Well in that case it is the fault of the government for not making them clean up too, is it not?
Okay so it is not a probably with expansion/growth, now is it?True since they are the ones that give the tax breaks and let them build new ones.
That is part of it. Things were much better here before we started outgrowing everything. It has required new schools, new water plant and huge expansion of the sewer system. And all that cost big money. Guess who's bills and taxes keep going up to pay for it.Okay so it is not a probably with expansion/growth, now is it?
You realize most of our expansion (in terms of relative immigration) was in the 1800s and early 1900s, right? Expansion was very good for us until government started cutting in more and more, establishing entitlements, and ending free immigration. Expansion and accepting all was the basis of the American dream.
That's fine, but I am pretty sure you believe in the old America- the freer America, do you not? You often hint that I have been deceived by new schools of thought, but have you ever thought that even what you learned as you grew was a deception of an older school of thought- of one that was actually revolutionary on the scale of history? Your ideas here have been the norm for thousands of years- America ~1900 and parts of it before (and I believe the founding fathers too) broke that trend.You know I don't believe in the "American Dream"!
I already said that democrats and some republicans (RINOs) support the invasion. Just saying that much is blurring the distinction between republicans and democrats: almost ALL democrats support the invasion, and FEW republicans support it - unfortunately, those few are in positions of power - the current GOP RINO establishment. And illegals would NOT support a president who signs an amnesty - they would all go to the party of freebies - the democrats.
Further, cracking down on employers would NOT cost a relatively large amount of money. Start throwing a few in prison for six months, and the rest will get the message pretty quick.
The America you grew up in was also not sustainable (if it was the 50s-60s). It might have been a good time to live in, but that doesn't mean it can continue forever or that your time didn't just push off problems to the future. Think about the early 2000s- things were dandy, everyone was buying houses, but it didn't last because it was not sustainable.
2000 was just an example. The point is that things being pleasant does not necessarily mean they will last or can last. Another example- if you get "high" off [insert drug of choice here], you feel great when you are high, but it does not last. Some things are not sustainable no matter what. In fact, they can be bad in the long term. A drug user saying "But I was happy when I was high" does not mean anything.
I never said what we have now is sustainable, I said the 50s-60s weren't.I am sorry, I am just to stupid to get this one. If you think what we have now is "sustainable" grab your pants, you are in for a surprise. This country is in the crapper, don't care what the "global data" says.
