Ignoring the attempt at trolling, you still haven't explained 'Define "is".'
Are you trying to say is means brainwashed? You need to read a dictionary then.
Want vs Think
- Thread starter a777pilot
- Start date
Ignoring the attempt at trolling, you still haven't explained 'Define "is".'
Are you trying to say is means brainwashed? You need to read a dictionary then.
No, I feel I am to old to discuss such things anymore. Out was a defense bill Clinton Gabe at his impeachment hearing.
It was cultural satire, but I remember it. I don't know how old you are but I imagine you are young.
I get it now...he seems to be referring to this:
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."
They don't call him "Slick Willy" for nothin'.
Does not explaion your unpleasant reaction however.
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."
They don't call him "Slick Willy" for nothin'.
Does not explaion your unpleasant reaction however.
Originally Posted by clax
It means you are owned and brainwashed completely by the biased media.
Don't get upset with me because you don't know your nation's history.
Okay, the original post made no sense.
Not for the reasons you seem to think but I do enjoy spinning things so that I can lie without actually lying. It's good mental exercise.
Lie without lying? That is a peculiar statement.
I always thought spin was a sanitary word for lie.
Think of the claim of, "I drank water," after someone drinks soda. It's not actually a lie when you consider soda is just water with CO2 added. I try to be more complex of course but that's it in a nutshell. It's fun when people know I'm BSing them but fumble around trying to actually pinpoint what I'm actually lying about, it got me out of quite a bit of trouble with my parents growing up.
Think of the claim of, "I drank water," after someone drinks soda. It's not actually a lie when you consider soda is just water with CO2 added. I try to be more complex of course but that's it in a nutshell. It's fun when people know I'm BSing them but fumble around trying to actually pinpoint what I'm actually lying about, it got me out of quite a bit of trouble with my parents growing up.
I bet it did, are you studying law, perhaps that is the profession for someone with your talent
I certainly hope you are wrong. If the O wins this nation will never be that same......and not for the better.
Wow...320?
Landslide time.
History in the making:
- James Monroe's 231 electoral votes to John Quincy Adams's 1 electoral vote in 1820. (99.2% margin)
- Franklin D. Roosevelt's 523 electoral votes to Alf Landon's 8 electoral votes in 1936. (97% margin)
- Ronald Reagan's 525 electoral votes to Walter Mondale's 13 electoral votes in 1984. (95.2% margin)
- Richard Nixon's 520 electoral votes to George McGovern's 17 electoral votes and John Hospers's 1 in 1972. (93.3% margin)
Rock on Romney!
LOL!
I'm sure that the candidates will be surprised to know there are a total of 410 EC votes. That will make the math easier for them.
Mathematics may be wrong (funny how you note in now), yet the point remains. (again, something you may be ignoring)
