Denial of facts is not a defense
The nix film is the smoking gun that was given to me this past October. In it, Greer's left arm/hand cross over in unison with the headshot and that visual fact completely destroys those movements that are not supposed to be happening in zapruder. Those movements explain why the government had to add the three points of fakery to cover those movments which killed Kennedy in the Zapruder film. I have never been challenged and never will be. The only thing that will happen is researchers will for the most part ignore that the real truth about the fatal shot has finally been articulated to a point of no refutation.
People would get a little uptight after you posted about 50 times in a row with material that you could have annoyed people less with by putting it all into one. I swear to god I spend time debating the crooks in some of the 9/11 conspiracies, and even the Pentagon flyover kooks aren't that annoying. No offense but you're not convincing people anymore with 50,000 repetitious posts anymore than you are with everything in one. In most forums your actions would be a breach of their MA regardless of any credibility you claim to have.
7forever, let me introduce you to one of my favorite kicks. See this:
http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/451/1238970139182a.jpg
What is the relevance of this? Well, for starters it involves the same thing you're doing. You isolated a freeze frame and cherrypicked it to exploit an optical illusion in the footage.
In my little example above, closer inspection reveals that the images consist of fruit products, whose presentation on-screen gives the optical illusion of viewing "accessories."
Likewise, upon closer inspection, your footage shows what I told you over a month ago; it's not a hand with a pistol, it's the passenger moving his head in the footage. Beyond making for a cruely morbid **** brix demotivational poster with the eye trick it plays there's nothing you've posed to suggest it's what you claim it is. Furthermore your supposed video analysis is absolutely amateurish.
You are not in any position to determine for people what they do or do not know. For one your accusations that people are "denying visual facts" is blatantly untrue and transparent, in fact the circumstances are quite different. You "want" to be right; you want to "believe."You want to believe in the driver shooter so badly you'll overlook even the most basic of errors in order to reach your desired conclusion.
I don't follow many CT's regularly, so I have only this and the 9/11 ones to compare with, but 7forever's activity most closely resembles the habits of CIT's pentagon flyover theories. Out of all the "sub theories" in these two areas that I've seen, the greer shooter version, and the CIT north of citgo theories represent some of the most absolutely stubborn people I've ever seen, stubborn as in, debate's not really an option; they're just "debating" to project themselves onto other people.
The nix film is the smoking gun that was given to me this past October. In it, Greer's left arm/hand cross over in unison with the headshot and that visual fact completely destroys those movements that are not supposed to be happening in zapruder. Those movements explain why the government had to add the three points of fakery to cover those movments which killed Kennedy in the Zapruder film. I have never been challenged and never will be. The only thing that will happen is researchers will for the most part ignore that the real truth about the fatal shot has finally been articulated to a point of no refutation.
