You seem to either have a strange agenda, are not following the logic, or have trouble putting things into context.
In no way did I bring up the subject of forcing beliefs onto other people. In no way did I mention what sort of activities certain groups perpetrate. My comments pertained to the philosophical aspects of the beliefs, and to the correct meaning of words being used in the discussion.
The section of my post to which you refer was laying out secular, non-religious logic for the concept of the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule, in its phrasing and name, comes to us through religion. However, the concept behind the rule does not need to be based on religious beliefs. And that is the crux of your original statement. You claimed that you could not follow the Golden Rule without religion…I laid out logic that shows the statement is false. It is entirely possible for religious and secular thinking to overlap at times.