The whole point is that CAN always be done. And there is no such thing as gay marriage, you're abuse of the term exposes your agenda.
So what do you call it when 2 gays decide to make their relationship official?
The whole point is that CAN always be done. And there is no such thing as gay marriage, you're abuse of the term exposes your agenda.
A civil union, but whatever one might call it, it is NOT a marriage.
A civil union, but whatever one might call it, it is NOT a marriage.
Civil union and marriage are synonyms. If two men, or two women can become civilly United and enjoy all the special privileges entailed in marriage then how is it different?
It is different because we have already learned how "separate but equal" is not equal even if just through the lens of perception, which is the perceiver's reality.
So why do people who perceive it one way get to force their perception into everybody else's reality?
Everyone decides things based on their perception, not just some people... A lot of people, myself included, believe that marriage should be marriage- gay or not. I am not a fan of separate, but equal, given what that has meant historically, especially in the US. That aside, I am not sure I even agree with marriage as a governmental institution despite its history, but that is really another issue.