Well a good deal of skepticism when it comes to the promises of politicians isn't just healthy, its wise. I would argue however that Obama is the only one who can bring any real change. McCain, even though I respect him more than anyone else in the GOP, is still GOP. That party has run roughshod over not only our long term interests in the pursuit of their short sighted domestic agenda, but has diminished the core beliefs in judicial process and humanitarian treatment of prisoners. They need a trip to the woodshed for blatantly looking out for their interests ahead of those of the people. For the obfuscations and back room dealings that they have hid every step of the way from us. Also, McCain has stated in no uncertain terms that we are staying in Iraq despite the fact we have proven unable to make any headway in bringing law and order to that country. He will continue on the path that Bush has and I feel to no greater effect than Bush. Our soldiers and our money will vanish down that hole for as long as we let it.
Clinton is even more tied to the past via her marriage. How we can even think to elect another family connected president is beyond me. Imagine if this were some other country, and for 20 years they speak of being the most democratic and free nation in the world, yet seem to have no other leadership options but members from 2 families. It would look bad because it is bad.
It seems to me that people are against Obama because he speaks too much of how great things could be. I worry that should he get the Oval Office america will expect an overnight magical transformation where everything is right and we should all know thats not going to happen. Its going to happen in increments and with a good deal of work. Yet I feel he is the only one who offers even the promise of anything actually being different. I'm willing to take the chance that it can happen under an Obama administration.