I think this will end with a constitutional law challenge to the US Supreme Court. The Court will say Arizona's laws are unconstitutional. Like the southern states in the US when the Court said black have a right to attend racially integrated public schools back in the 1960's, there will be a lot of angry people who don't like the ruling but will ultimately accept it.Please post a link for this or quote the section. I know it is only around 10 pages long, but, if the Attorney General for the US can't bother reading it, but can still talk out against it, I don't have the time for reading it either.
I think this will end with a constitutional law challenge to the US Supreme Court. The Court will say Arizona's laws are unconstitutional. Like the southern states in the US when the Court said black have a right to attend racially integrated public schools back in the 1960's, there will be a lot of angry people who don't like the ruling but will ultimately accept it.
Those are my predictions.
I think this will end with a constitutional law challenge to the US Supreme Court. The Court will say Arizona's laws are unconstitutional. Like the southern states in the US when the Court said black have a right to attend racially integrated public schools back in the 1960's, there will be a lot of angry people who don't like the ruling but will ultimately accept it.
Those are my predictions.
I'm not as much in agreement that it is racially oriented. The law itself is based on a reasonable premise; the border violence there has been a major problem and little has been done on the national level to try and mitigate it. The literature of the law with respect to whom can be stopped and why however is vague and leaves open the possibility of racial profiles on the part of individual policemen which is my main concern now. I think it needs to be fleshed out to get rid of that potential loop holeObviously, the concerns about illegal immigration are valid. But this issue is also poisoned by elements of racism and hate. If we cannot isolate the legitimate concerns from the ulterior motives behind the current immigration debate, I'm afraid this issue will continue to be divisive, and we're not going to reach a compromise acceptable to both sides.
I'm not as much in agreement that it is racially oriented. The law itself is based on a reasonable premise; the border violence there has been a major problem and little has been done on the national level to try and mitigate it. The literature of the law with respect to whom can be stopped and why however is vague and leaves open the possibility of racial profiles on the part of individual policemen which is my main concern now. I think it needs to be fleshed out to get rid of that potential loop hole
The schools are still segregated, at least here in Florida. Several SDs have been sued for noncompliance but it seems to be all for not.
I think this will end with a constitutional law challenge to the US Supreme Court. The Court will say Arizona's laws are unconstitutional. Like the southern states in the US when the Court said black have a right to attend racially integrated public schools back in the 1960's, there will be a lot of angry people who don't like the ruling but will ultimately accept it.
Those are my predictions.