so what your telling me is that he a navy seal could take down a saber tooth with out his armor
if he had a spear or a knife like the caveman yes he could
so what your telling me is that he a navy seal could take down a saber tooth with out his armor
if he had a spear or a knife like the caveman yes he could
yes byut the navy seal is trained for the enviroment of hunting fellowso what your saying is the training is about equal
yes byut the navy seal is trained for the enviroment of hunting fellow
man whilst the caveman is trained to kill animals:smug:
tell me this which is harder to fight a Saber Tooth Tiger or Navy seal with no weapons and no armor
Taking on a sabre-tooth tiger with a spear wouldnt be very wise would it? Probably the cavemen would make a trap...a covered pit...to catch it and then spear it from the safety of the ground above?
He could try to trap the Navy Seal by the same method but seeing as his quarry would be expecting something like that, he probably wouldnt succeed![]()
your speculating that cavemen killed sabertooth tigers on any kind of regular basis seeing as how hard it would be. most likely greater majority of cavemen to go against the tiger died a gruesome bloody death.
you cant say definitly not small animals what gives you the abilityu to decide what did and didnt happen at the time. Cavemen were big but not bigg enough to make hand to hand fights with saber tooth tigers a daily or weekly occurence. Ans they were
beyond that several cave men would team up to take out bigger animals, they used weapons and snares, they didnt just walk up and punch a lion in the face and start eating it.By caveman, I have to assume this discussion is about Neanderthals. There has been a lot of recent discoveries that seem to consistently revise the perception that Neanderthals were simply brutish dimwits who hunted saber tooth tigers and cave bears.
Their brain size was significantly larger than modern humans. Recent finds have shown that they painted artistically, and decorated their bodies. They ate plants, fish, seafood, small mammals, and birds, as well as larger herbivores such as deer, horses, rhinos, and elephants. They did not do hand to hand combat with tigers and bears, that simply wouldn't be nutritionally efficient, given the mortal risk involved in killing large predators. Large herbivores are more likely to leave fossils than plants and small game, so earlier ideas about their diet were skewed towards larger animals such as mammoths.
Neanderthals would have an advantage of arm strength, but I doubt their occasional skirmishes with other humans would give them the ability to defeat a professionally trained hand to hand expert (such as a Navy seal). Trapping large herbivores (it is extremely unlikely that they confronted them directly), wouldn't give them the skill to defeat a sufficiently trained modern human. Imho.
That is the advantage of modern humans. They are versatile. They are specialists. They are experts at learning. I certainly wouldn't put a nuclear physicist up against a caveman, but a Navy seal...
Neanderthal didn't survive because through the generations they weren't able to adapt to the changing environments and eventually became extinct. Theories have it that both neanderthal and an equivalent of modern man lived during the same time and perhaps even encountered each other during their routine migrations.
True a Navy Seal would be able to take down a neanderthal simply because of his training and ability to think quicker then the neanderthal. Brute strength does serve it's purpose and if caught, the Navy Seal would have a hard time to escape the neanderthal.
I doubt a cave man could defeat a Navy Seal. Those guys go through a hell of a training program to make the grade. Most do not complete it.![]()
Neanderthal didn't survive because through the generations they weren't able to adapt to the changing environments and eventually became extinct. Theories have it that both neanderthal and an equivalent of modern man lived during the same time and perhaps even encountered each other during their routine migrations.
True a Navy Seal would be able to take down a neanderthal simply because of his training and ability to think quicker then the neanderthal. Brute strength does serve it's purpose and if caught, the Navy Seal would have a hard time to escape the neanderthal.
Agreed. Both are human, but one is extensively trained to fight with both weapons and in hand-to-hand combat. The other is simply surviving off the land. Not educated enough to build a house or count past the number of digits on his hands and feet. It'd be like saying a backwoods hillbilly could take a Navy SEAL. Not likely.
People say the caveman would be able to defeat a navyseal in hand to hand combat i do not understand this for a seal is trained to kill hunt and be the peak of personal fitness?
What do you say about it