Obama Makes the Case for Health Reform with MD's

Oct 2009
1
0
The dress code was unusual for the White House, but the message familiar.

Today 150 doctors from all 50 states wore their starched white lab coats for a presidential photo opportunity in the Rose Garden.

"You all look spiffy in your coats," Obama told them.

The White House had invited the doctors to illustrate that there's broad support for health care reform from the people who, polls show, also have earned the public trust.

"Nobody has more credibility with the American people on this issue than you do," Obama said.
With the Senate Finance Committee set to approve its health care bill this week, the President's tone signaled impatience with the ongoing debate.

"We have now been debating this issue of health insurance reform for months," Obama said. "We have listened to every charge and every counter-charge -- from the crazy claims about death panels to misleading warnings about a government takeover of our health care system."

"But when you cut through all the noise and all the distractions that are out there, I think what's most telling is that some of the people who are most supportive of reform are the very medical professionals who know the health care system best."

The President called for the doctors in support of reform to fan out across the country to make the case for why reform is so needed.

"Every one of you here today took an oath when you entered the medical profession. It was not an oath that you would spend a lot of time on the phone with insurance companies. It was not an oath that you would have to turn away patients who you know could use your help. You did not devote your lives to be bean counters or paper pushers. You took an oath so that you could heal people. You did it so you could save lives."


MED
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Ya, he took an oath too. To protect the country and its people. Is he doing it?

Yes. ;)

Fun fact, the US Gov't spends the most money on heath care of every 1st World nation. The US is also the only major 1st World nation not to have public health care.
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
Yes. ;)

Fun fact, the US Gov't spends the most money on heath care of every 1st World nation. The US is also the only major 1st World nation not to have public health care.
Fact: there is also no proven correlation between nationalized healthcare and quality or cheap prices. Considering that in the United States we can't buy health insurance across state lines, while in Germany people can pick from over 200 insurance companies, I can make the argument that we are already overregulated and as a result prices are so high. There are better ways to solve the healthcare problem than socializing the system even more than it already is because doing that will not solve the problem of a minimal supply. We should be encouraging more competition and ease certain regulations in order to increase the supply, which will also bring down prices and not sacrifice quality.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Yes. ;)

Fun fact, the US Gov't spends the most money on heath care of every 1st World nation. The US is also the only major 1st World nation not to have public health care.
I suspect that if the US should get the healthcare bill through that it would increase the spending even more. Getting health insurance for all is not equal to nationalizing the health industry. All of primary care is in private hands. For savings to really occur, along the lines that have been suggested, the whole society will have to be changed first and primary health care put in the hands of Government, i.e. on State level. If it were to stay as it is, then cost of healthcare will still be expensive, and the medical insurance increase it that more. Prices won't go down, they are guaranteed to go up.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
The White House had invited the doctors to illustrate that there's broad support for health care reform from the people who, polls show, also have earned the public trust.

The American People have supported health care reform for quite a few decades, actually. But public trust is unimportant. Will the corporate lobbyists support it? My guess is yes. In terms of Obamacare, anyway.

Incidentally, the majority of doctors support a system called single payer. And that's very different to what Obama is calling for.

Fact: there is also no proven correlation between nationalized healthcare and quality or cheap prices. Considering that in the United States we can't buy health insurance across state lines, while in Germany people can pick from over 200 insurance companies, I can make the argument that we are already overregulated and as a result prices are so high. There are better ways to solve the healthcare problem than socializing the system even more than it already is because doing that will not solve the problem of a minimal supply. We should be encouraging more competition and ease certain regulations in order to increase the supply, which will also bring down prices and not sacrifice quality.

The German system will not work in America at the moment.

If you want to make it work, i'll explain how to do it:

1. Dissolve the big corporations providing insurance.
2. Withdraw all public funding for insurance as it stands.
3. Dissolve Medicare and Medicaid.
4. Keep drug prices artificially low.
5. Introduce a law that requires everyone to have insurance.
6. Use public funding to pay for insurance for individuals below the poverty line.

That's the German system and how it works. That's how you might get it.

The German system provides universal healthcare. Basically because that principle is what any decent humane system is based around.

It's a very good system. It is effective, efficient and, in terms of tax, extremely cheap, particularly when compared, proportionally, to US public spending on healthcare, which costs a lot and yields poor results. Not to mention its enormous inefficiency.
 
Nov 2020
1,571
2
New Amsterdam
“Given the existence as uttered forth in the public works of Puncher and Wattmann of a personal God quaquaquaqua with white beard quaquaquaqua outside time without extension who from the heights of divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown but time will tell and suffers like the divine Miranda with those who for reasons unknown but time will tell are plunged in torment plunged in fire whose fire flames if that continues and who can doubt it will fire the firmament that is to say blast heaven to hell so blue still and calm so calm with a calm which even though intermittent is better than nothing but not so fast and considering what is more that as a result of the labours left unfinished crowned by the Acacacacademy of Anthropopopometry of Essy-in-Possy of Testew and Cunard it is established beyond all doubt all other doubt than that which clings to the labours of men that as a result of the labours unfinished of Testew and Cunard it is established as hereinafter but not so fast for reasons unknown that as a result of the public works of Puncher and Wattmann it is established beyond all doubt that in view of the labours of Fartov and Belcher left unfinished for reasons unknown of Testew and Cunard left unfinished it is established what many deny that man in Possy of Testew and Cunard that man in Essy that man in short that man in brief in spite of the strides of alimentation and defecation is seen to waste and pine waste and pine and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the strides of physical culture the practice of sports such as tennis football running cycling swimming flying floating riding gliding conating camogie skating tennis of all kinds dying flying sports of all sorts autumn summer winter winter tennis of all kinds hockey of all sorts penicilline and succedanea in a word I resume and concurrently simultaneously for reasons unknown to shrink and dwindle in spite of the tennis I resume flying gliding golf over nine and eighteen holes tennis of all sorts in a word for reasons unknown in Feckham Peckham Fulham Clapham namely concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown but time will tell to shrink and dwindle I resume Fulham Clapham in a word the dead loss per head since the death of Bishop Berkeley being to the tune of one inch four ounce per head approximately by and large more or less to the nearest decimal good measure round figures stark naked in the stockinged feet in Connemara in a word for reasons unknown no matter what matter the facts are there and considering what is more much more grave that in the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman it appears what is more much more grave that in the light the light the light of the labours lost of Steinweg and Peterman that in the plains in the mountains by the seas by the rivers running water running fire the air is the same and than the earth namely the air and then the earth in the great cold the great dark the air and the earth abode of stones in the great cold alas alas in the year of their Lord six hundred and something the air the earth the sea the earth abode of stones in the great deeps the great cold on sea on land and in the air I resume for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis the facts are there but time will tell I resume alas alas on on in short in fine on on abode of stones who can doubt it I resume but not so fast I resume the skull to shrink and waste and concurrently simultaneously what is more for reasons unknown in spite of the tennis on on the beard the flames the tears the stones so blue so calm alas alas on on the skull the skull the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the labours abandoned left unfinished graver still abode of stones in a word I resume alas alas abandoned unfinished the skull the skull in Connemara in spite of the tennis the skull alas the stones Cunard (mêlée, final vociferations) tennis… the stones… so calm… Cunard… unfinished…”
 
Top