Revolutionary Guard decapitated!

Mar 2009
2,188
2

Are you sure Pakistan is blamed? I found the following in the article you quoted:
The region's top prosecutor, Mohammad Marzieh, was quoted by the semi-official ISNA news agency as saying Jundallah claimed responsibility for the blast in the Pishin district near the Pakistani border.
Is there a connection between Jundallah and Pakistan?
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Are you sure Pakistan is blamed? I found the following in the article you quoted:

Is there a connection between Jundallah and Pakistan?

Iran is claiming Pakistan is sheltering their leader, sort of like Afghanistan with Osama Bin Laden. Lets see where this goes.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Iran is claiming Pakistan is sheltering their leader, sort of like Afghanistan with Osama Bin Laden. Lets see where this goes.
Right, that certainly is cause for worry. All we need is for Iran and Pakistan to be in a state of war! That will probably minimize the gravity of the situation with the Taliban in Afghanistan by an enormous margin and completely change the dynamics of war in that area.
 
Last edited:
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Right, that certainly is cause for worry. All we need is for Iran and Pakistan to be in a state of war! That will probably minimize the gravity of the situation with the Taliban in Afghanistan by an enormous margin and completely change the dynamics of war in that area.

No, the Taliban would likely become a larger issue as they'd be at war with Iran as well. Free for all... With nukes. :eek:
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
The Taliban are disliked throughout the Muslim world. It's a shame that the US didn't use that against them when there was the chance.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
The Taliban are disliked throughout the Muslim world. It's a shame that the US didn't use that against them when there was the chance.

Iran offered to help us invade, then President Bush went with that 'Axis of Evil' and ruined it, the idiot.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
No, the Taliban would likely become a larger issue as they'd be at war with Iran as well. Free for all... With nukes. :eek:
Well I guess then the US and Iran have at least one common cause. That has to be at least a positive in all of this.:D
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Well I guess then the US and Iran have at least one common cause. That has to be at least a positive in all of this.:D

Not really. Iran offered to help us invade Afghanistan. A few days later, President Bush called them part of the 'Axis of Evil'. Iran would likely tell us to go screw ourselves. :p
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Not really. Iran offered to help us invade Afghanistan. A few days later, President Bush called them part of the 'Axis of Evil'. Iran would likely tell us to go screw ourselves.

It's also in Israel's interest that Iran remain in the so-called "Axis of Evil". And as the Israel Lobby will tell you, what is in Israel's interest is always in the interests of the US. :rolleyes::p

That's why you give them so much cash and transfer so many free fighter jets. ;)
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Not really. Iran offered to help us invade Afghanistan. A few days later, President Bush called them part of the 'Axis of Evil'. Iran would likely tell us to go screw ourselves. :p
Hillary Clinton and Obama have also acted quite firmly with Iran. Perhaps they have knowledge about Iran that we do not have, perhaps there is an element of truth about "Axis of Evil"?
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Hillary Clinton and Obama have also acted quite firmly with Iran. Perhaps they have knowledge about Iran that we do not have, perhaps there is an element of truth about "Axis of Evil"?

The gov't is able to hold on to power because they can present us as an enemy. The moment we start acting nice, the gov't loses it's legitimacy. A theocratic gov't ruling a Western nation, it wouldn't take much to depose them.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Actually, to be honest, i think they're acting so "firmly" with Iran because they don't understand Middle Eastern politics.

And, in regards to the Middle East, i have to say, i miss the old days, when they were secular democracies.
 
Last edited:
Mar 2009
2,188
2
The moment we start acting nice, the gov't loses it's legitimacy. A theocratic gov't ruling a Western nation, it wouldn't take much to depose them.
To be truthful, I don't think the US matters as much to Iran as the US may think it does. Whether the US acts nicely or firmly do not really matter that much. Iran also now has an ally in Russia, so does not really have to worry about sanctions at all, anyway.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
To be truthful, I don't think the US matters as much to Iran as the US may think it does. Whether the US acts nicely or firmly do not really matter that much. Iran also now has an ally in Russia, so does not really have to worry about sanctions at all, anyway.

You forgot about Turkey as well.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
To be truthful, I don't think the US matters as much to Iran as the US may think it does. Whether the US acts nicely or firmly do not really matter that much. Iran also now has an ally in Russia, so does not really have to worry about sanctions at all, anyway.

You forgot about Turkey as well.

I'll actually explain that one, i've decided. Iran and Turkey have an understanding that Iran will sell Turkey oil - which will be damn handy considering the nature of oil (i.e. a finite fossil fuel). Also, Turkey has adopted a kind of middle man position between Iran and the West. Iran has recently requested Turkey as a mediator a lot.
 
Top