In case you haven't noticed, people here are getting uptight and upset with the facts I have posted over and over.
People would get a little uptight after you posted about 50 times in a row with material that you could have annoyed people less with by putting it all into one. I swear to god I spend time debating the crooks in some of the 9/11 conspiracies, and even the Pentagon flyover kooks aren't that annoying. No offense but you're not convincing people anymore with 50,000 repetitious posts anymore than you are with everything in one. In most forums your actions would be a breach of their MA regardless of any credibility you claim to have.
They are ignoring and denying visual facts.
7forever, let me introduce you to one of my favorite kicks. See this:
http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/451/1238970139182a.jpg
What is the relevance of this? Well, for starters it involves the same thing you're doing. You isolated a freeze frame and cherrypicked it to exploit an optical illusion in the footage.
In my little example above, closer inspection reveals that the images consist of fruit products, whose presentation on-screen gives the optical illusion of viewing "accessories."
Likewise, upon closer inspection, your footage shows what I told you over a month ago; it's not a hand with a pistol, it's the passenger moving his head in the footage. Beyond making for a cruely morbid **** brix demotivational poster with the eye trick it plays there's nothing you've posed to suggest it's what you claim it is. Furthermore your supposed video analysis is absolutely amateurish.
You all know that Greer...
You are not in any position to determine for people what they do or do not know. For one your accusations that people are "denying visual facts" is blatantly untrue and transparent, in fact the circumstances are quite different. You
"want" to be right; you
want to
"believe."You want to believe in the driver shooter so badly you'll overlook even the most basic of errors in order to reach your desired conclusion.
I am sure many people do care. Especially in and around Dallas. But around here it seems that people have gotten tried of the arguing about conspiracy theories.
I don't follow many CT's regularly, so I have only this and the 9/11 ones to compare with, but 7forever's activity most closely resembles the habits of CIT's pentagon flyover theories. Out of all the "sub theories" in these two areas that I've seen, the greer shooter version, and the CIT north of citgo theories represent some of the most absolutely stubborn people I've ever seen, stubborn as in, debate's not really an option; they're just "debating" to project themselves onto other people.