wikileaks

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

wikileaks has revealed that many of the mainstream media sources are in bed with HRC. They send her campaign pre-released stories to edit and acquiesce to advice from her staffers about how stories are run.

not to mention all the other seedy stuff they uncovered.

read it and weep:

HERE IT IS=> Detailed List of Top Wikileaks Podesta Emails (Update 2)

why isn't the MSM reporting this!?! you may ask?

because they are implicated in this.

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

the scary part is the power the MSM has to shape the story. No real coverage of wikileaks, just hour after hour of alleged groping stories about Trump.

once again, appeal to the base emotions and the sheep are distracted and don't look at the wolf getting into the pen.

(for metaphor reference: wolf=Hillary)

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

WIKILEAKS EXPOSES CORRUPT MEDIA: This List of Reporters Were Taking Marching Orders from Hillary

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

Aufgeblassen said:
What makes you think "Wikileaks" opinion is anywhere near credible?

You gotta wonder what their agenda is!!!

That's the beauty of it. If one's secret emails are posted, they speak for themselves. no need for inference.

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

here her staffers indicate...

WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL: Hillary Advisors Admit She "HATES EVERYDAY AMERICANS"

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

it's convenient how hating everyday Americans if Ok, but being against illegal aliens is "bigoted".

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

NYT lets Hillary edit stories before they air.

New York Times Gave Hillary Veto Power | LifeZette

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

Harwood is the worst. what a tool.

VIDEO=> CNBC Crank John Harwood Abused GOP Candidates at Debate - Then Trashed Them in Email to Hillary Camp

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

Aufgeblassen said:
So what! We have a "free press". Not like we have Pravda only to rely on for info.

yet, free press means...

free press: a body of book publishers, news media, etc., not controlled or restricted by government censorship in political or ideological matters.

and I am showing you how they are controlled by political and ideological matters.

tecoyah · Oct 14, 2016

Relying on stolen and vague data that is easily currupted to make a case is rather foolish in my opinion.

arcturus88 · Oct 14, 2016

tecoyah said:
Relying on stolen and vague data that is easily currupted to make a case is rather foolish in my opinion.

Ignoring wikileaks for fear of it being true is perhaps more foolish.

tecoyah · Oct 15, 2016

arcturus88 said:
Ignoring wikileaks for fear of it being true is perhaps more foolish.

I suppose that could be true...yet I do not see internal campaign strategy discussions taken from stolen private e-mail and speeches talking about general concepts to be akin to being recoded talking about sexually dishonoring women to be even remotely similar. When it is followed up by further debasing women (and pretty much everyone else) and accusing anyone who he does not like of lying while he blatantly lies he is certainly not someone I want representing me or my country on the world stage.

arcturus88 · Oct 17, 2016

tecoyah said:
I suppose that could be true...yet I do not see internal campaign strategy discussions taken from stolen private e-mail and speeches talking about general concepts to be akin to being recoded talking about sexually dishonoring women to be even remotely similar. When it is followed up by further debasing women (and pretty much everyone else) and accusing anyone who he does not like of lying while he blatantly lies he is certainly not someone I want representing me or my country on the world stage.

while what was said was clearly sexist and misogynist and I frown on that in a candidate, even if it was 11 years ago. That said, Clinton , Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr have done worse at the height of their power.

My take is what is in wiki leaks is far worse, especially when it comes to the overt colluding between the Clinton machine and the media. It spells the END of the free press. Clearly, the media is moved and manipulated by political and ideological motives.

arcturus88 · Oct 17, 2016

Aufgeblassen said:
NOBODY is doing that - hello?!

THE MSM indeed reported on it (ABC News) last night, BUT with the statement "we cannot INDEPENDENTLY confirm the voracity of this story". In other words, it may be true, or it may be all made up. It is anybody's guess. Don't jump to conclusion that it is indeed factual.

Or to put it another way: TAKE IT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

excellent impression of a naïve rube.
I know you better though.

tecoyah · Oct 17, 2016

arcturus88 said:
while what was said was clearly sexist and misogynist and I frown on that in a candidate, even if it was 11 years ago. That said, Clinton , Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr have done worse at the height of their power.

My take is what is in wiki leaks is far worse, especially when it comes to the overt colluding between the Clinton machine and the media. It spells the END of the free press. Clearly, the media is moved and manipulated by political and ideological motives.

It is very clear that your interpretation of Donald Trump and my own will never be even similar, that is just fine but as stated I see the inability to grasp these realities as reason to lose respect for the intellectual prowess of anyone lacking this basic ability.

Not that this will make any difference in said individuals thought process, I simply feel it should be said.

arcturus88 · Oct 17, 2016

tecoyah said:
It is very clear that your interpretation of Donald Trump and my own will never be even similar, that is just fine but as stated I see the inability to grasp these realities as reason to lose respect for the intellectual prowess of anyone lacking this basic ability.

Not that this will make any difference in said individuals thought process, I simply feel it should be said.

oh yeah?...oh yeah?...well...well...I think anyone who would vote for HRC over DJT (who sometimes says mean things) despite her apparent, overt and obvious corruption is either a poopoo head or a scaredy-cat that prefers to live in a world of comfortable denial.

Hey! I retract my previous comments about debate being preferred to insults.

it's actually great fun using thinly-veiled name -calling to insult. Much better than debate actually! we should all do it more often.

tecoyah · Oct 17, 2016

arcturus88 said:
oh yeah?...oh yeah?...well...well...I think anyone who would vote for HRC over DJT (who sometimes says mean things) despite her apparent, overt and obvious corruption is either a poopoo head or a scaredy-cat that prefers to live in a world of comfortable denial.

Hey! I retract my previous comments about debate being preferred to insults.

it's actually great fun using thinly-veiled name -calling to insult. Much better than debate actually! we should all do it more often.

It is unfortunate that you take my honesty as insult....I apologize for the slight you perceive but NOT for the statement itself.

arcturus88 · Oct 17, 2016

tecoyah said:
It is unfortunate that you take my honesty as insult....I apologize for the slight you perceive but NOT for the statement itself.

no offense taken really. making light of ...

...I see the inability to grasp these realities as reason to lose respect for the intellectual prowess of anyone lacking this basic ability.

arcturus88 · Oct 18, 2016

Ecuador cuts Julian Assange's internet access: WikiLeaks | Reuters

arcturus88 · Oct 18, 2016

On Wikileaks statement:

FACTS:
1. Wikileaks documents revealed #DNC /#Hillary corruption.
2. Neither deny their authenticity.

wikileaks

Similar threads