because they may be afraid i'll hurt them (which may be a fair assumption), but I also don't think they agree with it.
 
Mar 2011
746
160
Rhondda, Cymru
Religious people who support the status quo are normally crazy, because it is against their own interest, like Fox News. Those who, for whatever reason, believe they have to propitiate an insane fifth-century-BC celestial tyrant are as mad as He is. Those who look for decent ways to behave and theoretical constructs to support this aim, however, are decent and good, like the Quakers, for instance.
 
Feb 2011
299
0
Canada
Just came across this recently, curious what the people here think.

68eug.jpg

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=16536

Damn, I like this guy! He is right. It is all the bitch's fault, for tempting him into sin.
 
Feb 2011
299
0
Canada
I'm a real anarchist. ;)

Just saying.

I think that things I find morally wrong, such as murder, or something, can be justified in certain circumstances.

You are an 'anarchist', and a 'socialist'? Someone is quite confused here, since the both are polar opposites.

Bi-polar, are you?

Oh, you are a Jew? That explains things. Jews work to confuse all others in order to more easily pick their pockets.
 
Mar 2009
2,751
6
Undisclosed
You are an 'anarchist', and a 'socialist'? Someone is quite confused here, since the both are polar opposites.

Bi-polar, are you?

Oh, you are a Jew? That explains things. Jews work to confuse all others in order to more easily pick their pockets.

He is a much better person than you and more respected on this forum. He is also my friend.
 
Jan 2012
1,975
5
Texas
I find this to be repulsive. And yes there are crazy people out there from all groups. But they don't speak for me, and that should be enough. Just like malik shabaz dosent speak for all black people when he said that we should kill white children. Nor dose the klan speak for white people, or saddam speak for all iraqies
 
Feb 2011
299
0
Canada
I find this to be repulsive. And yes there are crazy people out there from all groups. But they don't speak for me, and that should be enough. Just like malik shabaz dosent speak for all black people when he said that we should kill white children. Nor dose the klan speak for white people, or saddam speak for all iraqies

If a White man ever suggested that we should kill all Black children, he would be doing 20 - 40 in a State Penitentiary. That is fact, further reason why I am a fascist. We fascists would have had Malik Shabaz executed for even daring to suggest his race has even the right to THINK such thoughts about ours.
 
Jan 2012
1,975
5
Texas
If a White man ever suggested that we should kill all Black children, he would be doing 20 - 40 in a State Penitentiary. That is fact, further reason why I am a fascist. We fascists would have had Malik Shabaz executed for even daring to suggest his race has even the right to THINK such thoughts about ours.

I find it absurd to assume you have any control over thought what so ever
 
Top