Will Khāmene?i flee Iran?

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
There are rumors circulating that Supreme Leader Ali Khāmene’i of Iran will flee the country due to the increasing unrest among the people. Do you think this will happen and if so, what will be the state of the nation?
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
You know my view on the matter. I think a good old Obama-ist slogan should be used...

6a00d83451bc4a69e201156eb7ab95970c-pi


Well, okay, slightly modified.

:)
 

myp

Jan 2009
5,841
50
The protesters will certainly continue what they are doing (at least at first)- I think there is little disagreement about that. The real worry is what will happen on the government side with some predicting that it will move to an official military state, which would of course mean more brutality against the people. If that does happen, let's hope that the Iranian people can hold their ground and keep going.

Thomas Jefferson's quotation really comes to mind in this situation, "The tree of liberty must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
Thomas Jefferson's quotation really comes to mind in this situation, "The tree of liberty must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

The only function a tyrant has for society - or for humanity - is as compost.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
I am nor sure if he will flee, but either way I think the protesters will keep going and it could get ugly.

I just hope Israel doesn't screw this up by attacking. The protestors would suddenly side with the gov't due to having a common enemy and you can kiss our oil and Mideast naval presence goodbye.
 
Mar 2009
2,751
6
Undisclosed
I just hope Israel doesn't screw this up by attacking. The protestors would suddenly side with the gov't due to having a common enemy and you can kiss our oil and Mideast naval presence goodbye.
If we can judge from past experience I would bet they will attack. And the US does not have the pull with them it had a few years ago.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
If we can judge from past experience I would bet they will attack. And the US does not have the pull with them it had a few years ago.

Lets just hope we pull our naval forces out before it all hits the fan, the Iranians are more then capable of sending our fleet to the bottom, especially in an area like that.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
If we can judge from past experience I would bet they will attack. And the US does not have the pull with them it had a few years ago.

Sure it does. Just tell them if they attack, you won't send them any more free fighter jets paid for out of the pockets of American taxpayers.

:giggle:
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
Sure it does. Just tell them if they attack, you won't send them any more free fighter jets paid for out of the pockets of American taxpayers.

:giggle:

And they'll call BS. And they'll be right.

Until we elect an openly anti-Zionist gov't (ya, riggggght :rolleyes:) we'll be their slaves.
 
Mar 2009
2,751
6
Undisclosed
Sure it does. Just tell them if they attack, you won't send them any more free fighter jets paid for out of the pockets of American taxpayers.

:giggle:
They don't like or respect Obama anymore than I do. And they know when push comes to shove we can't abandon them.
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
And they'll call BS. And they'll be right.

Well, yah. I was making the presumption that your leaders had the balls to stand up to the Israel lobby. Which, of course, is highly unlikely, since they pay a good chunk of their campaign money.

:p

They don't like or respect Obama anymore than I do. And they know when push comes to shove we can't abandon them.

Well, you could. It would just mean they have to be nice to people, rather than annexing their neighbours' lands.

:giggle:

But as comrade David says, it's highly unlikely.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
I was just wondering whether the CIA would be involved with the protestors? Do you think that it would be in the interest of the US Government to keep the protestors alive and protesting?
 
Mar 2009
2,751
6
Undisclosed
I was just wondering whether the CIA would be involved with the protestors? Do you think that it would be in the interest of the US Government to keep the protestors alive and protesting?
With this government who can tell what they are doing? I really don't have a lot of confidence in leadership at the CIA.:(
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
I was just wondering whether the CIA would be involved with the protestors? Do you think that it would be in the interest of the US Government to keep the protestors alive and protesting?

Hasn't the US intervened in Iran enough? Come on, you saw what happened last time the CIA involved itself in Iranian internal poitics.
 
Jan 2013
316
4
Delaware
I was just wondering whether the CIA would be involved with the protestors? Do you think that it would be in the interest of the US Government to keep the protestors alive and protesting?


I'm absolutely sure there is some involvement, however indirect it may be. At this point in time, any change in leadership would probably be better than the current one.

Iran is continuing to develop nuclear weapons and if we don't attack them first, Israel will. Unfortunately at this point, a conflict is all but inevitable.

Hopefully there will be another revolution but Mahmoud has quite a bit of support himself. If things turn violent, it honestly looks like it could be a bloody civil war.
 
Jul 2009
5,893
474
Port St. Lucie
I'm absolutely sure there is some involvement, however indirect it may be. At this point in time, any change in leadership would probably be better than the current one.

Iran is continuing to develop nuclear weapons and if we don't attack them first, Israel will. Unfortunately at this point, a conflict is all but inevitable.

Hopefully there will be another revolution but Mahmoud has quite a bit of support himself. If things turn violent, it honestly looks like it could be a bloody civil war.

If it come to war, we're screwed, at least at 1st. Say goodbye to our naval presence in the PG (due to retreat or sinking) for starts.
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
Hasn't the US intervened in Iran enough? Come on, you saw what happened last time the CIA involved itself in Iranian internal poitics.
Has any of that in any of the other countries where the CIA has been doing similar stuff discouraged the CIA from contuing? I'm almost certain their reasoning would be "this time we need to do it better". Better meaning that they are providing more indirect support of the invisible category, than paying people to show up at rallies. I don't have a real clue however, and am just guessing loudly. I must say I am really surprised that the Iranians have allowed themselves to be suppressed as long as they have. More than 20 years?
 
Apr 2009
1,943
5
Disunited Queendom
I'm absolutely sure there is some involvement, however indirect it may be. At this point in time, any change in leadership would probably be better than the current one.

Iran is continuing to develop nuclear weapons and if we don't attack them first, Israel will. Unfortunately at this point, a conflict is all but inevitable.

Hopefully there will be another revolution but Mahmoud has quite a bit of support himself. If things turn violent, it honestly looks like it could be a bloody civil war.

Ahmedinejad is all rhetoric and very little foreign intervention (except funding some religious fundamentalist groups). I doubt the opposition would be much better.

Has any of that in any of the other countries where the CIA has been doing similar stuff discouraged the CIA from contuing? I'm almost certain their reasoning would be "this time we need to do it better". Better meaning that they are providing more indirect support of the invisible category, than paying people to show up at rallies. I don't have a real clue however, and am just guessing loudly. I must say I am really surprised that the Iranians have allowed themselves to be suppressed as long as they have. More than 20 years?

Oh, longer than that. Iran came into existence in 1935. They were invaded sometime during the Second World War (i forget which year) by Britain and the Soviet Union. Then America emplaced a tyrannical regime in '53. There was the Islamic Revolution in '79, which replaced the tyrannical US supported r?gime with another tyrannical r?gime, which wasn't.

So, pretty much constantly since '53.

I can leave a hint as to why the Middle East is so chaotic at the moment: where have all the old secular nationalist states gone?
 
Mar 2009
2,188
2
I can leave a hint as to why the Middle East is so chaotic at the moment: where have all the old secular nationalist states gone?
Power struggles have always been part of society. I don't think much as changed, except the players and some of their issues.
 
Top