Venezuela- Serious threat to freedom of speech

GOP

Feb 2010
360
0
United Kingdom
This is sad. Of course it's not surprising for me to see this, it's socialist leaders do - shut people up.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Wonder whether another revolution is in the coming? Can't be good for the country's economy.

Chavez is extremely popular. Venezuelans love him, they won't get rid of him. Besides, there's always election time, if they do.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Chavez is extremely popular. Venezuelans love him, they won't get rid of him. Besides, there's always election time, if they do.

I love how people call him a dictator for getting rid of term limits. :giggle: Was FDR a dictator?
 

GOP

Feb 2010
360
0
United Kingdom
Chavez is extremely popular. Venezuelans love him, they won't get rid of him. Besides, there's always election time, if they do.

So you don't think Chavez will find a way to win the elections even though he didn't really win? I think he'd cheat to get to power when it's election day.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Chavez is extremely popular. Venezuelans love him, they won't get rid of him. Besides, there's always election time, if they do.
So then I assume you do not agree with the opening posting that Venezuela is a totalitarian State, where people aren't allowed to speak up?
 
Jan 2010
131
0
Alaska
Chavez is extremely popular. Venezuelans love him, they won't get rid of him. Besides, there's always election time, if they do.

Odd how those extremely popular leaders always seem to get 100% of the vote, I wonder how they manage to do that?
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Odd how those extremely popular leaders always seem to get 100% of the vote, I wonder how they manage to do that?

Chavez has yet to get 100% of the vote. Also, President Washington proved it was possible to be sufficiently popular to legally win an election with 100% of the vote. :p
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
So then I assume you do not agree with the opening posting that Venezuela is a totalitarian State, where people aren't allowed to speak up?

Well, I don't know. At what point does it become a totalitarian state? The People still get some say at election time. And actually, the system outside of election time is reasonably inclusive too, i'm told - but don't personally know. Is it still totalitarian if it's with the consent of its citizens?
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Well, I don't know. At what point does it become a totalitarian state? The People still get some say at election time. And actually, the system outside of election time is reasonably inclusive too, i'm told - but don't personally know. Is it still totalitarian if it's with the consent of its citizens?
Perhaps one can then say it is a dictatorship?
 

GOP

Feb 2010
360
0
United Kingdom
Well, I don't know. At what point does it become a totalitarian state? The People still get some say at election time. And actually, the system outside of election time is reasonably inclusive too, i'm told - but don't personally know. Is it still totalitarian if it's with the consent of its citizens?

The problem concerning Venezuela is that the people are getting less to say in different society matters everyday, more and more of the control is being transferred to the government. This is the definition of totalitarianism when the government are taking over control, exactly what happens in socialist countries. So as a conclusion it's okay to say that most socialist countries are totalitarian.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
This is the definition of totalitarianism when the government are taking over control, exactly what happens in socialist countries. So as a conclusion it's okay to say that most socialist countries are totalitarian.

Please shut up or educate yourself. :rolleyes:
 
Jan 2010
172
26
Miami
I'm one of those guys who calls socialism a bad thing... But the socialism I've come to know as far as Europe and our current president is concerned, I wouldn't put the two on the same page yet. Venezuela has gone a hell of a lot farther to quelch opposition, to the point that comparing what I consider run-of-the mill socialism to Venuela's current political atmosphere wouldn't do any justice. So far the most worrisome (if you want to call it that) thing I've seen here is bickering about whether stations are legit or not. That's pretty mundane compared to forcing stations off the air.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
I'm one of those guys who calls socialism a bad thing... But the socialism I've come to know as far as Europe and our current president is concerned, I wouldn't put the two on the same page yet. Venezuela has gone a hell of a lot farther to quelch opposition, to the point that comparing what I consider run-of-the mill socialism to Venuela's current political atmosphere wouldn't do any justice. So far the most worrisome (if you want to call it that) thing I've seen here is bickering about whether stations are legit or not. That's pretty mundane compared to forcing stations off the air.

A station's operating license expiring isn't the same thing as stopping free speech.
 
Jan 2010
172
26
Miami
A station's operating license expiring isn't the same thing as stopping free speech.

Of course, the expiration results from the refusal to renew the licenses. Chavez and his administration isn't shy about resorting to financial, legal, and extralegal means to weaken any media outlet it sees as a threat. Interestingly enough, most of the stations whose licenses were revoked were critical of Chavez's policies, mmmhmmm...
 
Last edited:
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Of course, the expiration results from the refusal to renew the licenses. Chavez and his administration isn't shy about resorting to financial, legal, and extralegal means to weaken any media outlet it sees as a threat. Interestingly enough, most of the stations whose licenses were revoked were critical of Chavez's policies, mmmhmmm...

Would you renew the license of a station that supported a coup against you? I personally draw the freedom of speech line at high treason myself.
 
Top