So first you say that you want to give anyone any of the essentials they need, then you say you want the guy to work for his Ferraris. Which is it? Because essentials is arguable and he can argue he needs the Ferraris.
what Isaid was :"I 'm entertaining the Idea of making the essential things free in an acceptable level .
that doesn't mean I will put caviar on the table nor does it mean I will prevent any body to work his butt out to get caviar in his table or get that diamond ring or that 10000000 Ferraris ." show me ware I wanted any to do any .
The quantity might be fine, but the distribution is not perfect. The result is that not everyone has drinkable water.
may be that is true in the context of your train of thoughts but the context I said it in is how that the most important aspect of life namely air and water is free
They are based on mortgages. Do you think mortgages are phony? Do you think loans are phony? Do you think bonds and stocks are phony? Do you think property certificates are phony?
can you tell or can a certificate holder tell what type of mortgage it is based on , is it prime mortgage , sub prime mortgage or Laosy mortgage . and the three typ of certificate why they are treated differently since thay are based on the same mortgages and how can an investment be based on a mortgage .any how her you go if they are not a piramyd scheme the melt down wouldn't have happened . if you insist on hailing these schemes it is not a problem for me . you are were you chose .
It was formed so that the government insurance programs passed with it were less morally hazardous.
That is your opinion , keep it .
Have you ever thought why the subprime mortgages were made? There is high risk with such mortgages- the only reason it went through is because the companies were able to publicize losses on that risk (effectively insuring it) due to government policy.
what companies you are talking about , and how they publicize the risk .
That analogy does not work- no one knew the things would crash like they did to start with. It happened unknowingly- both Ford and Toyota have accidentally installed hazardous things in the past too.
what did they expect from a pyramid scheme-like investment and I mean those investment banks at least ford and toyota will recall and fix the product .
What? What does "prugh" mean?
Sorry
low rates, and the FDIC are the salt and pepper for this whiche's brew recipe
You say it is a possibility. I bolded the part you said it at in this quotation. Show me how it is a possibility- numbers/proof or a supporting argument please.
what exactly you want detail what you want because I cant imagene the scope of you request or what is your counter argument . I showed you a link about eu project . I think ether of us understand this word differently.
), just spend more time typing and get it right.
