You're a crybaby who expects everyone to spoonfeed you well known facts - look elsewhere - I'm not your momma.
You're a crybaby who expects everyone to spoonfeed you well known facts - look elsewhere - I'm not your momma.
You're a crybaby who expects everyone to spoonfeed you well known facts - look elsewhere - I'm not your momma.
No, I expect you to back up your arguments. I'm not asking you to find citations for my points, why should I do so for you?
Why would I do so for you? I don't give a sh_t what you think, and I'm not your tutor.
Citing sources for academic papers and tutoring obamabot morons are REALLY separate things. I've done this citation and tutoring stuff on the net for 15 years, but I realized it's stupid to do it - when the bot himself can within SECONDS verify it if he wants to. I sometimes post links, and when I don't the info is within easy reach for anyone who is really interested in the truth.
That's not how it works. If you make a claim, don't expect someone else to back it up for you. Stop being lazy or is it that you can't back anything up?
I don't have to back up ANYTHING for you - I DON'T GIVE A SH_T what you believe or don't believe. Again, anyone who values the truth can easily verify anything I say for themselves if they are interested.
If you are making a new claim the burden of proof is on you. You said it yourself: http://www.politicalfray.com/showpost.php?p=21175&postcount=31
You really have problems with intellectual integrity don't you? You must have made a horrible scientist or more likely a great scientist in your head.
You claimed to have multiple degrees in Astrophysics. If you really got through those degrees (which at this point with all due respect I think you are completely fabricating), you surely understand the strict standards in making scientific and logical claims. If you took your science seriously you probably would transfer that over to the logic of debate as well.
Either way, go read about logical fallacies- you are full of them. Here is a quick suggestion: http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html
I said no such thing. I said I have a BS in physics, and MS in astronomy, and an MS in computer science. No doubt about it - you have either reading comprehension or short term memory problems.
Yes, I do - for readers for which there is some reason for me to care what they think.
I departed from my prescribed undergrad science curriculum to take a thorough-going course in logic, and of course got an "A" in the course - I don't need lectures on logic from you or anyone else.
I departed from my prescribed undergrad science curriculum to take a thorough-going course in logic, and of course got an "A" in the course - I don't need lectures on logic from you or anyone else.
And yet despite you're 'logic' you join a debate forum and yet fail to present any kind of logical arguments or understand why you have to cite your statements of 'fact'. Ether debate properly or stop wasting our time.
I departed from my prescribed undergrad science curriculum to take a thorough-going course in logic, and of course got an "A" in the course - I don't need lectures on logic from you or anyone else.
Anyone can get an "A" in a course. That doesn't mean you are the perfect debater
