Islam isn't just a religion but a lifestyle, legal system and cultural anchor, collectively known as Deen. The logical conclusion of Deen should be clear to anyone who thinks about it for more then a few seconds, if Islam is to be a way of life, why not apply it to gov't? The result of this is Islam applied not as a religion but rather as an ideology, Islamism.
Now while it's true some Islamist groups (Taliban and Hamas being the most noteworthy) have selectively taken the most violent parts of their religion to justify their actions, the fact is most Islamists are only interested in living in accordance to their religious beliefs, namely absolute obedience to God and respect for the prophets (Abraham, Elisha, Jesus and Mohammad being considered the cream of the crop). The result is a seemingly odd (to a Westerner) mix of strict religiosity and secular governance. If you asked a typical Islamist if they supported liberal-democracy or Sharia they would simply reply, "Yes." Yes they want to have laws that don't violate Sharia (this includes things such as religious freedom for the Peoples of the Book, a duty to give to charity, defending the weak and treating murders as they would those guilty of genocide for anyone who attributes violence to the word) but they also want to be free to practice their religion in peace and to elect their leaders.
Alas vary few in the West have actually ever studied Sharia or Deen and so end up looking to Hamas as an example of Islamism rather then the Green Crescent (Islamist Red Cross basically). Only when the West realizes that democracy and religion are 1 and the same in the Islamic world can we implement policies that achieve our strategic interests while not alienating the nearly 2 billion people who happen to live in proximity to and control those interests. Continuing to view Islamic civilization as backward and trying to 'fix' it will accomplish only 1 thing, more terrorists, it's time for a change and that change is educated tolerance.
Now while it's true some Islamist groups (Taliban and Hamas being the most noteworthy) have selectively taken the most violent parts of their religion to justify their actions, the fact is most Islamists are only interested in living in accordance to their religious beliefs, namely absolute obedience to God and respect for the prophets (Abraham, Elisha, Jesus and Mohammad being considered the cream of the crop). The result is a seemingly odd (to a Westerner) mix of strict religiosity and secular governance. If you asked a typical Islamist if they supported liberal-democracy or Sharia they would simply reply, "Yes." Yes they want to have laws that don't violate Sharia (this includes things such as religious freedom for the Peoples of the Book, a duty to give to charity, defending the weak and treating murders as they would those guilty of genocide for anyone who attributes violence to the word) but they also want to be free to practice their religion in peace and to elect their leaders.
Alas vary few in the West have actually ever studied Sharia or Deen and so end up looking to Hamas as an example of Islamism rather then the Green Crescent (Islamist Red Cross basically). Only when the West realizes that democracy and religion are 1 and the same in the Islamic world can we implement policies that achieve our strategic interests while not alienating the nearly 2 billion people who happen to live in proximity to and control those interests. Continuing to view Islamic civilization as backward and trying to 'fix' it will accomplish only 1 thing, more terrorists, it's time for a change and that change is educated tolerance.