Question for Christians #1
- Thread starter Patrick
- Start date
-
- Tags
- christians question
My response was not to the point about Jesus existing- I do believe he was a real man. My response was to the claim that he is the son of God or that God in the form you say he exists actually does.
Also, statistics cannot be "beaten" that doesn't make sense. If you meant that there is still a small probability you are right, sure, but don't pretend the burden of proof is on those who don't believe when the chance that you are right is very near 0.
Yes but there is statistical likelihood. Just like the chance that the atoms in the sky reflect mostly blue light is a very high statistical likelihood and the chance that it reflects purple is a lot lower.
Different colors are different wavelengths of light. Also you are taking my analogies way too literally. They are analogies.
I want to see a chart or grahp that shows statistics of god not existing.
You have no proof the fact that you bicker with me continuously shows that you believe God doesn't exist based on not the slightest bit of proof evidence or anything. But your in ability to think there things that are possable, I have said i have no proof, i never persented proof, but one key piece of eveidence is that the univers exists.
If there is no Gkd then why is there a universe
No, I am just asking you to take my analogies as analogies and not nit-pick them for irrelevant details.
There have been plenty of studies. I also said the organized religion God you believe is probably not real (and I think any God who cares about humans)- something like Spinoza's God is much more possible.
You are taking it too literally because that is not the point- it is an analogy. Also, the wavelengths are measurable- I am not talking about perception here. That all said, even the perception is likely very similar due to the similarity in neurophysiological processes. But again, none of that is the point here. It is an ANALOGY.
It is not an analogy, and if it is lets work with it.
An istrument that masures light is supposed to be clarivoiant. It measuers wavelingth not human perception.
It was really my analogy, but it proves that you believe what you are told to, yet i question everything.
You abandon the analogy when it no longer serves your purpose,
How dose a mesuring device know what i see?
Oh brother, I am not arguing with you about this. You might question everything (as do I), but you do not know how to statistically weigh things and you are unfamiliar with a lot of the empirical, analytical, and other research work done in matters including this (existence of God) and monetary economics. Questioning everything is one thing, but after that it is important to do your due diligence and do you homework before you argue such hard-lined positions. I am open to changing my mind even now, but with arguments as you use them, it won't be changed because you do not have anything valid to say.
No you dont, you believe what you are told to. Based on whatever everyone else thinks, you said as much.
You prove you cant think outside of your own opinion because you think mine is undebatable. But my opinion says that I believe in god against the odds. And you cant produce any odds against GOD.
Because you are exactly where i am. You dont know. No man can know.
As for economics, you were basing everything on the dollar, not reality.
Work on your debating skills
Similar threads
