I am an abstract thinker you are hopelessly stuck in a box, you would likely make a fantastic professor. The fact that you think there is proof, tells me you don't question, why would you question proof. Proof, fact, truth these are all words you use, and they are absolutes, you are calling the kettle black now. I never once claimed to know truth our fact or proof.
Again, I question everything just like you do. At least I believe you when you say it- you clearly can't do that for me. The point is that at a certain point there is great utility in considering certain things fact and others not. And you even seem to believe it when you say 1+1=2. That may well be true if for example a evil monster is manipulating all of your thoughts including 1+1 so he leads you to believe 1+1=2 instead of 1+1=3. And yet, you still consider 1+1=2 a fact, do you not? Therein lies your hypocrisy.
And you keep saying you don't consider anything fact, but it is quite obvious that you think or at least lead people to believe that your interpretation of the world that you are describing here is fact. You seem to think I am undoubtedly wrong. Again, an example of your hypocrisy.
And this hypocrisy is not meant as a putdown because I think your intentions are good, you just don't realize you are contradicting yourself yet.
What do you want them to teach? Obviously not intelligent design, I agree. I told you what they should teach, kids how to function in society. They suck at it. The us has a terrible education system.
What does that even mean? Give me specifics of what you want to teach.
As for what I want to teach, a lot of what we currently teach isn't bad, so a lot of that would stay. I would make some changes though- more rigor starting earlier, especially in mathematics, more economics, more emphasis on the scientific method, more statistics, more health-related topics.