His biological parents were Syrian Muslim man and American woman. This information is conveniently left out by news channels and only talk of his adopting parents. Most US news channels want to distance themselves from Muslims to link with anything that is good.
When Onasis died (last husband of Jacky) but she was buried next to John F. and Kennedy got all Onasis wealth transferred to them.
Same way, lets accept that it was Muslim DNA which created a visionary (Steve) whose foster parents gave his last name (Jobs). His father was Abdulfattah Jandali
Same way, lets accept that it was Muslim DNA which created a visionary (Steve) whose foster parents gave his last name (Jobs). His father was Abdulfattah Jandali
There is no such thing as "Muslim DNA" or "Christian DNA" or "Hindu DNA" - religion is not a genetic creation- it is a man-made one.
When it comes to something bad, white man is quick to label it Muslim but when it comes to something good, White man becomes more objective and removes all labels.
And most of the time we don't even know who the hell it was. It is plain to see you have an agenda. So with everyone knowing that we go from here.
It is not a conspiracy. There is many times no need to state the religion of a person since it is often irrelevant info. It is about context. I doubt you say the religion of whoever you praise whether they be Christian, Muslim, or other every time you talk about them.
How about you try to prove your radical claim before saying that I am in denial? It wouldn't be because NO PROOF exists because it is NOT TRUE, would it?
Also to prove that even you don't always say the religion of the person you are talking about since it is not relevant- you left out that Steve Jobs was Buddhist.
STOP STEREOTYPING. There are plenty of arab people that accomplish great things even today. You are taking the views of the small radical extremists and stereotyping them onto all arabic people.
Arabs were paying Jews ridiculous amounts of money or their banking and trading skills and their knowledge of Greek and Latin (which gave them access to Roman science, history and knowledge) while Europeans were tying to kill them all. heir concepts of social organization is why the West exists today in it's modern form.
Vague, fuzzy defamation. Get specific: persons, places, events - maybe even a date or two? Who can possibly tell what you're talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus#Non-Muslims_under_the_Caliphate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Turkey#Ottoman_era
http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/242/the-position-of-jews-and-christians-in-the-ottoman-empire
It was the Middle Ages and they were minorities so by no means were they equal but they were tolerated and enjoyed far more rights then they did in Europe where they were killed whenever the smallest thing went wrong. For the most part (I say most part because sometimes a Jew hater was in power) their treatment in the Muslim world consisted of higher taxes and the gov't showing a pro-Muslim bias during deputes. In fact the Ottomans went so far as to organize Jews, Christians and Muslims into their own nations which were allowed to live by their own laws and collect their own taxes (though they made no consideration for sects).
Lessee ..... so analogously, you're saying we should stand up and applaud Charley who beats his wife, as opposed to the guy down the street who killed his?
Putting aside ancient history, the arabs have spent the last 60 years trying to finish the job Hitler left undone.
Really? I don't see Jews being round up and exterminated. Hell they're in the Iranian Gov't.
Riiiiiiiiight, they're in the iranian government.
I know that's false, because I'm Minister of Defense for Iran. The arabs haven't succeeded because, unlike in 1933-1945, jews nowadays fight back.
Similar threads
